• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国国民保健制度医院前切除术吻合口漏的经济影响:我们是否给予了足够的补偿?

The economic impact of anastomotic leakage after anterior resections in English NHS hospitals: are we adequately remunerating them?

机构信息

Oxford Colorectal Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2013 Apr;15(4):e190-8. doi: 10.1111/codi.12125.

DOI:10.1111/codi.12125
PMID:23331871
Abstract

AIM

Our aim was to determine the frequency and economic impact of anastomotic leakage (AL) at local and national levels in England.

METHOD

All patients who underwent AR in Oxford between 2007 and 2009 were evaluated for AL. Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data were used to determine reoperation rates after elective AR (n = 23 388) in England between 2000 and 2008. Hospital episode remuneration costs were calculated by the local commissioning department and compared with Department of Health (DH) reference index costs.

RESULTS

The frequency of AL following anterior resection was 10.9% (31 out of 285) in Oxford. Laparotomy for leakage was performed in 5.6% of cases. The 30-day hospital mortality rate for all ARs was 2.1%, compared with 3.2% after AL. The national relaparotomy rate (within 28 days) and 30-day hospital mortality in English National Health Service (NHS) trusts following AR were 5.9% and 2.9%, respectively. Institutional remunerated tariffs (£6233 (SD ± 965)) were similar to DH reference costs (£6319 (SD ± 1830)) after uncomplicated AR. However, there was a significant (P = 0.008) discrepancy between the remunerated tariff for AL (£9605 (SD ± 6908)) and the actual cost (£17 220 (SD ± 9642)). AL resulted in an additional annual cost of approximately £1.1 million to £3.5 million when extrapolated nationally.

CONCLUSION

The estimated economic burden of anastomotic leakage following AR is approximately double that of the remunerated tariff.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定英国局部和全国范围内吻合口漏(AL)的频率和经济影响。

方法

对 2007 年至 2009 年在牛津接受 AR 的所有患者进行 AL 评估。使用医院发病统计(HES)数据确定 2000 年至 2008 年英格兰选择性 AR(n=23388)的再手术率。由当地委托部门计算医院住院费用,并与卫生部(DH)参考指数成本进行比较。

结果

在牛津,前切除术吻合口漏的发生率为 10.9%(31/285)。漏口行剖腹手术的比例为 5.6%。所有 AR 的 30 天院内死亡率为 2.1%,而 AL 后为 3.2%。英国国家卫生服务(NHS)信托机构的全国再剖腹率(28 天内)和 30 天院内死亡率分别为 5.9%和 2.9%。机构报酬率(6233 英镑(SD±965))与简单 AR 的 DH 参考成本(6319 英镑(SD±1830))相似。然而,AL 的报酬率(9605 英镑(SD±6908))与实际成本(17220 英镑(SD±9642))之间存在显著差异(P=0.008)。当外推到全国范围时,AL 导致每年额外增加约 110 万至 350 万英镑的费用。

