• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Improving the Odds Through the Collaboration Success Wizard.通过协作成功向导提高胜算。
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Dec 1;2(4):480-486. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0174-z. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
DNP Team Projects: A Reflection of Team Science.护理实践博士团队项目:团队科学的一种体现
J Dr Nurs Pract. 2022 Jul 1;15(2):123-128. doi: 10.1891/JDNP-2021-0021.
4
Forging a link between mentoring and collaboration: a new training model for implementation science.建立指导与合作之间的联系:一种实施科学的新培训模式。
Implement Sci. 2016 Oct 13;11(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0499-y.
5
Facebook for scientists: requirements and services for optimizing how scientific collaborations are established.面向科学家的Facebook:优化科学合作建立方式的要求与服务。
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Aug 13;10(3):e24. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1047.
6
Exploring the changing geographical pattern of international scientific collaborations through the prism of cities.从城市视角探索国际科学合作的地理格局变化。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 16;15(11):e0242468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242468. eCollection 2020.
7
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
8
The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science.团队科学的科学:对科学合作的实证证据和研究差距的综述。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):532-548. doi: 10.1037/amp0000319.
9
How do researchers perceive problems in research collaboration? Results from a large-scale study of German scientists.研究人员如何看待研究合作中的问题?来自对德国科学家的一项大规模研究的结果。
Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Feb 23;8:1106482. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1106482. eCollection 2023.
10
Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.日本作为超老龄化社会的领跑者:来自日本医学与医疗护理的视角
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jun;15(6):673-87. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12450. Epub 2015 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
C2M: a maturity model for the evaluation of communication in distributed software development.C2M:一种用于评估分布式软件开发中通信的成熟度模型。
Empir Softw Eng. 2022;27(7):188. doi: 10.1007/s10664-022-10211-9. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
2
Enhancing translational team effectiveness: The Wisconsin Interventions in Team Science framework for translating empirically informed strategies into evidence-based interventions.提高转化团队的效能:威斯康星团队科学干预框架,用于将基于实证的策略转化为循证干预措施。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jul 21;5(1):e158. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.825. eCollection 2021.
3
Measuring quality and outcomes of research collaborations: An integrative review.衡量研究合作的质量与成果:一项综合综述。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Oct 11;3(5):261-289. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.402. eCollection 2019 Oct.
4
Operational Failures Detected by Frontline Acute Care Nurses.一线急诊护士检测到的操作失误。
Res Nurs Health. 2017 Jun;40(3):197-205. doi: 10.1002/nur.21791. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
5
An emerging science and praxis for research and practice teams.一门适用于研究与实践团队的新兴科学及实践方法。
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Dec;2(4):411-4. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0180-1.
6
Reflections on developing collaborative research in pediatric psychology: implications and future directions.关于发展儿科心理学合作研究的思考:意义和未来方向。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2013 Aug;38(7):700-7. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jst026. Epub 2013 May 13.
7
Adopting best practices from team science in a healthcare improvement research network: the impact on dissemination and implementation.在医疗保健改进研究网络中采用团队科学的最佳实践:对传播与实施的影响。
Nurs Res Pract. 2013;2013:814360. doi: 10.1155/2013/814360. Epub 2013 Mar 17.

通过协作成功向导提高胜算。

Improving the Odds Through the Collaboration Success Wizard.

作者信息

Bietz Matthew J, Abrams Steve, Cooper Dan, Stevens Kathleen R, Puga Frank, Patel Darpan, Olson Gary M, Olson Judith S

机构信息

University of California, Irvine.

出版信息

Transl Behav Med. 2012 Dec 1;2(4):480-486. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0174-z. Epub 2012 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1007/s13142-012-0174-z
PMID:23338748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3547397/
Abstract

Collaboration has become a dominant mode of scientific inquiry, and good collaborative processes are important for ensuring scientific quality and productivity. Often the participants in these collaborations are not collocated, yet distance introduces challenges. There remains a need for evaluative tools that can identify potential collaboration problems early and provide strategies for managing and addressing collaboration issues. This paper introduces a new research and diagnostic tool, the Collaboration Success Wizard (CSW), and provides two case studies of its use in evaluating ongoing collaborative projects in the health sciences. The CSW is designed both to validate and refine existing theory about the factors that encourage successful collaboration and to promote good collaborative practices in geographically distributed team-based scientific projects. These cases demonstrate that the CSW can promote reflection and positive change in collaborative science.

摘要

合作已成为科学探究的主导模式,良好的合作流程对于确保科学质量和生产力至关重要。通常,这些合作中的参与者并不在同一地点,然而距离带来了挑战。仍然需要能够早期识别潜在合作问题并提供管理和解决合作问题策略的评估工具。本文介绍了一种新的研究和诊断工具——合作成功向导(CSW),并提供了两个案例研究,展示了其在评估健康科学领域正在进行的合作项目中的应用。CSW旨在验证和完善关于促进成功合作的因素的现有理论,并在地理上分散的基于团队的科学项目中推广良好的合作实践。这些案例表明,CSW可以促进合作科学中的反思和积极变革。