• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为衡量淋巴结清扫范围的指标,淋巴结计数的解剖学基础:一项尸体研究。

Anatomic basis for lymph node counts as measure of lymph node dissection extent: a cadaveric study.

机构信息

Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Urology. 2013 Feb;81(2):358-63. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.025.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.025
PMID:23374802
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the number, variability, and distribution of pelvic lymph nodes to better understand the utility of the node count as a surrogate for the dissection extent. Although pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at radical cystectomy for bladder cancer is critical for disease control and staging, debate regarding the measurement of dissection adequacy remains. Many have proposed minimum node counts, yet an anatomic study assessing the number and variability of lymph nodes in the PLND templates is lacking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Super-extended PLND was performed on 26 human cadavers, and the lymph nodes within each of 12 dissection zones were enumerated by a single pathologist. We calculated the mean, standard deviation, and range of nodal yield within each dissection region. The super-extended and standard dissection templates were compared using the paired t test.

RESULTS

Super-extended PLND yielded a mean of 28.5 ± 11.5 lymph nodes, with a total node count range of 10-53 nodes. In contrast, the nodal yield within the standard template was 18.3 ± 6.3 nodes, with a range of 8-28 nodes (P <.001). No significant differences were seen in lymph node counts when stratified by age, sex, or cause of death.

CONCLUSION

Using a cadaveric model and a single pathologist to eliminate many of the factors affecting the nodal yield in surgical series, we found substantial interindividual differences, with counts ranging from 10 to 53 nodes. These results have demonstrated the limited utility of lymph node count as a surrogate for the dissection extent and illustrated the challenges associated with implementing a surgical standard for minimum lymph node counts.

摘要

目的

确定盆腔淋巴结的数量、变异性和分布,以更好地了解淋巴结计数作为解剖范围替代物的效用。虽然膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术中的盆腔淋巴结清扫(PLND)对疾病控制和分期至关重要,但关于解剖充分性的测量仍存在争议。许多人提出了最小淋巴结计数,但缺乏评估 PLND 模板中淋巴结数量和变异性的解剖研究。

材料与方法

对 26 具人体尸体进行超扩展 PLND,由一名病理学家对 12 个解剖区的每个区的淋巴结进行计数。我们计算了每个解剖区域内淋巴结产量的平均值、标准差和范围。使用配对 t 检验比较超扩展和标准解剖模板。

结果

超扩展 PLND 的平均淋巴结产量为 28.5 ± 11.5 个,总淋巴结计数范围为 10-53 个。相比之下,标准模板内的淋巴结产量为 18.3 ± 6.3 个,范围为 8-28 个(P <.001)。按年龄、性别或死亡原因分层时,淋巴结计数无显著差异。

结论

使用尸体模型和一名病理学家消除了影响手术系列中淋巴结产量的许多因素,我们发现个体间存在很大差异,计数范围从 10 到 53 个。这些结果表明,淋巴结计数作为解剖范围的替代物的效用有限,并说明了实施最小淋巴结计数手术标准所面临的挑战。