结论

估计 AR 后吻合口漏的经济负担约为报酬率的两倍。

相似文献

1
The economic impact of anastomotic leakage after anterior resections in English NHS hospitals: are we adequately remunerating them?英国国民保健制度医院前切除术吻合口漏的经济影响:我们是否给予了足够的补偿?
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Apr;15(4):e190-8. doi: 10.1111/codi.12125.
2
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.直肠癌前切除术吻合口漏的危险因素。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Jan;148(1):65-71. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamasurg.2.
3
Cost-effectiveness of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resections for rectal cancer: a call for benchmarking.直肠癌低位前切除术中去功能化造口的成本效益:呼吁建立基准。
Arch Surg. 2003 Dec;138(12):1334-8; discussion 1339. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.12.1334.
4
Conservative management is associated with a decreased risk of definitive stoma after anastomotic leakage complicating sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer.保守治疗与保肛直肠肿瘤切除术后吻合口漏导致确定性造口的风险降低有关。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Jun;13(6):632-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02252.x. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
5
Endoscopic needle knife therapy for anastomotic leakage following anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jun;14(6):e365-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02879.x.
6
Risk adjusted benchmarking of clinical anastomotic leakage rate after total mesorectal excision in the context of an improvement project.在一个改进项目的背景下,对全直肠系膜切除术后临床吻合口漏率进行风险调整基准测试。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jul;14(7):e413-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02977.x.
7
Delayed transanal repair of persistent coloanal anastomotic leak in diverted patients after resection for rectal cancer.直肠癌切除术后造口患者持续性经肛直肠吻合口漏的延迟经肛修复。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Oct;14(10):1238-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02932.x.
8
Anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer: a risk factor for local recurrence, distant metastasis and reduced cancer-specific survival?直肠癌手术后吻合口漏:局部复发、远处转移和降低癌症特异性生存的危险因素?
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Mar;13(3):272-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02136.x.
9
A financial analysis of revision hip arthroplasty: the economic burden in relation to the national tariff.髋关节翻修置换术的财务分析:与国家收费标准相关的经济负担
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 May;94(5):619-23. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B5.27073.
10
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum.直肠前切除术后吻合口漏的危险因素。
Colorectal Dis. 2004 Nov;6(6):462-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00657.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Deep Learning Model for Predicting Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage: A Pioneer Multicenter Transatlantic Study.一种用于预测结直肠吻合口漏的新型深度学习模型:一项开创性的跨大西洋多中心研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 3;14(15):5462. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155462.
2
Intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery to prevent anastomotic leakage: A single-blind phase III multicentre randomized controlled trial (FLUOCOL-01/FRENCH 21/GRECCAR 19 intergroup trial).术中吲哚菁绿荧光血管造影术在结直肠癌手术中预防吻合口漏:一项单盲III期多中心随机对照试验(FLUOCOL-01/FRENCH 21/GRECCAR 19组间试验)。
Colorectal Dis. 2025 May;27(5):e70119. doi: 10.1111/codi.70119.
3
Current evidence on powered versus manual circular staplers in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
结直肠手术中电动与手动圆形吻合器的当前证据:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jan 15;40(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04807-y.
4
Physical pressure resistance of gastrointestinal anastomotic site via plate of polyglycolic acid promoting fibrosis.聚乙二醇酸板促进纤维化增强胃肠道吻合部位的物理抗压能力。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 30;14(1):26124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77894-6.
5
Anastomotic leak after manual circular stapled left-sided bowel surgery: analysis of technology-, disease-, and patient-related factors.手工环形吻合术治疗左侧肠手术后吻合口漏:技术、疾病和患者相关因素分析。
BJS Open. 2024 Sep 3;8(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae089.
6
Negative and Positive Predictors of Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Cancer Patients-The Case of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio.结直肠癌患者吻合口漏的阴性和阳性预测因素——以中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值为例
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 19;14(16):1806. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161806.
7
An Institutional Shift from Routine to Selective Diversion of Low Anastomosis in Robotic TME Surgery for Rectal Cancer Patients Using the KHANS Technique: A Single-Centre Cohort Study.一项单中心队列研究:在直肠癌患者的机器人全直肠系膜切除术(TME)中,采用KHANS技术从常规低位吻合转为选择性分流的机构转变
J Pers Med. 2024 Jul 4;14(7):725. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070725.
8
Unraveling the role of computed tomography derived body composition metrics on anastomotic leakages rates in rectal cancer surgery: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.解析 CT 体成分测量指标在直肠癌手术吻合口漏发生率中的作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 24;19(7):e0307606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307606. eCollection 2024.
9
Incidence of anastomotic leakage using powered circular staplers versus manual circular staplers for left colorectal anastomosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.使用电动吻合器与手动吻合器行左半结直肠吻合术吻合口漏的发生率:成本效果分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Jul 2;28(1):76. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02936-0.
10
The economic impact of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: a systematic review.结直肠手术后吻合口漏的经济影响:系统评价。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 May 20;28(1):55. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02932-4.