• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从城市视角探索国际科学合作的地理格局变化。

Exploring the changing geographical pattern of international scientific collaborations through the prism of cities.

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.

Department of Science Policy and Scientometrics, Library and Information Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 16;15(11):e0242468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242468. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0242468
PMID:33196668
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7668612/
Abstract

Science is becoming increasingly international in terms of breaking down walls in its pursuit of high impact. Despite geographical location and distance still being major barriers for scientific collaboration, little is known about whether high-impact collaborations are similarly constrained by geography compared to collaborations of average impact. To address this question, we analyze Web of Science (WoS) data on international collaboration between global leader cities in science production. We report an increasing intensity of international city-city collaboration and find that average distance of collaboration of the strongest connections has slightly increased, but distance decay has remained stable over the last three decades. However, high-impact collaborations span large distances by following similar distance decay. This finding suggests that a larger geographical reach of research collaboration should be aimed for to support high-impact science. The creation of the European Research Area (ERA) represents an effective action that has deepened intracontinental research collaborations and the position of the European Union (EU) in global science. Yet, our results provide new evidence that global scientific leaders are not sufficiently collaborative in carrying out their big science projects.

摘要

科学在追求高影响力方面,其国际合作日益紧密。尽管地理位置和距离仍然是科学合作的主要障碍,但对于高影响力的合作是否与平均影响力的合作一样受到地理因素的限制,人们知之甚少。为了解决这个问题,我们分析了科学产出方面的全球领先城市之间的国际合作的 Web of Science (WoS) 数据。我们报告了国际城市间合作的强度不断增加,并且发现最强联系的合作平均距离略有增加,但在过去三十年中距离衰减保持稳定。然而,高影响力的合作通过遵循相似的距离衰减来跨越较大的距离。这一发现表明,应该追求更大的地理研究合作范围,以支持高影响力的科学。欧洲研究区(ERA)的创建代表了一项有效的行动,它深化了欧洲大陆内部的研究合作以及欧盟在全球科学中的地位。然而,我们的研究结果提供了新的证据,表明在开展重大科学项目方面,全球科学领导者的合作还不够充分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb12/7668612/2be6e692f06a/pone.0242468.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb12/7668612/43d1a36eb15c/pone.0242468.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb12/7668612/2c4009938ea1/pone.0242468.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb12/7668612/9e44bcf6e0f2/pone.0242468.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb12/7668612/2be6e692f06a/pone.0242468.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb12/7668612/43d1a36eb15c/pone.0242468.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb12/7668612/2c4009938ea1/pone.0242468.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb12/7668612/9e44bcf6e0f2/pone.0242468.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb12/7668612/2be6e692f06a/pone.0242468.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the changing geographical pattern of international scientific collaborations through the prism of cities.从城市视角探索国际科学合作的地理格局变化。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 16;15(11):e0242468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242468. eCollection 2020.
2
Research on Biodiversity and Climate Change at a Distance: Collaboration Networks between Europe and Latin America and the Caribbean.远距离的生物多样性与气候变化研究:欧洲与拉丁美洲及加勒比地区之间的合作网络
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 15;11(6):e0157441. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157441. eCollection 2016.
3
Follow the leader: On the relationship between leadership and scholarly impact in international collaborations.跟随领导者:国际合作中领导力与学术影响力的关系。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 20;14(6):e0218309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218309. eCollection 2019.
4
World citation and collaboration networks: uncovering the role of geography in science.世界引文和合作网络:揭示地理在科学中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2012;2:902. doi: 10.1038/srep00902. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
5
EU health law and policy: shaping a future research agenda.欧盟卫生法律与政策:塑造未来研究议程
Health Econ Policy Law. 2021 Jan;16(1):1-7. doi: 10.1017/S1744133120000274. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
6
Does collocation inform the impact of collaboration?搭配是否影响合作?
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 15;5(12):e14279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014279.
7
Digital data-based strategies: A novel form of better understanding COVID-19 pandemic and international scientific collaboration.基于数字数据的策略:一种更好地了解 COVID-19 大流行和国际科学合作的新形式。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):e0249280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249280. eCollection 2021.
8
International stem cell collaboration: how disparate policies between the United States and the United Kingdom impact research.国际干细胞合作:美英政策差异如何影响研究。
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 8;6(3):e17684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017684.
9
Past, Current, and Future Cancer Clinical Research Collaborations: The Case of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.过去、现在和未来的癌症临床研究合作:以欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织为例。
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jan;14(1):47-53. doi: 10.1111/cts.12863. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
10
Dominance and leadership in research activities: Collaboration between countries of differing human development is reflected through authorship order and designation as corresponding authors in scientific publications.研究活动中的主导地位和领导作用:不同人类发展水平国家之间的合作通过科学出版物中的作者排名顺序和通讯作者指定得以体现。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 8;12(8):e0182513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182513. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping the landscape of vitamin D in cancer studies: a systematic global investigation.绘制癌症研究中维生素D的全景图:一项全球性系统调查。
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2025 Mar 10;24(1):78. doi: 10.1007/s40200-025-01594-9. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Challenges of biomedical research collaboration in India: Perceptions of Indian and international researchers.印度生物医学研究合作的挑战:印度和国际研究人员的看法。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 28;19(6):e0305159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305159. eCollection 2024.
3
Quantifying the impact of strong ties in international scientific research collaboration.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges of international oncology trial collaboration-a call to action.国际肿瘤学试验合作的挑战——行动呼吁。
Br J Cancer. 2019 Oct;121(7):515-521. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0532-4. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
2
Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology.大团队推动科学技术发展,小团队则颠覆之。
Nature. 2019 Feb;566(7744):378-382. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
3
Peripheral forces.外周力
量化强关系在国际科学研究合作中的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 17;18(1):e0280521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280521. eCollection 2023.
4
Scientific collaboration, research funding, and novelty in scientific knowledge.科学合作、研究资金与科学知识的新颖性。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 25;17(7):e0271678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271678. eCollection 2022.
5
Geographies of the global co-editor network in oncology.肿瘤学全球共同编辑网络的地理学研究
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 17;17(3):e0265652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265652. eCollection 2022.
Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7729):S18-S19. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-07210-6.
4
The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge?精英文章中的参考文献地域分布:哪些国家为知识档案做出了贡献?
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 26;13(3):e0194805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194805. eCollection 2018.
5
Network structure of scientific collaborations between China and the EU member states.中国与欧盟成员国之间科学合作的网络结构。
Scientometrics. 2017;113(2):765-781. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2488-6. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
6
Big Science, Team Science, and Open Science for Neuroscience.大科学、团队科学与神经科学的开放科学
Neuron. 2016 Nov 2;92(3):612-616. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.10.019.
7
NEUROSCIENCE. International brain projects proposed.神经科学。国际大脑计划被提出。
Science. 2016 Apr 15;352(6283):277-8. doi: 10.1126/science.352.6283.277.
8
Multinational teams and diseconomies of scale in collaborative research.跨国团队与合作研究中的规模不经济
Sci Adv. 2015 Sep 18;1(8):e1500211. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500211. eCollection 2015 Sep.
9
Geographies of an Online Social Network.一个在线社交网络的地域分布
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 11;10(9):e0137248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137248. eCollection 2015.
10
The Continuing Growth of Global Cooperation Networks in Research: A Conundrum for National Governments.全球研究合作网络的持续增长:各国政府面临的难题
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 21;10(7):e0131816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131816. eCollection 2015.