Suppr超能文献

痔的联合放射凝固术的门诊治疗。

Ambulatory therapy with combined hemorrhoidal radiocoagulation.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013 Jan;17(1):130-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This is a prospective randomized study to analyze results obtained in two groups of patients affected of grade II hemorrhoids and treated with Radiofrequency Coagulation (RFC) or Combined Hemorrhoidal Radiocoagulation (CHR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study comprehended 30 patients of which 27 had at least 6 months of follow-up. Two groups of patients were considered: group A, represented by 12 individuals treated with RFC, and group B, consisting of 15 patients treated with CHR. Our purpose was to determine: grade of pain felt immediately after procedure and at first evacuation (score from 1 to 10), bleeding, patient's satisfaction 15 days and 6 months after treatment (score from 1 to 10) and incidence of failures.

RESULTS

Mean pain score reported immediately after procedure was 2.08 ± 0.9 for group A and 2.40 ± 1.5 for group B (p = NS). At first evacuation, mean pain score for group A and for group B was 2.16 ± 1.1 vs 2.33 ± 1.17, respectively (p = NS). Satisfaction score during first 15 days was 6.75 ± 2.76 for patients treated with RFC and 6.08 ± 2.20 for patients who received CHR (p = NS), while mean score of overall satisfaction after 6 months was 6.33 ± 1.96 (group A) vs 7.83 ± 2.05 (group B) (p < 0.05). At 6 months of follow-up, we observed 8 patients free from pain in group A (66.7%) and 13 patients in group B (86.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Results reported in both groups of patients confirm validity and efficacy of the two techniques used in this study, even if later in time CHR showed better results than RFC.

摘要

背景

这是一项前瞻性随机研究,旨在分析接受射频凝固(RFC)或联合痔放射凝固(CHR)治疗的 II 度痔患者的两组结果。

患者和方法

该研究纳入了 30 名患者,其中 27 名患者有至少 6 个月的随访。将患者分为两组:A 组 12 例,接受 RFC 治疗;B 组 15 例,接受 CHR 治疗。我们的目的是确定:术后即刻和首次排便时的疼痛程度(评分 1-10 分)、出血、治疗后 15 天和 6 个月的患者满意度(评分 1-10 分)和失败发生率。

结果

A 组和 B 组术后即刻疼痛评分分别为 2.08 ± 0.9 和 2.40 ± 1.5(p = NS)。首次排便时,A 组和 B 组的疼痛评分分别为 2.16 ± 1.1 和 2.33 ± 1.17(p = NS)。RFC 治疗的患者在治疗后 15 天的满意度评分为 6.75 ± 2.76,接受 CHR 的患者为 6.08 ± 2.20(p = NS),而 6 个月时的总体满意度评分为 6.33 ± 1.96(A 组)和 7.83 ± 2.05(B 组)(p < 0.05)。在 6 个月的随访中,A 组 8 例(66.7%)患者无疼痛,B 组 13 例(86.7%)患者无疼痛。

结论

两组患者的结果均证实了本研究中使用的两种技术的有效性和疗效,尽管 CHR 在后期显示出优于 RFC 的效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验