Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia; Centre of Excellence for Applied Sport Science Research, Queensland Academy of Sport, Queensland, Australia.
Gait Posture. 2013 Jul;38(3):380-4. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.12.017. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
Commercially available instrumented treadmill systems that provide continuous measures of temporospatial gait parameters have recently become available for clinical gait analysis. This study evaluated the level of agreement between temporospatial gait parameters derived from a new instrumented treadmill, which incorporated a capacitance-based pressure array, with those measured by a conventional instrumented walkway (criterion standard).
Temporospatial gait parameters were estimated from 39 healthy adults while walking over an instrumented walkway (GAITRite(®)) and instrumented treadmill system (Zebris) at matched speed. Differences in temporospatial parameters derived from the two systems were evaluated using repeated measures ANOVA models. Pearson-product-moment correlations were used to investigate relationships between variables measured by each system. Agreement was assessed by calculating the bias and 95% limits of agreement.
All temporospatial parameters measured via the instrumented walkway were significantly different from those obtained from the instrumented treadmill (P<.01). Temporospatial parameters derived from the two systems were highly correlated (r, 0.79-0.95). The 95% limits of agreement for temporal parameters were typically less than ±2% of gait cycle duration. However, 95% limits of agreement for spatial measures were as much as ±5cm.
Differences in temporospatial parameters between systems were small but statistically significant and of similar magnitude to changes reported between shod and unshod gait in healthy young adults. Temporospatial parameters derived from an instrumented treadmill, therefore, are not representative of those obtained from an instrumented walkway and should not be interpreted with reference to literature on overground walking.
商业上可用的仪器化跑步机系统最近已经可用于临床步态分析,这些系统可以提供连续的时空步态参数测量。本研究评估了一种新的仪器化跑步机(整合了基于电容的压力阵列)和传统仪器化步道(基准标准)得出的时空步态参数之间的一致性水平。
39 名健康成年人在匹配速度下在仪器化步道(GAITRite(®))和仪器化跑步机系统(Zebris)上行走时,估计了时空步态参数。使用重复测量 ANOVA 模型评估了两个系统得出的时空参数之间的差异。使用皮尔逊积矩相关系数研究了每个系统测量的变量之间的关系。通过计算偏差和 95%一致性界限来评估一致性。
通过仪器化步道测量的所有时空参数均与通过仪器化跑步机获得的参数有显著差异(P<.01)。两个系统得出的时空参数高度相关(r,0.79-0.95)。时间参数的 95%一致性界限通常小于步态周期持续时间的±2%。然而,空间测量的 95%一致性界限可达±5cm。
系统之间时空参数的差异很小,但具有统计学意义,与健康年轻成年人的穿鞋和不穿鞋步态之间报告的变化相似。因此,仪器化跑步机得出的时空参数与仪器化步道得出的参数不一致,不应参考关于地面行走的文献进行解释。