• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型根管冲洗剂Q Mix™ 2合1生物相容性的体内研究评估

Evaluation of biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant Q Mix™ 2 in 1- An in vivo study.

作者信息

Chandrasekhar Veeramachaneni, Amulya Vanapatla, Rani Vanapatla Swaroopa, Prakash T Jaya, Ranjani A Siva, Gayathri Ch

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Mamata Dental College, Khammam, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2013 Jan;16(1):36-40. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.105296.

DOI:10.4103/0972-0707.105296
PMID:23349574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3548343/
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant Q mix™ 2 in 1 in comparison to 0.9% sterile saline, 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six circles were drawn on the dorsal skin of 24 male Wistar Albino rats, leaving 2cm between each circle. Using a syringe, 0.1mL of each root canal irrigant was injected subcutaneously into five circles. In the sixth circle, the needle of an empty syringe was introduced into the skin, but no irrigant was injected (control group). Evaluations were done at 2 hours, 48 hours, 14 days, and 30 days postprocedure. Tissue samples were excised, embedded in paraffin blocks, and 3 μm thick sections were obtained and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The areas of inflammatory reaction were evaluated. From each tissue sample, five sections presenting the greatest inflammatory reactions were examined under a light microscope, and analyzed statistically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test.

RESULTS

At the two-hour examination period, all the irrigants showed a slight increase in the number of inflammatory cells, at 48 hours, the number of inflammatory cells were increased significantly, and after 14 and 30 days, they were decreased gradually. Qmix™ 2 in 1 showed a smaller number of inflammatory cells than other irrigants tested.

CONCLUSION

QMix™ 2 in 1 was shown to be less toxic to the rat subcutaneous tissue than 3% NaOCl, 2% CHX, and 17% EDTA.

摘要

目的

评估新型根管冲洗剂Q mix™ 2合1与0.9%无菌生理盐水、3%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)、2%氯己定(CHX)和17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)相比的生物相容性。

材料与方法

在24只雄性Wistar白化大鼠的背部皮肤绘制6个圆圈,每个圆圈之间间隔2cm。使用注射器将0.1mL每种根管冲洗剂皮下注射到5个圆圈中。在第6个圆圈中,将空注射器的针头刺入皮肤,但不注射冲洗剂(对照组)。在操作后2小时、48小时、14天和30天进行评估。切除组织样本,嵌入石蜡块,获得3μm厚的切片,并用苏木精和伊红染色。评估炎症反应区域。从每个组织样本中选取5个炎症反应最明显的切片,在光学显微镜下检查,并通过方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey检验进行统计学分析。

结果

在两小时的检查期,所有冲洗剂的炎症细胞数量均略有增加,在48小时时,炎症细胞数量显著增加,在14天和30天后逐渐减少。Q mix™ 2合1的炎症细胞数量比其他测试冲洗剂少。

