• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The high-risk discectomy patient: prevention of reherniation in patients with large anular defects using an anular closure device.高危椎间盘切除术患者:使用环形封闭装置预防大环形缺损患者的再突出。
Eur Spine J. 2013 May;22(5):1030-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2656-1. Epub 2013 Feb 3.
2
Surgical Experience and Complications in 50 Patients Treated with an Anular Closure Device Following Lumbar Discectomy.腰椎间盘切除术后应用环形闭合装置治疗 50 例患者的手术经验和并发症。
Orthop Surg. 2019 Jun;11(3):431-437. doi: 10.1111/os.12495.
3
Answer to the letter to the editor of Dr. Yusuf Izci entitled "anular closure device: Is it necessary after discectomy?" concerning "the high-risk discectomy patient: prevention of reherniation in patients with large anular defects using an anular closure device" by G. J. Bouma, M. Barth, D. Ledic, M. Vilendecic (2013) Eur Spine J; 22(5):1030-1036.对优素福·伊兹奇博士致编辑的信的回复,信的标题为“纤维环闭合装置:椎间盘切除术后是否必要?”,内容涉及G. J. 布马、M. 巴特、D. Ledic、M. 维伦德西克所著的“高危椎间盘切除患者:使用纤维环闭合装置预防大纤维环缺损患者再突出”(2013年)《欧洲脊柱杂志》;22(5):1030 - 1036 。
Eur Spine J. 2014 Feb;23(2):485. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3041-9. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
4
Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study of anular repair in lumbar discectomy: two-year follow-up.前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照研究腰椎间盘切除术的环状修复:两年随访。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 15;38(14):1161-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828b2e2f.
5
Effect of anular closure on disk height maintenance and reoperated recurrent herniation following lumbar diskectomy: two-year data.腰椎间盘切除术后纤维环闭合对椎间盘高度维持及再手术复发性疝的影响:两年数据
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2015 May;76(3):211-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393930. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
6
Annular closure in lumbar microdiscectomy for prevention of reherniation: a randomized clinical trial.腰椎间盘切除术预防再突出的环扎闭合术:一项随机临床试验。
Spine J. 2018 Dec;18(12):2278-2287. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 3.
7
A prospective controlled study of limited versus subtotal posterior discectomy: short-term outcomes in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs and large posterior anular defect.有限性与次全后路椎间盘切除术的前瞻性对照研究:腰椎间盘突出症合并大型后纵韧带缺损患者的短期疗效
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Mar 15;31(6):653-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000203714.76250.68.
8
Three-year results from a randomized trial of lumbar discectomy with annulus fibrosus occlusion in patients at high risk for reherniation.在有再次突出高风险的患者中,行纤维环缝合术的腰椎间盘切除术的随机试验 3 年结果。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019 Jul;161(7):1389-1396. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-03948-8. Epub 2019 May 15.
9
Risk factors for early reherniation after lumbar discectomy with or without annular closure: results of a multicenter randomized controlled study.腰椎间盘切除术后早期再突出的危险因素:一项多中心随机对照研究的结果。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Jan;163(1):259-268. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04505-4. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
10
Two-year real-world results of lumbar discectomy with bone-anchored annular closure in patients at high risk of reherniation.骨锚定环形闭合腰椎间盘切除术治疗高复发风险患者的两年真实世界结果。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Nov;28(11):2572-2578. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06036-8. Epub 2019 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Annular Closure Device Reduces Symptomatic Reherniation Rates: Results of a Meta-analysis.环形闭合装置可降低有症状的再疝发生率:一项荟萃分析的结果。
HSS J. 2025 Feb;21(1):55-64. doi: 10.1177/15563316231215796. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
2
Current Therapeutic Strategies of Intervertebral Disc Regenerative Medicine.当前椎间盘再生医学的治疗策略。
Mol Diagn Ther. 2024 Nov;28(6):745-775. doi: 10.1007/s40291-024-00729-7. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
3
An comparison of three nucleus pulposus removal techniques for partial intervertebral disc replacement: An ultra-high resolution MRI study.三种用于部分椎间盘置换的髓核摘除技术的比较:一项超高分辨率磁共振成像研究。
JOR Spine. 2022 Dec 12;6(2):e1232. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1232. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Risk factors for early reherniation after lumbar discectomy with or without annular closure: results of a multicenter randomized controlled study.腰椎间盘切除术后早期再突出的危险因素:一项多中心随机对照研究的结果。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Jan;163(1):259-268. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04505-4. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
5
Intraoperative findings, complications, and short-term results after lumbar microdiscectomy with or without implantation of annular closure device.腰椎间盘切除术术中发现、并发症及短期疗效:使用或不使用环形闭合装置。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Feb;163(2):545-559. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04612-2. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
6
Needle-Guided Suture Technique for Lumbar Annular Fiber Closure in Microendoscopic Discectomy: A Technical Note and Case Series.经皮内窥镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎环状纤维闭合的针引导缝合技术:技术说明和病例系列。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Jan 26;26:e918619. doi: 10.12659/MSM.918619.
