Suppr超能文献

18-30 月儿童行为检查表作为识别自闭症谱系障碍幼儿的工具:一项病例对照研究。

Child Behavior Check List 1½-5 as a tool to identify toddlers with autism spectrum disorders: a case-control study.

机构信息

Division of Child Neurology and Psychiatry, Stella Maris Scientific Institute, Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Apr;34(4):1179-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Feb 1.

Abstract

Tools to identify toddlers with autism in clinical settings have been recently developed. This study evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the Child Behavior Check List 1½-5 (CBCL 1½-5) in the detection of toddlers subsequently diagnosed with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), ages 18-36 months. The CBCL of 47 children with ASD were compared to the CBCL of 47 toddlers with Other Psychiatric Disorders (OPD) as well as the CBCL of 47 toddlers with Typical Development (TD) in a case control study. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and logistic regression with odds ratio (OR) analyses were performed. In order to establish the optimal threshold able to discriminate children with ASD from children with OPD and TD, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between the three groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that the Withdrawn and the Pervasive Developmental Problems (PDP) subscales can recognize toddlers subsequently identified as ASD from both children with TD (p<0.001) and OPD (p<0.001). ROC analyses showed very high sensitivity and specificity for the PDP (0.98 and 0.91) and Withdrawn (0.92 and 0.97) subscales when ASD was compared to TD. Sensitivity and specificity of Withdrawn (0.90 and 0.83) and PDP (0.85 and 0.83) remained high when comparing ASD versus OPD. In conclusion, the CBCL 1½-5 seemed to be able to identify toddlers subsequently diagnosed with ASD from children with TD and OPD. Its high sensitivity and specificity, coupled with its efficiency in terms of time and cost, suggest this broadband tool should be tested in a pilot screening survey of toddlers in the general population.

摘要

近年来,已经开发出用于在临床环境中识别自闭症儿童的工具。本研究评估了儿童行为检查表 1 ½-5(CBCL 1 ½-5)在检测 18-36 个月大随后被诊断为自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的幼儿中的敏感性和特异性。在病例对照研究中,将 47 名 ASD 儿童的 CBCL 与 47 名患有其他精神障碍(OPD)的幼儿以及 47 名具有典型发育(TD)的幼儿的 CBCL 进行了比较。进行了单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和优势比(OR)分析的逻辑回归分析。为了确定能够将 ASD 儿童与 OPD 和 TD 儿童区分开来的最佳阈值,进行了接收者操作特征(ROC)分析。单因素方差分析显示三组之间存在显著差异。逻辑回归分析表明,退缩和广泛性发育障碍(PDP)子量表可以识别出随后被诊断为 ASD 的幼儿,与 TD(p<0.001)和 OPD(p<0.001)的儿童。ROC 分析显示,与 TD 相比,PDP(0.98 和 0.91)和退缩(0.92 和 0.97)子量表的灵敏度和特异性非常高。当 ASD 与 OPD 相比时,退缩(0.90 和 0.83)和 PDP(0.85 和 0.83)的灵敏度和特异性仍然很高。总之,CBCL 1 ½-5 似乎能够识别出随后被诊断为 ASD 的幼儿与 TD 和 OPD 儿童。其高灵敏度和特异性,加上其在时间和成本方面的效率,表明应在一般人群中对幼儿进行试点筛查调查中测试此宽带工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验