Vauquelin Georges, Charlton Steven J
Department Molecular and Biochemical Pharmacology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Br J Pharmacol. 2013 Apr;168(8):1771-85. doi: 10.1111/bph.12106.
Bivalent ligands are increasingly important therapeutic agents. Although the naturally occurring antibodies are predominant, it is becoming more common to combine different antibody fragments or even low molecular weight compounds to generate heterobivalent ligands. Such ligands exhibit markedly increased affinity (i.e. avidity) and target residence time when both pharmacophores can bind simultaneously to their target sites. This is because binding of one pharmacophore forces the second tethered one to stay close to its corresponding site. This 'forced proximity' favours its binding and rebinding (once dissociated) to that site. However, rebinding will also take place when the diffusion of freshly dissociated ligands is merely slowed down. The present differential equation-based simulations explore the way both situations affect ligand binding. Both delay the attainment of binding equilibrium (resulting in steep saturation curves) and also increase the target residence time. Competitive ligands are able to interfere in a concentration-dependent manner, although much higher concentrations are required in the 'forced proximity' situation. Also, it is only in that situation that the ligand shows increased affinity. These simulations shed light on two practical consequences. Depending on the pharmacokinetic half-life of the bivalent ligand in the body, it may not have sufficient time to achieve equilibrium with the target. This will result in lower potency than expected, although it would have significant advantages in terms of residence time. In in vitro experiments, the manifestation of steep saturation curves and of accelerated dissociation in the presence of competitive ligands could mistakenly be interpreted as evidence for non-competitive, allosteric interactions.
双价配体正日益成为重要的治疗剂。尽管天然存在的抗体占主导地位,但将不同的抗体片段甚至低分子量化合物结合以产生异双价配体的情况越来越普遍。当两个药效基团都能同时与其靶位点结合时,此类配体表现出显著增加的亲和力(即亲合力)和靶标驻留时间。这是因为一个药效基团的结合会迫使与之相连的第二个药效基团靠近其相应位点。这种“强制接近”有利于其与该位点的结合和再结合(一旦解离)。然而,当新解离的配体的扩散仅仅减慢时,再结合也会发生。目前基于微分方程的模拟探究了这两种情况影响配体结合的方式。两者都会延迟结合平衡的达到(导致陡峭的饱和曲线),并且还会增加靶标驻留时间。竞争性配体能够以浓度依赖的方式进行干扰,尽管在“强制接近”情况下需要高得多的浓度。而且,只有在那种情况下配体才表现出增加的亲和力。这些模拟揭示了两个实际后果。根据双价配体在体内的药代动力学半衰期,它可能没有足够的时间与靶标达到平衡。这将导致效力低于预期,尽管在驻留时间方面它会有显著优势。在体外实验中,陡峭的饱和曲线以及在存在竞争性配体时加速解离的表现可能会被错误地解释为非竞争性变构相互作用的证据。