• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在临床实践中,与理想的研究环境相比,FDG-PET/CT 中 SUV 的变异更大。

Variance of SUVs for FDG-PET/CT is greater in clinical practice than under ideal study settings.

机构信息

Department of Imaging, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612-9416, USA.

出版信息

Clin Nucl Med. 2013 Mar;38(3):175-82. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318279ffdf.

DOI:10.1097/RLU.0b013e318279ffdf
PMID:23354032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3578161/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Measurement variance affects the clinical effectiveness of PET-based measurement as a semiquantitative imaging biomarker for cancer response in individual patients and for planning clinical trials. In this study, we measured test-retest reproducibility of SUV measurements under clinical practice conditions and recorded recognized deviations from protocol compliance.

METHODS

Instrument performance calibration, display, and analyses conformed to manufacture recommendations. Baseline clinical (18)F-FDG PET/CT examinations were performed and then repeated at 1 to 7 days. Intended scan initiation uptake period was to repeat the examinations at the same time for each study after injection of 12 mCi FDG tracer. Avidity of uptake was measured in 62 tumors in 21 patients as SUV for maximum voxel (SUV(max)) and for a mean of sampled tumor voxels (SUV(mean)).

RESULTS

The range of SUV(max) and SUV(mean) was 1.07 to 21.47 and 0.91 to 14.69, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient between log of SUV(max) and log of SUV(mean) was 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.95) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.87-0.95), respectively.Correlation analysis failed to show an effect on uptake period variation on SUV measurements between the 2 examinations, suggesting additional sources of noise.The threshold criteria for relative difference from baseline for the 95% CI were ± 49% or ± 44% for SUV(max) or SUV(mean), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Variance of SUV for FDG-PET/CT in current clinical practice in a single institution was greater than expected when compared with benchmarks reported under stringent efficacy study settings. Under comparable clinical practice conditions, interpretation of changes in tumor avidity in individuals and assumptions in planning clinical trials may be affected.

摘要

目的

测量变异会影响基于 PET 的测量作为癌症患者个体反应和临床试验计划的半定量成像生物标志物的临床效果。在这项研究中,我们测量了临床实践条件下 SUV 测量的复测再现性,并记录了与协议依从性的公认偏差。

方法

仪器性能校准、显示和分析符合制造商的建议。进行基线(18)F-FDG PET/CT 检查,然后在 1 至 7 天内重复进行。预期的扫描开始摄取期是在每个研究中注射 12 mCi FDG 示踪剂后,为每个研究同时重复检查。21 名患者的 62 个肿瘤的摄取活性分别以最大体素 SUV(max)和采样肿瘤体素的平均值 SUV(mean)来测量。

结果

SUV(max)和 SUV(mean)的范围分别为 1.07 至 21.47 和 0.91 至 14.69。SUV(max)和 SUV(mean)的对数之间的组内相关系数分别为 0.93(95%置信区间[CI],0.88-0.95)和 0.92(95% CI,0.87-0.95)。相关性分析表明,摄取期变化对两次检查之间的 SUV 测量没有影响,这表明存在其他噪声源。SUV(max)或 SUV(mean)的 95% CI 的基线相对差异的阈值标准分别为±49%或±44%。

