Suppr超能文献

口腔鳞状细胞癌中 EGFR 状态的比较:病例系列研究中免疫组织化学、FISH 和 CISH 检测。

EGFR status in oral squamous cell carcinoma: comparing immunohistochemistry, FISH and CISH detection in a case series study.

机构信息

Department of Oral Surgery and Pathology, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2013 Jan 28;3(1):e002077. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002077.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) with the gene amplification evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and their association with clinicopathological parameters. Additionally, we tested the sensibility and specificity of CISH in comparison with FISH.

DESIGN

Case series study

SETTING

Oral surgery and pathology department in a school of dentistry.

PARTICIPANTS

52 patients with histopathological diagnosis of OSCC.

METHODS

Tumour tissue samples from 52 patients with OSCC were evaluated by IHC, FISH and CISH using tissue microarray technology. Clinicopathological data from all patients were collected.

RESULTS

EGFR+ rates were 53.8% (28/52) by IHC, 5.8% (3/52) by CISH and 15.4% (8/52) by FISH. Amplification detected by CISH and FISH with IHC negative occurred in 3.8% (2/52), and one case (1.9%) showed amplification detected by CISH and FISH and protein overexpression concomitantly. There were 9.6% FISH+ cases with IHC and CISH negative rates and 6/8 (75%) FISH+ and also EGFR+ cases; however, an association between protein expression and gene amplification was not found for both techniques. IHC and FISH rates were not associated with clinicopathological features. CISH+ rates were associated with T3-T4 status. Compared with FISH assay, CISH reached a sensitivity of 37.5% and specificity of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no association between EGFR expression and gene amplification in OSCC when the IHC is driven to external epitopes of the protein. Although CISH demonstrates specificity, technical problems may influence sensibility when compared with FISH.

摘要

目的

比较口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)中表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的免疫组织化学(IHC)表达与荧光原位杂交(FISH)和显色原位杂交(CISH)评估的基因扩增及其与临床病理参数的关系。此外,我们还测试了 CISH 与 FISH 相比的敏感性和特异性。

设计

病例系列研究

设置

牙科学院口腔外科和病理学系。

参与者

52 名经组织病理学诊断为 OSCC 的患者。

方法

采用组织微阵列技术,对 52 例 OSCC 患者的肿瘤组织样本进行 IHC、FISH 和 CISH 检测。收集所有患者的临床病理数据。

结果

IHC 阳性率为 53.8%(28/52),CISH 为 5.8%(3/52),FISH 为 15.4%(8/52)。IHC 阴性而 CISH 和 FISH 检测到的扩增在 3.8%(2/52)中发生,1 例(1.9%)同时表现出 CISH 和 FISH 检测到的扩增和蛋白过表达。有 9.6%的 FISH+病例 IHC 和 CISH 阴性率,6/8(75%)的 FISH+和 EGFR+病例;然而,两种技术均未发现蛋白表达与基因扩增之间存在关联。IHC 和 FISH 率与临床病理特征无关。CISH+率与 T3-T4 状态有关。与 FISH 检测相比,CISH 的灵敏度为 37.5%,特异性为 100%。

结论

当 IHC 驱动蛋白的外部表位时,OSCC 中 EGFR 表达与基因扩增之间没有关联。虽然 CISH 表现出特异性,但与 FISH 相比,技术问题可能会影响敏感性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d6f/3563135/c2d284b63341/bmjopen2012002077f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验