• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同根管冲洗剂的抗菌及毒性作用比较

Comparison of antibacterial and toxic effects of various root canal irrigants.

作者信息

Onçağ O, Hoşgör M, Hilmioğlu S, Zekioğlu O, Eronat C, Burhanoğlu D

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics, Dental Faculty, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2003 Jun;36(6):423-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00673.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00673.x
PMID:12801290
Abstract

AIM

To compare the antibacterial properties and toxicity of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate plus 0.2% cetrimide (Cetrexidin); Vebas, San Giuliano, Milan, Italy).

METHODOLOGY

The antibacterial effects of the irrigants in vitro were examined after 5 min and 48 h in freshly extracted human teeth with single roots, whose canals were infected by Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212. In a separate in vivo study, bacterial culture samples were collected before treatment from the infected root canals of deciduous teeth containing necrotic pulp tissue. Irrigants were used to clean the canals which were then left empty for 48 h. Aerobic/facultative anaerobic and anaerobic bacterial growth were compared before and 48 h after irrigation. Finally, the toxic effects of the irrigants were assessed by injecting them into the subcutaneous tissues of rats. The inflammatory reactions that occurred 2 h, 48 h and 2 weeks after the injections were evaluated.

RESULTS

In the laboratory study, the 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and Cetrexidin were significantly more effective on E. faecalis than the 5.25% NaOCl at 5 min (P < 0.05). Similarly, in the in vivo study, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and Cetrexidin were significantly more effective on anaerobic bacteria than the 5.25% NaOCl at 48 h (P < 0.05). At the end of 2 weeks, the toxicity of the NaOCl solution was greater than that of the other irrigants (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Cetrexidin and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate were more effective, and had more residual antibacterial effects and lower toxicity than 5.25% NaOCl solution.

摘要

目的

比较5.25%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)、2%葡萄糖酸氯己定和0.2%葡萄糖酸氯己定加0.2%西曲溴铵(西曲碘铵)的抗菌性能和毒性(意大利米兰圣朱利亚诺的韦巴斯)。

方法

在体外,对根管被粪肠球菌ATCC 29212感染的新鲜拔除的单根人牙,分别在5分钟和48小时后检查冲洗剂的抗菌效果。在另一项体内研究中,从含有坏死牙髓组织的乳牙感染根管中,在治疗前收集细菌培养样本。使用冲洗剂清洁根管,然后保持空置48小时。比较冲洗前和冲洗后48小时需氧/兼性厌氧和厌氧细菌的生长情况。最后,通过将冲洗剂注射到大鼠皮下组织来评估其毒性作用。评估注射后2小时、48小时和2周出现的炎症反应。

结果

在实验室研究中,在5分钟时,2%葡萄糖酸氯己定和西曲碘铵对粪肠球菌的效果明显优于5.25% NaOCl(P < 0.05)。同样,在体内研究中,在48小时时,2%葡萄糖酸氯己定和西曲碘铵对厌氧菌的效果明显优于5.25% NaOCl(P < 0.05)。在2周结束时,NaOCl溶液的毒性大于其他冲洗剂(P < 0.05)。

