• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体和联合物体操纵的高阶动作规划。

Higher-order action planning for individual and joint object manipulations.

机构信息

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2013 Apr;225(4):579-88. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3398-8. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-012-3398-8
PMID:23361302
Abstract

Many actions involve multiple action steps, which raises the question how far ahead people plan when they perform such actions. Here, we examined higher-order planning for action sequences and whether people planned similarly or differently when acting individually or together with an action partner. For individual performances, participants picked up an object with one hand and passed it to their other hand before placing it onto a target location. For joint performances, they picked up the object and handed it to their action partner, who placed it onto the target location. Each object could be grasped at only two possible grasping positions, implying that the first selected grasp on the object determined the postures for the rest of the action sequence. By varying the height of the target shelf, we tested whether people planned ahead and modulated their grasp choices to avoid uncomfortable end postures. Our results indicated that participants engaged in higher-order planning, but needed task experience before demonstrating such planning during both individual and joint performances. The rate of learning was similar in the two conditions, and participants transferred experience from individual to joint performance. Our results indicate similarity in mechanisms underlying individual and joint action sequence planning.

摘要

许多动作涉及多个动作步骤,这就提出了一个问题,即人们在执行此类动作时会提前计划多远。在这里,我们研究了动作序列的高阶规划,以及当人们单独行动或与行动伙伴一起行动时,他们的计划是否相似或不同。对于个人表演,参与者用一只手拿起物体,然后将其传递到另一只手,再将其放在目标位置上。对于联合表演,他们拿起物体并将其递给他们的动作伙伴,然后由动作伙伴将其放在目标位置上。每个物体只能在两个可能的抓握位置上抓握,这意味着对物体的第一次选择抓握决定了整个动作序列的其余姿势。通过改变目标支架的高度,我们测试了人们是否提前计划并调整了他们的抓握选择,以避免不舒服的结束姿势。我们的结果表明,参与者进行了高阶规划,但在个人和联合表演中都需要任务经验才能展示这种规划。两种情况下的学习速度相似,参与者将经验从个人表演转移到联合表演。我们的结果表明,个体和联合动作序列规划的机制相似。

相似文献

1
Higher-order action planning for individual and joint object manipulations.个体和联合物体操纵的高阶动作规划。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Apr;225(4):579-88. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3398-8. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
2
Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.个体在多段物体操纵任务中的运动规划差异。
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Oct;222(1-2):125-36. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3203-8. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
3
An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task.一项关于在物体操作任务中抓握行为和运动学的手动非对称的研究。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Nov;215(1):65-75. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2872-z. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
4
Dual-task interference in action programming and action planning - Evidence from the end-state comfort effect.动作编程和动作规划中的双重任务干扰——来自终点舒适效应的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Aug;228:103637. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103637. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
5
The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task.在三段物体操纵任务中减少中间目标约束对抓握姿势规划的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Feb;233(2):529-38. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4133-4. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
6
Grasp posture planning during multi-segment object manipulation tasks - interaction between cognitive and biomechanical factors.多节段物体操作任务中的抓握姿势规划——认知与生物力学因素之间的相互作用
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Nov;144(3):513-21. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
7
Inverting the planning gradient: adjustment of grasps to late segments of multi-step object manipulations.反转规划梯度:将抓握调整至多步骤物体操纵的后期阶段。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 May;235(5):1397-1409. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4892-9. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
8
Perturbations in action goal influence bimanual grasp posture planning.动作目标的扰动会影响双手抓握姿势的规划。
J Mot Behav. 2013;45(6):473-8. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2013.828677. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
9
The development of the grasp height effect as a measure of efficient action planning in children.作为衡量儿童有效动作规划指标的抓握高度效应的发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Jan;153:74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
10
Bidirectional transfer between joint and individual actions in a task of discrete force production.离散力产生任务中关节动作与个体动作之间的双向转移。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Jul;235(7):2259-2265. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4970-z. Epub 2017 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinct neural dynamics in joint versus side-by-side actions: insights from dual EEG.联合动作与并排动作中不同的神经动力学:来自双脑电图的见解
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025 Jan 18;20(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaf075.
2
Reading out bodily cues to predict interactions.解读身体信号以预测互动。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 29;15(1):18865. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01224-7.
3
Unveiling the invisible: receivers use object weight cues for grip force planning in handover actions.揭示无形之物:在交接动作中,接收者使用物体重量线索来规划握力。

