Suppr超能文献

人类肾移植活检中 T 细胞介导排斥反应的分子诊断。

Molecular diagnosis of T cell-mediated rejection in human kidney transplant biopsies.

机构信息

Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2013 Mar;13(3):645-55. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12079. Epub 2013 Jan 28.

Abstract

Histologic diagnosis of T cell-mediated rejection is flawed by subjective assessments, nonspecific lesions and arbitrary rules. This study developed a molecular test for T cell-mediated rejection. We used microarray results from 403 kidney transplant biopsies to derive a classifier assigning T cell-mediated rejection scores to all biopsies, and compared these with histologic assessments. The score correlated with histologic lesions of T cell-mediated rejection (infiltrate, tubulitis). The accuracy of the classifier for the histology diagnoses was 89%. Very high and low molecular scores corresponded with unanimity among three pathologists on the presence or absence of T cell-mediated rejection, respectively. The molecular score had low sensitivity (50%) and positive predictive value (62%) for the histology diagnoses. However, histology showed similar disagreement between pathologists--only 45-56% sensitivity of one pathologist with diagnoses of T cell-mediated rejection by another. Discrepancies between molecular scores and histology were mostly when histology was ambiguous ("borderline") or unreliable, e.g. in cases with scarring or inflammation induced by tissue injury. Vasculitis (isolated v-lesion TCMR) was particularly discrepant, with most cases exhibiting low TCMR scores. We propose new rules to integrate molecular tests and histology into a precision diagnostic system that can reduce errors, ambiguity and interpathologist disagreement.

摘要

组织学诊断的 T 细胞介导的排斥反应是有缺陷的,因为存在主观评估、非特异性病变和任意规则。本研究开发了一种用于 T 细胞介导的排斥反应的分子检测方法。我们使用了 403 例肾移植活检的微阵列结果,得出了一个将 T 细胞介导的排斥反应评分分配给所有活检的分类器,并将其与组织学评估进行了比较。该评分与 T 细胞介导的排斥反应的组织学病变(浸润、肾小管炎)相关。分类器对组织学诊断的准确性为 89%。非常高和低的分子评分分别对应于三位病理学家对 T 细胞介导的排斥反应存在或不存在的一致意见。该分子评分对组织学诊断的敏感性(50%)和阳性预测值(62%)较低。然而,组织学表现出病理学家之间的相似分歧——只有 45-56%的敏感性的病理学家与另一位病理学家的 T 细胞介导的排斥反应诊断一致。分子评分与组织学之间的差异主要发生在组织学存在歧义(“边界”)或不可靠的情况下,例如在疤痕形成或组织损伤引起的炎症的情况下。血管炎(孤立的 v 病变 TCMR)尤其存在差异,大多数病例的 TCMR 评分较低。我们提出了新的规则,将分子检测和组织学整合到一个精确的诊断系统中,可以减少错误、歧义以及病理学家之间的分歧。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验