结论

与3% NaOCl、2% CHX和17% EDTA相比,QMix™ 2合1对大鼠皮下组织的毒性较小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1099/3548343/5179f8e438e3/JCD-16-36-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1099/3548343/9eb508e708a3/JCD-16-36-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1099/3548343/5179f8e438e3/JCD-16-36-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1099/3548343/9eb508e708a3/JCD-16-36-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1099/3548343/5179f8e438e3/JCD-16-36-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant Q Mix™ 2 in 1- An in vivo study.新型根管冲洗剂Q Mix™ 2合1生物相容性的体内研究评估
J Conserv Dent. 2013 Jan;16(1):36-40. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.105296.
2
Comparison of the biocompatibility of different root canal irrigants.不同根管冲洗剂生物相容性的比较
J Appl Oral Sci. 2008 Mar-Apr;16(2):137-44. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572008000200011.
3
Combined and independent cytotoxicity of sodium hypochlorite, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and chlorhexidine.次氯酸钠、乙二胺四乙酸和氯己定的联合及独立细胞毒性
Int Endod J. 2016 Aug;49(8):764-73. doi: 10.1111/iej.12517. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
4
Biocompatibility of the 8.25% sodium hypochlorite irrigant solution in endodontics: An in vivo study.8.25%次氯酸钠冲洗液在牙髓病学中的生物相容性:一项体内研究。
Microsc Res Tech. 2021 Jul;84(7):1506-1512. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23706. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
5
Effect of the combination of several irrigants on dentine surface properties, adsorption of chlorhexidine and adhesion of microorganisms to dentine.几种冲洗剂联合使用对牙本质表面特性、氯己定吸附及微生物对牙本质黏附的影响。
Int Endod J. 2018 Dec;51(12):1420-1433. doi: 10.1111/iej.12960. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
6
Exploring Periostracum as an Alternative Root Canal Irrigant: Insights From Zebrafish Embryo Experiments.探索骨膜作为一种替代性根管冲洗剂:来自斑马鱼胚胎实验的见解。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 21;16(3):e56638. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56638. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Effect of Imidazolium-Based Silver Nanoparticles on Root Dentin Roughness in Comparison with Three Common Root Canal Irrigants.基于咪唑鎓的银纳米颗粒与三种常见根管冲洗剂相比对牙根牙本质粗糙度的影响
Iran Endod J. 2017 Winter;12(1):83-86. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.17.
8
Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of QMix™ 2 in 1, sodium hypochlorite, and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans.QMix™ 2 in 1、次氯酸钠和氯己定对粪肠球菌和白色念珠菌抗菌效果的比较评估
J Conserv Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;18(2):128-31. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.153067.
9
[Chlorhexidine as a root canal irrigant--antimicrobial and scanning electron microscopic evaluation].[洗必泰作为根管冲洗剂——抗菌及扫描电子显微镜评估]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2010 Sep-Oct;138(9-10):557-63. doi: 10.2298/sarh1010557p.
10
Effect of intracanal irrigants on the bond strength of epoxy resin-based and methacrylate resin-based sealers to root canal walls.根管冲洗剂对基于环氧树脂和甲基丙烯酸树脂的封闭剂与根管壁之间粘结强度的影响。
Int Endod J. 2012 Jan;45(1):42-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01945.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
An Investigation of the Sealing Ability of Biodentine and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate as Retrofilling Materials after the use of Various Irrigating Solutions.使用不同冲洗液后,对生物陶瓷和三氧化矿物凝聚体作为根管倒充填材料的封闭能力的研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022 Jul;14(Suppl 1):S563-S567. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_687_21. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
2
Effect of Qmix 2in1, chlorhexidine gluconate, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on postoperative pain after root canal treatment: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.Qmix 2in1、葡萄糖酸氯己定和乙二胺四乙酸对根管治疗术后疼痛的影响:一项双盲随机临床试验。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2022 Winter;16(1):70-75. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2022.011. Epub 2022 May 29.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of QMix, an experimental antibacterial root canal irrigant, on removal of canal wall smear layer and debris.QMix 作为一种实验性抗菌根管冲洗剂对去除根管壁玷污层和碎屑的效果。
J Endod. 2011 Jan;37(1):80-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.10.004.
2
Irrigation in endodontics.牙髓病学中的冲洗
Dent Clin North Am. 2010 Apr;54(2):291-312. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2009.12.001.
3
Rat subcutaneous tissue response to modified Portland cement, a new mineral trioxide aggregate.大鼠皮下组织对新型三氧化矿物凝聚体——改良波特兰水泥的反应。
Comparative effects of Er:YAG laser, and EDTA, MTAD, and QMix irrigants on adhesion of stem cells from the apical papilla to dentin: A scanning electron microscopic study.
铒激光、乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)、甲基丙烯酸甲酯-四环素-酸性磷酸酶(MTAD)和QMix冲洗液对根尖乳头干细胞与牙本质黏附的比较作用:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
J Clin Exp Dent. 2022 Apr 1;14(4):e310-e315. doi: 10.4317/jced.59129. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
Comparison of MTA versus Biodentine in Apexification Procedure for Nonvital Immature First Permanent Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial.MTA与生物活性玻璃在非活髓未成熟第一恒磨牙根尖诱导成形术中的比较:一项随机临床试验
Children (Basel). 2022 Mar 14;9(3):410. doi: 10.3390/children9030410.
5
The effects of QMix and EndoActivator on postoperative pain in mandibular molars with nonvital pulps: a randomized clinical trial.QMix 和 EndoActivator 对下颌磨牙残髓牙术后疼痛的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Nov;23(11):4173-4180. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02856-6. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
6
Cytotoxicity of Endodontic Irrigants on Human Periodontal Ligament Cells.根管冲洗剂对人牙周膜细胞的细胞毒性
Iran Endod J. 2018 Summer;13(3):390-394. doi: 10.22037/iej.v13i3.20438.
7
[Research progress on QMix properties in root canal irrigation].[根管冲洗液QMix性能的研究进展]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 1;35(5):543-548. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2017.05.019.
8
Evaluation of Cytotoxic Effects of Various Endodontic Irrigation Solutions on the Survival of Stem Cell of Human Apical Papilla.不同根管冲洗液对人根尖乳头干细胞存活的细胞毒性作用评估
Iran Endod J. 2016 Fall;11(4):293-297. doi: 10.22037/iej.2016.7.
9
Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity of QMiX, 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite, 2% Chlorhexidine, Guava Leaf Extract and Aloevera Extract Against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans - An in-vitro Study.QMiX、2.5%次氯酸钠、2%氯己定、番石榴叶提取物和芦荟提取物对粪肠球菌和白色念珠菌抗菌活性的比较评价——一项体外研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 May;10(5):ZC20-3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17705.7747. Epub 2016 May 1.
10
Effect of different final irrigating solutions on smear layer removal in apical third of root canal: A scanning electron microscope study.不同终末冲洗液对根管根尖三分之一处玷污层去除效果的扫描电子显微镜研究
J Conserv Dent. 2016 Jan-Feb;19(1):87-90. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.173207.
Braz Dent J. 2009;20(2):112-7. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402009000200004.
4
The properties and applications of chlorhexidine in endodontics.洗必泰在牙髓病学中的特性与应用。
Int Endod J. 2009 Apr;42(4):288-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01540.x. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
5
Comparison of the biocompatibility of different root canal irrigants.不同根管冲洗剂生物相容性的比较
J Appl Oral Sci. 2008 Mar-Apr;16(2):137-44. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572008000200011.
6
Root canal irrigants.根管冲洗剂
J Endod. 2006 May;32(5):389-98. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.014.
7
Chelating agents in root canal treatment: mode of action and indications for their use.根管治疗中的螯合剂:作用方式及其使用指征
Int Endod J. 2003 Dec;36(12):810-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2003.00754.x.
8
Cytotoxicity testing of endodontic sealers: a new method.根管封闭剂的细胞毒性测试:一种新方法。
J Endod. 2003 Sep;29(9):583-6. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200309000-00010.
9
Comparison of antibacterial and toxic effects of various root canal irrigants.不同根管冲洗剂的抗菌及毒性作用比较
Int Endod J. 2003 Jun;36(6):423-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00673.x.
10
The effect of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine on cultured human periodontal ligament cells.次氯酸钠和氯己定对培养的人牙周膜细胞的影响。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Oct;92(4):446-50. doi: 10.1067/moe.2001.116812.