结论

与严格疗效研究环境下报告的基准相比,在单一机构的当前临床实践中,FDG-PET/CT 的 SUV 变异大于预期。在可比的临床实践条件下,个体肿瘤活性变化的解释和临床试验计划的假设可能会受到影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4386/3578161/baad359ba64a/nihms426542f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4386/3578161/fdecf291e458/nihms426542f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4386/3578161/f63a49c3553f/nihms426542f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4386/3578161/15149459c6d1/nihms426542f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4386/3578161/9dfcf5fb709d/nihms426542f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4386/3578161/baad359ba64a/nihms426542f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4386/3578161/fdecf291e458/nihms426542f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4386/3578161/f63a49c3553f/nihms426542f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4386/3578161/15149459c6d1/nihms426542f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4386/3578161/9dfcf5fb709d/nihms426542f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4386/3578161/baad359ba64a/nihms426542f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Variance of SUVs for FDG-PET/CT is greater in clinical practice than under ideal study settings.在临床实践中,与理想的研究环境相比,FDG-PET/CT 中 SUV 的变异更大。
Clin Nucl Med. 2013 Mar;38(3):175-82. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318279ffdf.
2
Test-Retest Reproducibility of F-FDG PET/CT Uptake in Cancer Patients Within a Qualified and Calibrated Local Network.在合格和校准的本地网络内,癌症患者 F-FDG PET/CT 摄取的测试-重测可重复性。
J Nucl Med. 2019 May;60(5):608-614. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.209544. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
3
Assessment of interobserver reproducibility in quantitative 18F-FDG PET and CT measurements of tumor response to therapy.18F-FDG PET定量及CT测量肿瘤治疗反应的观察者间再现性评估。
J Nucl Med. 2009 Nov;50(11):1760-9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.063321. Epub 2009 Oct 16.
4
Functional imaging of lung cancer using dual energy CT: how does iodine related attenuation correlate with standardized uptake value of 18FDG-PET-CT?应用双能量 CT 对肺癌进行功能成像:碘相关衰减与 18FDG-PET-CT 的标准化摄取值有何相关性?
Eur Radiol. 2012 Jan;22(1):93-103. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2230-3. Epub 2011 Aug 7.
5
Ferret thoracic anatomy by 2-deoxy-2-(18F)fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) imaging.通过2-脱氧-2-(18F)氟-D-葡萄糖(18F-FDG)正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(18F-FDG PET/CT)成像对雪貂胸部解剖结构的研究。
ILAR J. 2012;53(1):E9-21. doi: 10.1093/ilar.53.1.9.
6
Standard uptake value and metabolic tumor volume of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT predict short-term outcome early in the course of chemoradiotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT 标准摄取值和代谢肿瘤体积可预测晚期非小细胞肺癌放化疗过程中早期的短期预后。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 Sep;38(9):1628-35. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1838-5. Epub 2011 May 27.
7
Test-Retest Variability in Lesion SUV and Lesion SUR in F-FDG PET: An Analysis of Data from Two Prospective Multicenter Trials.¹⁸F-FDG PET 中病变 SUV 和病变 SUR 的重测变异性:来自两项前瞻性多中心试验的数据分析
J Nucl Med. 2017 Nov;58(11):1770-1775. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.190736. Epub 2017 May 4.
8
Interobserver variability among measurements of the maximum and mean standardized uptake values on (18)F-FDG PET/CT and measurements of tumor size on diagnostic CT in patients with pulmonary tumors.肺肿瘤患者中,(18)F-FDG PET/CT上最大标准化摄取值和平均标准化摄取值测量以及诊断性CT上肿瘤大小测量的观察者间变异性。
Acta Radiol. 2010 Sep;51(7):782-8. doi: 10.3109/02841851.2010.497772.
9
Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET in nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer.代谢肿瘤负荷 18F-FDG PET 在非手术治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者中的预后价值。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Jan;39(1):27-38. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1934-6. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
10
Comparison of Standardized Uptake Values in Normal Structures Between PET/CT and PET/MRI in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital: A Prospective Study.三级儿童医院中PET/CT与PET/MRI正常结构标准化摄取值的比较:一项前瞻性研究
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Nov;205(5):1094-101. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14304.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual and Quantitative F-FDG PET Tumor-liver Ratio in Radioiodine Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Prognostic and Potential Predictive Value.放射性碘难治性分化型甲状腺癌的视觉和定量F-FDG PET肿瘤与肝脏比值:预后及潜在预测价值
Mol Imaging Biol. 2025 May 20. doi: 10.1007/s11307-025-02017-0.
2
Quantitative Ga-PSMA-11 PET and Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Following Lu-PSMA-617 (VISION Trial).镥[177Lu]-前列腺特异性膜抗原 617(VISION 试验)治疗后,转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者的定量 Ga-PSMA-11 PET 和临床结局。
