Centre for Metrological Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (CIRME), University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Clin Chim Acta. 2013 Apr 18;419:15-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
Albumin is the major plasma protein and its determination is used for the prognostic assessment of several diseases. Clinical guidelines call for monitoring of serum albumin with specific target cut-offs that are independent of the assay used. This requires accurate and equivalent results among different commercially available methods (i.e., result standardization) through a consistent definition and application of a reference measurement system. This should be associated with the definition of measurement uncertainty goals based on medical relevance of serum albumin to make results reliable for patient management. In this paper, we show that, in the current situation, if one applies analytical goals for serum albumin measurement derived from its biologic variation, the uncertainty budget derived from each step of the albumin traceability chain is probably too high to fulfil established quality levels for albumin measurement and to guarantee the accuracy needed for clinical usefulness of the test. The situation is further worsened if non-specific colorimetric methods are used for albumin measurement as they represent an additional random source of uncertainty.
白蛋白是主要的血浆蛋白,其测定用于几种疾病的预后评估。临床指南要求监测血清白蛋白,具体的目标切点应独立于所用的检测方法。这需要通过一致的参考测量系统定义和应用,在不同商业上可获得的方法之间获得准确且等效的结果(即,结果标准化)。这应与根据血清白蛋白对患者管理的医学相关性定义测量不确定度目标相关联,以使结果可靠。在本文中,我们表明,在当前情况下,如果应用源于白蛋白生物学变异的血清白蛋白测量分析目标,则白蛋白溯源链中每一步的不确定度预算可能过高,无法满足白蛋白测量的既定质量水平,并保证测试的临床有用性所需的准确性。如果使用非特异性比色法测量白蛋白,情况会进一步恶化,因为它们代表了不确定度的额外随机来源。