相似文献

1
Anatomic basis for lymph node counts as measure of lymph node dissection extent: a cadaveric study.作为衡量淋巴结清扫范围的指标,淋巴结计数的解剖学基础:一项尸体研究。
Urology. 2013 Feb;81(2):358-63. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.025.
2
Radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: survival of patients with lymph node metastasis above the bifurcation of the common iliac vessels treated with surgery only.根治性膀胱切除术和扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术:仅接受手术治疗的髂总血管分叉以上淋巴结转移患者的生存率。
J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 1):1218-23; discussion 1223-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.160. Epub 2007 Aug 14.
3
Applied anatomy of pelvic lymph nodes and its clinical significance for prostate cancer:a single-center cadaveric study.盆腔淋巴结的应用解剖及其在前列腺癌中的临床意义:一项单中心尸体研究。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Apr 16;20(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06833-1.
4
Super extended versus extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a comparative study.根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌患者中超级广泛与广泛盆腔淋巴结清扫术的比较研究。
J Urol. 2011 Oct;186(4):1261-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.06.004. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
5
Nodal counts during pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: an objective indicator of quality under the influence of very subjective factors.前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结清扫术中的淋巴结计数:受非常主观因素影响的质量客观指标。
BJU Int. 2012 May;109(9):1323-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10610.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
6
Robotic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer with increased nodal yield.机器人辅助扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗淋巴结转移风险增加的膀胱癌。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1802-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09789.x. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
7
Impact of separate versus en bloc pelvic lymph node dissection on the number of lymph nodes retrieved in cystectomy specimens.单独与整块盆腔淋巴结清扫对膀胱切除标本中获取淋巴结数量的影响。
J Urol. 2001 Dec;166(6):2295-6.
8
Removal of more lymph nodes may provide better outcome, as well as more accurate pathologic findings, in patients with bladder cancer--analysis of role of pelvic lymph node dissection.对于膀胱癌患者,切除更多淋巴结可能会带来更好的治疗效果以及更准确的病理结果——盆腔淋巴结清扫术作用的分析
Urology. 2006 Sep;68(3):543-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.049. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
9
Standard lymph node dissection for bladder cancer: significant variability in the number of reported lymph nodes.膀胱癌标准淋巴结清扫术:报道的淋巴结数量存在显著差异。
J Urol. 2012 Feb;187(2):446-50. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.029. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
10
Prospectively packaged lymph node dissections with radical cystectomy: evaluation of node count variability and node mapping.根治性膀胱切除术的前瞻性包装淋巴结清扫术:淋巴结计数变异性和淋巴结图谱评估
J Urol. 2004 Oct;172(4 Pt 1):1286-90. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000137817.56888.d1.

引用本文的文献

1
Progress of fluorescence imaging in lymph node dissection surgery for prostate and bladder cancer.前列腺癌和膀胱癌淋巴结清扫手术中荧光成像的进展
Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 4;14:1395284. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1395284. eCollection 2024.
2
Adequate Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Radical Cystectomy in the Era of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.新辅助化疗时代根治性膀胱切除术中充分盆腔淋巴结清扫的荟萃分析与系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 10;15(16):4040. doi: 10.3390/cancers15164040.
3
Analysis of the surgical approach in prostate cancer staging: results from the surveillance, epidemiology and end results program.
前列腺癌分期手术入路分析:监测、流行病学和最终结果计划的结果。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 19;13(1):9949. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37204-y.
4
Evaluation of cystoprostatectomy on patients with prostate cancer extending to bladder: a retrospective study from single center.评价膀胱前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌侵犯膀胱患者的效果:单中心回顾性研究。
BMC Urol. 2022 Jul 28;22(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01068-7.
5
Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Nephro-Ureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Review.上尿路尿路上皮癌根治性肾输尿管切除术时的淋巴结清扫:综述
Front Surg. 2022 Mar 24;9:852969. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.852969. eCollection 2022.
6
The role of extended lymph node dissection in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.扩大淋巴结清扫术在接受根治性膀胱切除术患者中的作用。
Turk J Urol. 2021 Feb;47(Supp. 1):S27-S32. doi: 10.5152/tud.2020.20376. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
7
The Role of Lymph Node Dissection in the Treatment of Bladder Cancer.淋巴结清扫术在膀胱癌治疗中的作用。
Front Surg. 2018 Oct 5;5:62. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00062. eCollection 2018.
8
Sentinel node evaluation in prostate cancer.前列腺癌中的前哨淋巴结评估。
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2018 Aug;35(5-6):471-485. doi: 10.1007/s10585-018-9936-4. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
9
Robotic radical cystectomy for the management of bladder cancer: Analysis of operative and pathological outcomes of eighteen patient.机器人根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌:18例患者的手术及病理结果分析
Turk J Urol. 2018 Jul;44(4):311-315. doi: 10.5152/tud.2018.19577.
10
Extent of lymphadenectomy in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy - a multi-institutional analysis.接受根治性膀胱切除术的膀胱癌患者的淋巴结清扫范围——一项多机构分析
Cent European J Urol. 2016;69(4):323-326. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2016.902. Epub 2016 Oct 19.