Radiology. 2024 Aug;312(2):e233460. doi: 10.1148/radiol.233460.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Design considerations for using PET as a response measure in single site and multicenter clinical trials.使用 PET 作为单站点和多中心临床试验中的应答测量指标的设计考虑因素。
Acad Radiol. 2012 Feb;19(2):184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.10.008. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
2
Time to take health delivery research seriously.是时候认真对待卫生服务研究了。
JAMA. 2011 Jul 20;306(3):310-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1015.
3
From efficacy to effectiveness in the face of uncertainty: indication creep and prevention creep.面对不确定性,从疗效到有效性:适应症蔓延与预防蔓延
Comparative analysis of batch correction methods for FDG PET/CT using metabolic radiogenomic data of lung cancer patients.
基于肺癌患者代谢放射基因组学数据的 FDG PET/CT 批处理校正方法的比较分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 25;13(1):18247. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45296-9.
4
Precision of quantitative parameters of F-FDG PET/CT in a rabbit VX2 tumor model.F-FDG PET/CT定量参数在兔VX2肿瘤模型中的准确性
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Jun 1;13(6):3816-3826. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-1079. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
5
F-FDG PET/CT radiomics signature and clinical parameters predict progression-free survival in breast cancer patients: A preliminary study.F-FDG PET/CT影像组学特征与临床参数预测乳腺癌患者无进展生存期:一项初步研究
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 10;13:1149791. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1149791. eCollection 2023.
6
Incidence of PSMA PET thyroid incidentaloma depends on analysis method and tracer.PSMA PET 甲状腺偶发瘤的发生率取决于分析方法和示踪剂。
Eur Radiol. 2023 May;33(5):3377-3385. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09492-5. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
7
Dynamic alteration in SULmax predicts early pathological tumor response and short-term prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer treated with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.SULmax的动态变化可预测接受新辅助免疫化疗的非小细胞肺癌的早期病理肿瘤反应和短期预后。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Oct 6;10:1010672. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1010672. eCollection 2022.
8
Value-assessment of computer-assisted navigation strategies during percutaneous needle placement.计算机辅助导航策略在经皮穿刺针放置中的价值评估。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022 Oct;17(10):1775-1785. doi: 10.1007/s11548-022-02719-8. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
9
Method to determine the statistical technical variability of SUV metrics.确定SUV指标统计技术变异性的方法。
EJNMMI Phys. 2022 Jun 6;9(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40658-022-00470-2.
10
Synergistic impact of motion and acquisition/reconstruction parameters on F-FDG PET radiomic features in non-small cell lung cancer: Phantom and clinical studies.运动和采集/重建参数对非小细胞肺癌 F-FDG PET 影像组学特征的协同影响:体模和临床研究。
Med Phys. 2022 Jun;49(6):3783-3796. doi: 10.1002/mp.15615. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
JAMA. 2011 May 18;305(19):2005-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.650.
4
Detection and characterization of tumor changes in 18F-FDG PET patient monitoring using parametric imaging.使用参数成像技术检测和描述 18F-FDG PET 患者监测中的肿瘤变化。
J Nucl Med. 2011 Mar;52(3):354-61. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.080150.
5
Variations in clinical PET/CT operations: results of an international survey of active PET/CT users.临床正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描操作的变化:对活跃的正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描用户的国际调查结果。
J Nucl Med. 2011 Feb;52(2):303-10. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.079624. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
6
Quantifying and reducing the effect of calibration error on variability of PET/CT standardized uptake value measurements.量化和减少校准误差对 PET/CT 标准化摄取值测量变异性的影响。
J Nucl Med. 2011 Feb;52(2):218-24. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.083865. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
7
Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT.影响 PET/CT 定量示踪剂摄取的方差和偏差的仪器因素。
Med Phys. 2010 Nov;37(11):6035-46. doi: 10.1118/1.3499298.
8
Repeatability of metabolically active volume measurements with 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT PET in non-small cell lung cancer.18F-FDG 和 18F-FLT PET 代谢活跃体积测量在非小细胞肺癌中的重复性。
J Nucl Med. 2010 Dec;51(12):1870-7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.077255. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
9
Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium.多中心协作组内 PET 定量的可变性。
Med Phys. 2010 Jul;37(7):3660-6. doi: 10.1118/1.3455705.
10
Quantitative analysis of PET studies.正电子发射断层扫描研究的定量分析。
Radiother Oncol. 2010 Sep;96(3):308-10. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.07.004. Epub 2010 Jul 23.