本文引用的文献

1
Joint action: neurocognitive mechanisms supporting human interaction.联合行动:支持人际互动的神经认知机制
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Apr;1(2):340-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01023.x.
2
Predictive representation of other people's actions in joint action planning: an EEG study.共同动作规划中预测他人动作的表象:一项 EEG 研究。
Soc Neurosci. 2013;8(1):31-42. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2012.694823. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
3
Cognition, action, and object manipulation.认知、动作和物体操控。
Exp Brain Res. 2024 May;242(5):1191-1202. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06813-y. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
4
Grip selection without tool knowledge: end-state comfort effect in familiar and novel tool use.无工具知识的握持选择:熟悉和新颖工具使用中的末端状态舒适效应。
Exp Brain Res. 2023 Aug;241(8):1989-2000. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06655-0. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
5
A systematic review of handover actions in human dyads.对人类二元组中交接行为的系统评价。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 4;14:1147296. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1147296. eCollection 2023.
6
Infants expect agents to minimize the collective cost of collaborative actions.婴儿期望行为体将协作行为的总成本最小化。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 12;12(1):17088. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21452-5.
7
The influence of object size on second-order planning in an overturned cup task.物体大小对翻转杯子任务中二阶规划的影响。
Psychol Res. 2022 Mar;86(2):642-650. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01509-2. Epub 2021 Apr 4.
8
Rationality in Joint Action: Maximizing Coefficiency in Coordination.联合行动中的理性:协调中效率的最大化。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Jun;30(6):930-941. doi: 10.1177/0956797619842550. Epub 2019 May 14.
9
Multiple Frames of Reference Are Used During the Selection and Planning of a Sequential Joint Action.在连续联合行动的选择和规划过程中会使用多个参考框架。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 1;9:542. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00542. eCollection 2018.
10
How preschoolers and adults represent their joint action partner's behavior.学龄前儿童和成年人如何表现其共同行动伙伴的行为。
Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):863-877. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0929-8. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
Psychol Bull. 2012 Sep;138(5):924-46. doi: 10.1037/a0027839. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
4
Response selection during a joint action task.联合行动任务中的反应选择。
J Mot Behav. 2011;43(4):329-32. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2011.592871.
5
The joint flanker effect: sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors.共同动作突显性:与真实和想象中的共同执行者共同完成任务。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):371-85. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2709-9. Epub 2011 May 15.
6
Etiquette and effort: holding doors for others.礼仪与努力:为他人扶门。
Psychol Sci. 2011 May;22(5):584-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797611406444. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
7
Joint action modulates motor system involvement during action observation in 3-year-olds.共同动作调节三岁儿童在动作观察期间运动系统的参与。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):581-92. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2658-3. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
8
How a co-actor's task affects monitoring of own errors: evidence from a social event-related potential study.共同行为者的任务如何影响自身错误监控:来自社会事件相关电位研究的证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):397-404. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2615-1. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
9
Extending end-state comfort effect: do we consider the beginning state comfort of another?扩展终态舒适效应:我们是否考虑他人的初始状态舒适度?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Mar;136(3):347-53. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.12.009. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
10
Favouritism in the motor system: social interaction modulates action simulation.运动系统中的偏爱:社会互动调节动作模拟。
Biol Lett. 2010 Dec 23;6(6):758-61. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0478. Epub 2010 Jun 23.