Blum Kenneth, Oscar-Berman Marlene, Bowirrat Abdalla, Giordano John, Madigan Margaret, Braverman Eric R, Barh Debmayla, Hauser Mary, Borsten Joan, Simpatico Thomas
Department of Psychiatry and McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA ; Department of Holistic Medicine, G & G Holistic Addiction Treatment Center, North Miami Beach, FL, USA ; Department of Clinical Neurology, Path Foundation, New York, NY, USA ; Centre for Genomics and Applied Gene Technology, Institute of Integrative Omics and Applied Biotechnology (IIOAB), Nonakuri, PurbaMedinipur, West Bengal, India ; Department of Addiction Research and Therapy, Malibu Beach Recovery Center, Malibu Beach, CA, USA ; Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont School of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA.
J Genet Syndr Gene Ther. 2012 Apr 13;3(112). doi: 10.4172/2157-7412.1000112.
Mindful of the new evolutionary ideas related to an emerging scientific focus known as omics, we propose that spiritual, social, and political behaviors may be tied in part to inheritable reward gene polymorphisms, as has been demonstrated for the addictions. If so, analyses of gene polymorphisms may assist in predicting liberalism or conservatism in partisan attachments. For example, both drinking (alcohol) and obesity seem to cluster in large social networks and are influenced by friends having the same genotype, in particular the DRD2 A1 allele. Likewise, voting, voting turnout and attachment to a particular political ideology is differentially related to various reward genes (e.g., 5HTT, MOA, DRD2, and DRD4), possibly predicting liberalism or conservatism. Moreover, voters' genetic information may predict presidential outcomes more than the actual issues at hand or the presidential candidates themselves. Thus, political discussions on TV, radio, or other media may be morphed by one's reward gene polymorphisms and as such, may explain the prevalence of generations of die-hard republicans and equally entrenched democratic legacies. Indeed, even in politics, birds of a feather (homophily) flock together. We caution that our proposal should be viewed mindfully awaiting additional research before definitive statements or conclusions can be derived from the studies to date, and we encourage large scale studies to confirm these earlier reports.
考虑到与新兴的“组学”科学重点相关的新进化观点,我们提出,精神、社会和政治行为可能部分与可遗传的奖励基因多态性有关,就像成瘾行为所显示的那样。如果是这样,对基因多态性的分析可能有助于预测党派依恋中的自由主义或保守主义。例如,饮酒(酒精)和肥胖似乎在大型社交网络中聚集,并受到具有相同基因型的朋友的影响,特别是DRD2 A1等位基因。同样,投票、投票率以及对特定政治意识形态的依恋与各种奖励基因(如5HTT、MOA、DRD2和DRD4)存在差异关联,可能预示着自由主义或保守主义。此外,选民的基因信息可能比手头的实际问题或总统候选人本身更能预测总统选举结果。因此,电视、广播或其他媒体上的政治讨论可能会因一个人的奖励基因多态性而改变,从而可以解释几代顽固的共和党人和同样根深蒂固的民主党传统的普遍存在。的确,即使在政治领域,物以类聚(同质性)。我们提醒,在从迄今为止的研究中得出明确的陈述或结论之前,应谨慎看待我们的提议,等待更多研究,并且我们鼓励进行大规模研究以证实这些早期报告。