Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 Jun;68(6):1348-53. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt006. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
Once-daily nucleoside-sparing combination antiretroviral therapy regimens are attractive options for the treatment of HIV infection. However, the pharmacokinetic profiles of such regimens are often not established.
HIV-infected subjects receiving 245/200 mg of tenofovir/emtricitabine plus 800/100 mg of darunavir/ritonavir once daily with plasma HIV RNA <50 copies/mL were eligible. On day 1 (period 1), 150 mg of maraviroc daily was added and on day 11 (period 2), tenofovir/emtricitabine discontinued. At steady-state (days 10 and 20), intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was undertaken. We assessed (i) the number of subjects with trough (C(trough)) and average (C(avg)) maraviroc concentrations <25 and <75 ng/mL, respectively; (ii) geometric mean (GM) ratios for pharmacokinetic parameters for period 2 versus period 1; and (iii) factors associated with total maraviroc exposure.
Eleven subjects completed the study procedures (mean age 49 years; range 35-59 years). In three subjects, maraviroc C(trough) and C(avg) were <25 and <75 ng/mL, respectively (C(avg), 68 ng/mL and C(trough), 14 and 21 ng/mL). Although not statistically significant, a trend was observed towards lower maraviroc, darunavir and ritonavir concentrations in period 2 versus period 1; total maraviroc exposure was 3579 ng· h/mL (95% CI: 2983-4294) and 2996 ng· h/mL (95% CI: 2374-3782) in periods 1 and 2, respectively, and the GM ratio was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.67-1.05). Only total ritonavir exposure was significantly associated with total maraviroc exposure (P=0.049; 95% CI: 0.01-0.91). No clinical safety concerns were observed.
Within this novel nucleoside-sparing regimen, maraviroc exposure is dependent on ritonavir exposure, which was slightly reduced in the absence of tenofovir/emtricitabine.
每日一次的核苷类药物节省型联合抗逆转录病毒治疗方案是治疗 HIV 感染的一种有吸引力的选择。然而,此类方案的药代动力学特征通常尚未确定。
符合条件的受试者正在接受每日一次 245/200mg 替诺福韦/恩曲他滨加 800/100mg 达芦那韦/利托那韦,血浆 HIV RNA<50 拷贝/ml。第 1 天(第 1 期)加用 150mg 马拉维若,第 11 天(第 2 期)停用替诺福韦/恩曲他滨。在稳态(第 10 天和第 20 天)时进行强化药代动力学采样。我们评估了:(i)分别有多少受试者的马拉维若谷浓度(C(trough))和平均浓度(C(avg))<25 和<75ng/ml;(ii)第 2 期与第 1 期相比的药代动力学参数的几何均数(GM)比值;以及(iii)与马拉维若总暴露相关的因素。
11 名受试者完成了研究程序(平均年龄 49 岁;范围 35-59 岁)。在 3 名受试者中,马拉维若 C(trough)和 C(avg)分别<25 和<75ng/ml(C(avg)为 68ng/ml,C(trough)为 14 和 21ng/ml)。虽然没有统计学意义,但观察到第 2 期与第 1 期相比,马拉维若、达芦那韦和利托那韦浓度呈下降趋势;第 1 期和第 2 期的马拉维若总暴露量分别为 3579ng·h/ml(95%CI:2983-4294)和 2996ng·h/ml(95%CI:2374-3782),GM 比值为 0.84(95%CI:0.67-1.05)。只有总利托那韦暴露与马拉维若总暴露显著相关(P=0.049;95%CI:0.01-0.91)。未观察到临床安全性问题。
在这种新型核苷类药物节省型方案中,马拉维若的暴露量取决于利托那韦的暴露量,而在没有替诺福韦/恩曲他滨的情况下,利托那韦的暴露量略有减少。