• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术室团队协作量化方法的系统评价

Systematic review of methods for quantifying teamwork in the operating theatre.

作者信息

Li N, Marshall D, Sykes M, McCulloch P, Shalhoub J, Maruthappu M

机构信息

Department of General Surgery Wexham Park Hospital Slough UK.

Department of Medicine Imperial College London London UK.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2018 Feb 15;2(2):42-51. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.40. eCollection 2018 Apr.

DOI:10.1002/bjs5.40
PMID:29951628
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5952378/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Teamwork in the operating theatre is becoming increasingly recognized as a major factor in clinical outcomes. Many tools have been developed to measure teamwork. Most fall into two categories: self-assessment by theatre staff and assessment by observers. A critical and comparative analysis of the validity and reliability of these tools is lacking.

METHODS

MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched following PRISMA guidelines. Content validity was assessed using measurements of inter-rater agreement, predictive validity and multisite reliability, and interobserver reliability using statistical measures of inter-rater agreement and reliability. Quantitative meta-analysis was deemed unsuitable.

RESULTS

Forty-eight articles were selected for final inclusion; self-assessment tools were used in 18 and observational tools in 28, and there were two qualitative studies. Self-assessment of teamwork by profession varied with the profession of the assessor. The most robust self-assessment tool was the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), although this failed to demonstrate multisite reliability. The most robust observational tool was the Non-Technical Skills (NOTECHS) system, which demonstrated both test-retest reliability (P > 0·09) and interobserver reliability (Rwg = 0·96).

CONCLUSION

Self-assessment of teamwork by the theatre team was influenced by professional differences. Observational tools, when used by trained observers, circumvented this.

摘要

背景

手术室团队协作日益被视为临床结果的一个主要因素。已经开发了许多工具来衡量团队协作。大多数工具分为两类:手术室工作人员的自我评估和观察者的评估。缺乏对这些工具的有效性和可靠性的批判性和比较性分析。

方法

按照PRISMA指南检索MEDLINE和Embase数据库。使用评分者间一致性、预测效度和多中心信度的测量方法评估内容效度,并使用评分者间一致性和信度的统计测量方法评估观察者间信度。定量荟萃分析被认为不合适。

结果

最终纳入48篇文章;18篇使用自我评估工具,28篇使用观察工具,还有两项定性研究。不同专业的手术室工作人员对团队协作的自我评估因评估者的专业不同而有所差异。最可靠的自我评估工具是安全态度问卷(SAQ),尽管它未能证明多中心信度。最可靠的观察工具是非技术技能(NOTECHS)系统,它显示了重测信度(P>0·09)和观察者间信度(Rwg=0·96)。

结论

手术室团队对团队协作的自我评估受专业差异影响。由经过培训的观察者使用观察工具可避免这一问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d055/5952378/06325f595229/BJS5-2-42-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d055/5952378/06325f595229/BJS5-2-42-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d055/5952378/06325f595229/BJS5-2-42-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic review of methods for quantifying teamwork in the operating theatre.手术室团队协作量化方法的系统评价
BJS Open. 2018 Feb 15;2(2):42-51. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.40. eCollection 2018 Apr.
2
Assessing the surgical skills of trainees in the operating theatre: a prospective observational study of the methodology.评估手术室受训者的手术技能:一种前瞻性观察研究方法。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Jan;15(1):i-xxi, 1-162. doi: 10.3310/hta15010.
3
RAS-NOTECHS: validity and reliability of a tool for measuring non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery settings.RAS-NOTECHS:一种用于测量机器人辅助手术环境中非技术技能的工具的有效性和可靠性。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):1916-1926. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08474-2. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
4
Oxford NOTECHS II: a modified theatre team non-technical skills scoring system.牛津非技术技能评估系统II:一种改良的手术室团队非技术技能评分系统。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 4;9(3):e90320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090320. eCollection 2014.
5
Measuring the teamwork performance of operating room teams: a systematic review of assessment tools and their measurement properties.测量手术室团队的团队合作绩效:评估工具及其测量特性的系统评价。
J Interprof Care. 2021 Jan-Feb;35(1):37-45. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1702931. Epub 2019 Dec 22.
6
Observational Tools That Quantify Nontechnical Skills in the Operating Room: A Systematic Review.观察工具在手术室量化非技术技能:系统评价。
J Surg Res. 2020 Mar;247:306-322. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.012. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
7
The effects of aviation-style non-technical skills training on technical performance and outcome in the operating theatre.航空式非技术技能培训对手术室技术操作及结果的影响。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Apr;18(2):109-15. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.032045.
8
A scoping review of nontechnical skill assessment tools to evaluate trauma team performance.一项关于评估创伤团队表现的非技术技能评估工具的范围综述。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 May 1;92(5):e81-e91. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003492. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
9
The Oxford NOTECHS System: reliability and validity of a tool for measuring teamwork behaviour in the operating theatre.牛津NOTECHS系统:一种用于测量手术室团队协作行为的工具的可靠性和有效性。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Apr;18(2):104-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024760.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

