Teichfischer Philipp
Fachbereich Geschichte, Ethik und Theorie der Medizin, Medizinische Fakultät der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Germany.
Forsch Komplementmed. 2012;19(6):311-8. doi: 10.1159/000346001. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
The increasing demand for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) raises ethical questions about specific aspects of both CAM and conventional medicine (COM).
The present article provides a critical survey of the most important ethical aspects in the current debate about CAM.
The relevant ethical issues arise mainly in 4 main areas: 1) patient information, 2) research ethics, 3) cost, and 4) education. Most of the contributions used for our purpose are based upon the implicit assumption that, in principle, the ethics of CAM and COM have to be identical because of the same underlying doctor-patient relationship. This premise is shared by the author.
Substantial efforts on various levels will have to be made in order to create the conditions necessary for CAM to be ethically justified. But the ethical implications for COM also have to be considered.
对补充替代医学(CAM)需求的不断增加引发了关于CAM和传统医学(COM)特定方面的伦理问题。
本文对当前关于CAM的辩论中最重要的伦理方面进行了批判性综述。
相关伦理问题主要出现在4个主要领域:1)患者信息,2)研究伦理,3)成本,4)教育。用于我们目的的大多数贡献基于这样一个隐含假设,即原则上,由于相同的医患关系基础,CAM和COM的伦理必须相同。作者认同这一前提。
必须在各个层面做出大量努力,以创造使CAM在伦理上合理的必要条件。但也必须考虑对COM的伦理影响。