Suppr超能文献

作为衡量淋巴结清扫范围的指标,淋巴结计数的解剖学基础:一项尸体研究。

Anatomic basis for lymph node counts as measure of lymph node dissection extent: a cadaveric study.

机构信息

Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Urology. 2013 Feb;81(2):358-63. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the number, variability, and distribution of pelvic lymph nodes to better understand the utility of the node count as a surrogate for the dissection extent. Although pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at radical cystectomy for bladder cancer is critical for disease control and staging, debate regarding the measurement of dissection adequacy remains. Many have proposed minimum node counts, yet an anatomic study assessing the number and variability of lymph nodes in the PLND templates is lacking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Super-extended PLND was performed on 26 human cadavers, and the lymph nodes within each of 12 dissection zones were enumerated by a single pathologist. We calculated the mean, standard deviation, and range of nodal yield within each dissection region. The super-extended and standard dissection templates were compared using the paired t test.

RESULTS

Super-extended PLND yielded a mean of 28.5 ± 11.5 lymph nodes, with a total node count range of 10-53 nodes. In contrast, the nodal yield within the standard template was 18.3 ± 6.3 nodes, with a range of 8-28 nodes (P <.001). No significant differences were seen in lymph node counts when stratified by age, sex, or cause of death.

CONCLUSION

Using a cadaveric model and a single pathologist to eliminate many of the factors affecting the nodal yield in surgical series, we found substantial interindividual differences, with counts ranging from 10 to 53 nodes. These results have demonstrated the limited utility of lymph node count as a surrogate for the dissection extent and illustrated the challenges associated with implementing a surgical standard for minimum lymph node counts.

摘要

目的

确定盆腔淋巴结的数量、变异性和分布,以更好地了解淋巴结计数作为解剖范围替代物的效用。虽然膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术中的盆腔淋巴结清扫(PLND)对疾病控制和分期至关重要,但关于解剖充分性的测量仍存在争议。许多人提出了最小淋巴结计数,但缺乏评估 PLND 模板中淋巴结数量和变异性的解剖研究。

材料与方法

对 26 具人体尸体进行超扩展 PLND,由一名病理学家对 12 个解剖区的每个区的淋巴结进行计数。我们计算了每个解剖区域内淋巴结产量的平均值、标准差和范围。使用配对 t 检验比较超扩展和标准解剖模板。

结果

超扩展 PLND 的平均淋巴结产量为 28.5 ± 11.5 个,总淋巴结计数范围为 10-53 个。相比之下,标准模板内的淋巴结产量为 18.3 ± 6.3 个,范围为 8-28 个(P <.001)。按年龄、性别或死亡原因分层时,淋巴结计数无显著差异。

结论

使用尸体模型和一名病理学家消除了影响手术系列中淋巴结产量的许多因素,我们发现个体间存在很大差异,计数范围从 10 到 53 个。这些结果表明,淋巴结计数作为解剖范围的替代物的效用有限,并说明了实施最小淋巴结计数手术标准所面临的挑战。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验