1
Importance of anesthesiologists' non-technical skills in the management of a case of life-threatening cardiac tamponade during robot-assisted thoracic surgery.麻醉医生的非技术技能在机器人辅助胸外科手术中处理一例危及生命的心包填塞病例中的重要性。
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2025 May;87(2):368-373. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.87.2.368.
2
Safety attitudes culture remain stable in a transplant center: evidence from the coronavirus pandemic.移植中心的安全态度文化保持稳定:来自新冠疫情的证据。
Front Transplant. 2023 Sep 26;2:1208916. doi: 10.3389/frtra.2023.1208916. eCollection 2023.
3
Patient and Operational Factors Do Not Substantively Affect the Annual Departmental Quality of Anesthesiologists' Clinical Supervision and Nurse Anesthetists' Work Habits.

本文引用的文献

1
Combining Systems and Teamwork Approaches to Enhance the Effectiveness of Safety Improvement Interventions in Surgery: The Safer Delivery of Surgical Services (S3) Program.结合系统和团队协作方法以提高手术安全改进干预措施的有效性:手术服务更安全交付(S3)计划
Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):90-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001589.
2
Teamwork Assessment Tools in Modern Surgical Practice: A Systematic Review.现代外科实践中的团队合作评估工具:一项系统综述。
Surg Res Pract. 2015;2015:494827. doi: 10.1155/2015/494827. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
3
The effect of teamwork training on team performance and clinical outcome in elective orthopaedic surgery: a controlled interrupted time series study.
患者因素和操作因素对麻醉医生临床监督的年度科室质量及麻醉护士的工作习惯没有实质性影响。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 1;16(3):e55346. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55346. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Measuring Healthcare Worker Satisfaction in the Operating Room.测量手术室医护人员的满意度。
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Jan 21;3(1):e129. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000129. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
Handoffs and the challenges to implementing teamwork training in the perioperative environment.围手术期环境中的交接班以及实施团队协作培训所面临的挑战。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 15;14:1187262. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1187262. eCollection 2023.
6
A Pilot Study of Heart Rate Variability Synchrony as a Marker of Intraoperative Surgical Teamwork and Its Correlation to the Length of Procedure.心率变异性同步性作为术中手术团队协作标志物的初步研究及其与手术时间长度的相关性。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 21;22(22):8998. doi: 10.3390/s22228998.
7
Improving Patient Safety Culture During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan.在 COVID-19 大流行期间改善台湾的患者安全文化。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 12;10:889870. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.889870. eCollection 2022.
8
Implementation of simulation-based crisis training in robotic thoracic surgery: how to improve safety and performance?基于模拟的危机培训在机器人辅助胸外科手术中的应用:如何提高安全性和性能?
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Aug;13(Suppl 1):S26-S34. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2020-epts-03.
9
RAS-NOTECHS: validity and reliability of a tool for measuring non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery settings.RAS-NOTECHS:一种用于测量机器人辅助手术环境中非技术技能的工具的有效性和可靠性。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):1916-1926. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08474-2. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
10
Trends in Shared Decision-Making Studies From 2009 to 2018: A Bibliometric Analysis.2009年至2018年共同决策研究的趋势:文献计量分析
Front Public Health. 2019 Dec 18;7:384. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00384. eCollection 2019.
团队协作培训对择期骨科手术团队绩效和临床结果的影响:一项对照间断时间序列研究
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 20;5(4):e006216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006216.
4
A systematic review of behavioural marker systems in healthcare: what do we know about their attributes, validity and application?行为标记系统在医疗保健中的系统评价:我们对其属性、有效性和应用了解多少?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Dec;23(12):1031-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002457. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
5
A combined teamwork training and work standardisation intervention in operating theatres: controlled interrupted time series study.联合手术团队培训和工作标准化干预在手术室中的应用:对照中断时间序列研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Feb;24(2):111-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003204. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
6
Assessing distractors and teamwork during surgery: developing an event-based method for direct observation.评估手术过程中的干扰因素与团队协作:开发一种基于事件的直接观察方法。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Nov;23(11):918-29. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002860. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
7
A comparative assessment and gap analysis of commonly used team rating scales.常用团队评分量表的比较评估和差距分析。
J Surg Res. 2014 Aug;190(2):445-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.04.034. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
8
Practicality of intraoperative teamwork assessments.术中团队协作评估的实用性。
J Surg Res. 2014 Jul;190(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.04.024. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
9
Oxford NOTECHS II: a modified theatre team non-technical skills scoring system.牛津非技术技能评估系统II:一种改良的手术室团队非技术技能评分系统。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 4;9(3):e90320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090320. eCollection 2014.
10
Impact of intraoperative distractions on patient safety: a prospective descriptive study using validated instruments.术中干扰对患者安全的影响:使用验证工具的前瞻性描述性研究。
World J Surg. 2014 Apr;38(4):751-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2315-z.