Suppr超能文献

衡量手术室的安全性和效率:评估手术室任务执行情况的度量标准的制定和验证。

Measuring safety and efficiency in the operating room: development and validation of a metric for evaluating task execution in the operating room.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Mar;216(3):472-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.013. Epub 2013 Jan 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although a number of validated tools are available for assessing nontechnical skills and teamwork in the operating room (OR), there are no tools for measuring completion of key OR tasks, which is fundamental to effective teamwork, patient safety, and OR efficiency. This study describes the development and content validation of a new tool (ie, the Metric for Evaluating Task Execution in the Operating Room) for measuring basic task completion during surgical procedures.

STUDY DESIGN

The content validity of 106 OR tasks was assessed using 50 real-time observations of general surgical procedures, followed by a process of expert consensus. A panel of 15 OR experts (ie, surgeons, anesthesiologists, and OR nurses) were asked to rate all tasks observed in <70% of procedures for relevance to patient safety and OR efficiency (using scientifically accepted definitions). Tasks rated highly were retained. Those perceived less relevant were removed. A second panel of patient-safety experts refined the tool to remove duplication, ensure usability, and include novel tasks.

RESULTS

Twenty-four of the original 106 tasks were observed in <70% of cases. Seven of these were rated highly by the OR experts for relevance to patient safety and efficiency and were retained in the Metric for Evaluating Task Execution in the Operating Room. Of the remaining 17, four were retained and 13 were removed by the patient-safety experts. In the final revision phase, an additional 23 tasks were removed and 10 new tasks added. The final tool consists of 80 OR tasks relating to well-established processes of care.

CONCLUSIONS

The Metric for Evaluating Task Execution in the Operating Room is easy to use and can identify specific gaps in safety and/or efficiency in OR processes. Next, we should examine its links with additional measures of OR performance, for example, patient outcomes, list cancellations/delays, and nontechnical skills.

摘要

背景

尽管有许多经过验证的工具可用于评估手术室(OR)中的非技术技能和团队合作,但目前还没有用于衡量关键 OR 任务完成情况的工具,而这对于有效的团队合作、患者安全和 OR 效率至关重要。本研究描述了一种新工具(即手术室任务执行度量工具)的开发和内容验证,该工具用于测量手术过程中的基本任务完成情况。

研究设计

使用 50 次普通外科手术的实时观察评估了 106 项 OR 任务的内容有效性,随后进行了专家共识过程。一个由 15 名 OR 专家(即外科医生、麻醉师和 OR 护士)组成的小组被要求对所有在<70%的手术中观察到的任务进行评估,以确定它们与患者安全和 OR 效率的相关性(使用科学接受的定义)。评分较高的任务被保留。那些被认为相关性较低的任务被删除。第二个患者安全专家小组对该工具进行了改进,以消除重复、确保可用性并纳入新任务。

结果

在<70%的病例中观察到原始 106 个任务中的 24 个。这 24 个任务中有 7 个被 OR 专家认为与患者安全和效率高度相关,并被保留在手术室任务执行度量工具中。在其余的 17 个任务中,有 4 个被保留,有 13 个被患者安全专家删除。在最终修订阶段,又删除了 23 个任务并添加了 10 个新任务。最终工具包括 80 个与既定护理流程相关的 OR 任务。

结论

手术室任务执行度量工具易于使用,可以识别 OR 流程中安全和/或效率方面的具体差距。下一步,我们应该研究其与 OR 绩效的其他衡量标准之间的联系,例如患者结局、清单取消/延迟和非技术技能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验