Suppr超能文献

眼内注射后眼痛。

Ocular pain after intravitreal injection.

机构信息

Ophthalmology Unit, Palencia Hospital Complex (CAPA), Palencia, Spain.

出版信息

Curr Eye Res. 2013 Feb;38(2):278-82. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2012.758290. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of different anesthetics and topical anti-inflammatory treatment in patients undergoing intravitreal injections (IVI).

METHODS

Prospective, randomized, double masked, comparative study. Patients undergoing 0.05 mL IVI were randomized to two different preoperative anesthetic regimes (regime A [0.5% tetracaine + naphazoline] versus regime B [5% lidocaine]) and two different post-injection topical protocols (protocol 1 [tobramycin qid] versus protocol 2 [tobramycin qid + diclofenac qid]). Patients were trained to score pain using a numerical rating pain scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (excruciating pain) immediately after the injection, 30 min and 24 h later. Patients were instructed to take oral paracetamol (650-1000 mg, adjusted to the patient's weight) every six hours ad lib if necessary.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients were enrolled; 86 patients were randomized to regime A and 70 to regime B; 78 patients were assigned to each of the post-injection topical protocols. The average pain score immediately after the IVI was 2.77 (SD 2.12) for the whole group (2.85, SD 2.23 with tetracaine and 2.67, SD 2.00 with lidocaine; p = 0.73, Mann-Whitney U-test). Twenty-four hours later, the average pain score was 1.84, SD 2.45 (topical diclofenac + tobramycin) versus 1.75, SD 1.83 (topical tobramycin; p = 0.46, Mann-Whitney U-test). Forty-seven patients (30%) required oral paracetamol (average 3.3 and range 1-5 tablets). Conjunctival hemorrhage 30 min after the injection was less frequent and severe in eyes treated with topical naphazoline (p = 0.055, Mann-Whitney U-test).

CONCLUSIONS

Topical tetracaine and lidocaine provide similar anesthesia before IVI. Topical diclofenac does not seem to reduce pain scores after IVI.

摘要

目的

评估不同麻醉剂和局部抗炎治疗在接受玻璃体内注射(IVI)的患者中的疗效。

方法

前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照研究。接受 0.05 mL IVI 的患者随机分为两种不同的术前麻醉方案(方案 A [0.5% 丁卡因+萘甲唑啉]与方案 B [5% 利多卡因])和两种不同的注射后局部方案(方案 1 [妥布霉素 qid]与方案 2 [妥布霉素 qid+双氯芬酸钠 qid])。患者在注射后立即、30 分钟和 24 小时后使用数字评分疼痛量表(0 表示无痛,10 表示剧痛)对疼痛进行评分。如果需要,患者被指示每六小时口服扑热息痛(650-1000mg,根据患者体重调整)。

结果

共有 156 名患者入组;86 名患者被随机分配到方案 A,70 名患者被随机分配到方案 B;78 名患者被分配到每个注射后局部方案。整个组的平均疼痛评分在 IVI 后立即为 2.77(SD 2.12)(使用丁卡因时为 2.85,SD 2.23;使用利多卡因时为 2.67,SD 2.00;p=0.73,Mann-Whitney U 检验)。24 小时后,平均疼痛评分分别为 1.84,SD 2.45(局部双氯芬酸钠+妥布霉素)与 1.75,SD 1.83(局部妥布霉素;p=0.46,Mann-Whitney U 检验)。47 名患者(30%)需要口服扑热息痛(平均 3.3 片,范围 1-5 片)。注射后 30 分钟,使用局部萘甲唑啉治疗的眼睛结膜出血较少且较轻(p=0.055,Mann-Whitney U 检验)。

结论

局部使用丁卡因和利多卡因在 IVI 前提供相似的麻醉效果。局部使用双氯芬酸钠似乎不能降低 IVI 后的疼痛评分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验