结论

与5.25% NaOCl溶液相比,西曲碘铵和2%葡萄糖酸氯己定更有效,具有更强的残余抗菌作用且毒性更低。

相似文献

1
Comparison of antibacterial and toxic effects of various root canal irrigants.不同根管冲洗剂的抗菌及毒性作用比较
Int Endod J. 2003 Jun;36(6):423-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00673.x.
2
[Alpha-hemolytic streptococci and root canal irrigants. An evaluation of the bactericidal efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate plus cetrimide].[甲型溶血性链球菌与根管冲洗剂。次氯酸钠和葡萄糖酸氯己定加西曲溴铵杀菌效果的评估]
Minerva Stomatol. 1998 Sep;47(9):367-71.
3
[A comparative in-vitro study of the bactericidal efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate plus cetrimide on root canal anaerobic bacterial flora].次氯酸钠与葡萄糖酸氯己定加溴化十六烷基三甲铵对根管厌氧细菌菌群杀菌效果的体外比较研究
Minerva Stomatol. 1998 Sep;47(9):381-6.
4
Antimicrobial activity of root canal irrigants associated with cetrimide against biofilm and planktonic Enterococcus faecalis.与西曲溴铵相关的根管冲洗剂对粪肠球菌生物膜和浮游菌的抗菌活性。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Sep 1;15(5):603-7. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1586.
5
Antimicrobial effect of MTAD, Tetraclean, Cloreximid, and sodium hypochlorite on three common endodontic pathogens.MTAD、Tetraclean、Cloreximid和次氯酸钠对三种常见牙髓病病原体的抗菌作用。
Indian J Dent Res. 2009 Jul-Sep;20(3):391. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.57353.
6
An in vitro comparison of antimicrobial effcacy of three root canal irrigants-BioPure MTAD, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as a final rinse against E. faecalis.三种根管冲洗剂——BioPure MTAD、2%葡萄糖酸氯己定和5.25%次氯酸钠作为最终冲洗剂对粪肠球菌抗菌效果的体外比较。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Sep 1;14(5):842-7. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1413.
7
Residual effectiveness of final irrigation regimens on Enteroccus faecalis-infected root canals.最终冲洗方案对粪肠球菌感染根管的残留效果。
J Endod. 2011 Aug;37(8):1121-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.003.
8
Elimination of E. faecalis with NaOCl versus chlorhexidine gluconate from primary molar root canal systems: an ex vivo model study.使用次氯酸钠与葡萄糖酸氯己定消除乳磨牙根管系统中粪肠球菌的体外模型研究
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Apr 23;28(5):265. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05621-6.
9
The effect of detergents on the antibacterial activity of disinfecting solutions in dentin.清洁剂对牙本质中消毒剂抗菌活性的影响。
J Endod. 2012 Jul;38(7):948-53. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
10
An evaluation of the action of different root canal irrigants on facultative aerobic-anaerobic, obligate anaerobic, and microaerophilic bacteria.
J Endod. 1999 May;25(5):351-3. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81170-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibacterial efficacy of quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs) against Enterococcus faecalis in endodontic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.季铵化合物(QACs)对牙髓感染中粪肠球菌的抗菌效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Aug 7;25(1):1301. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06573-3.
2
Chlorhexidine Gluconate in Pediatric Endodontic Treatment: A Scoping Review.葡萄糖酸氯己定在儿童牙髓病治疗中的应用:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2025 Mar 12;17(3):e80445. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80445. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
The Effect of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound on Intracanal Bacterial Reduction, Chemical Structure, and Mechanical Properties of Root Dentine.
高强度聚焦超声对根管内细菌减少、牙本质根化学结构及力学性能的影响
Eur Endod J. 2025 Mar;10(2):116-126. doi: 10.14744/eej.2024.77487.
4
Evaluation of various root canal irrigation methods in primary teeth: a systematic review.乳牙中各种根管冲洗方法的评估:一项系统评价。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 21;24(1):1535. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05164-y.
5
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Etidronic Acid against in Primary Teeth: An Study.依替膦酸对乳牙的抗菌效果评估:一项体外研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Apr;17(4):433-436. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2834.
6
Endodontic irrigants from a comprehensive perspective.从综合角度看根管冲洗剂
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Jul 26;12(21):4460-4468. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i21.4460.
7
Antimicrobial Efficacy of Saline, Chlorhexidine, and Zataria Multiflora and Mentha Piperita Essential Oils in Root Canal Irrigation of Primary Molars.生理盐水、氯己定、伊朗藏红花和薄荷精油在乳磨牙根管冲洗中的抗菌效果
Front Dent. 2024 Jun 2;21:19. doi: 10.18502/fid.v21i19.15682. eCollection 2024.
8
Antimicrobial effect of herbal and conventional root canal endodontic irrigants against persistent pathogens.草药和传统根管牙髓冲洗剂对持续性病原体的抗菌作用。
Bioinformation. 2023 Dec 31;19(13):1312-1317. doi: 10.6026/973206300191312. eCollection 2023.
9
Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Chemical and Phytomedicinal Agents When Used As Intracanal Irrigants: An In Vitro Study.化学药剂与植物药作为根管冲洗剂时抗菌效果的比较评价:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2023 Nov 13;15(11):e48754. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48754. eCollection 2023 Nov.
10
Traditional and Recent Root Canal Irrigation Methods and Their Effectiveness: A Review.传统及近期根管冲洗方法及其有效性:综述
Clin Pract. 2023 Aug 27;13(5):1059-1072. doi: 10.3390/clinpract13050094.