7
Efficacy of a Novel Annular Closure Device after Lumbar Discectomy in Korean Patients : A 24-Month Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.新型环形闭合装置在韩国患者腰椎间盘切除术后的疗效:一项随机对照试验的24个月随访
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2019 Nov;62(6):691-699. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2019.0071. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
8
The Disability Cascade: A Preventable Consequence of the Loss of Disc Height following Lumbar Microdiscectomy.残疾级联反应:腰椎显微椎间盘切除术后椎间盘高度丢失的可预防后果。
Cureus. 2019 Jul 18;11(7):e5169. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5169.
9
Prevention of lumbar reherniation by the intraoperative use of a radiofrequency bipolar device: A case-control study.术中使用射频双极设备预防腰椎再突出:一项病例对照研究。
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):94-99. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_47_19.
10
A Heterologous Fibrin Glue Enhances the Closure Effect of Surgical Suture on the Repair of Annulus Fibrous Defect in a Sheep Model.异种纤维蛋白胶增强手术缝线对绵羊模型纤维环缺损修复的闭合效果。
Curr Med Sci. 2019 Aug;39(4):597-603. doi: 10.1007/s11596-019-2079-2. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Repeat surgery after lumbar decompression for herniated disc: the quality implications of hospital and surgeon variation.腰椎减压术后再次手术治疗椎间盘突出症:医院和外科医生变异的质量影响。
Spine J. 2012 Feb;12(2):89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.11.010. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
2
Asymptomatic same-site recurrent disc herniation after lumbar discectomy: results of a prospective longitudinal study with 2-year serial imaging.腰椎间盘切除术后无症状同节段复发性椎间盘突出症:前瞻性纵向研究 2 年连续影像学结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 1;36(25):2147-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182054595.
3
Results and risk factors for recurrence following single-level tubular lumbar microdiscectomy.单节段管状腰椎显微切除术治疗后复发的结果和风险因素。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Jun;12(6):680-6. doi: 10.3171/2009.12.SPINE08843.
4
Higher risk of dural tears and recurrent herniation with lumbar micro-endoscopic discectomy.腰椎微创手术治疗椎间盘突出症并发硬脊膜撕裂和复发疝的风险更高。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Mar;19(3):443-50. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1290-4. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
5
Long-term back pain after a single-level discectomy for radiculopathy: incidence and health care cost analysis.单节段减压术后神经根病长期背痛:发生率和医疗成本分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Feb;12(2):178-82. doi: 10.3171/2009.9.SPINE09410.
6
A prospective cohort study of close interval computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging after primary lumbar discectomy: factors associated with recurrent disc herniation and disc height loss.初次腰椎间盘切除术后短间隔计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像的前瞻性队列研究:与复发性椎间盘突出和椎间盘高度丢失相关的因素
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 1;34(19):2044-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b34a9a.
7
Recurrent lumbar disc herniation after single-level lumbar discectomy: incidence and health care cost analysis.单节段腰椎间盘切除术后复发性腰椎间盘突出症:发病率及医疗费用分析
Neurosurgery. 2009 Sep;65(3):574-8; discussion 578. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000350224.36213.F9.
8
Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for sciatica: a randomized controlled trial.管状椎间盘切除术与传统显微椎间盘切除术治疗坐骨神经痛的随机对照试验
JAMA. 2009 Jul 8;302(2):149-58. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.972.
9
Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal.初次腰椎间盘切除术后复发性椎间盘突出症与长期背痛:有限与积极椎间盘切除术的疗效综述
Neurosurgery. 2009 Feb;64(2):338-44; discussion 344-5. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000337574.58662.E2.
10
Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).腰椎间盘突出症的手术治疗与非手术治疗:脊柱患者预后研究试验(SPORT)的四年结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Dec 1;33(25):2789-800. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ed8f4.

高危椎间盘切除术患者:使用环形封闭装置预防大环形缺损患者的再突出。

The high-risk discectomy patient: prevention of reherniation in patients with large anular defects using an anular closure device.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Academic Medical Center, St. Lucas-Andreas Ziekenhuis, Jan Tooropstaat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2013 May;22(5):1030-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2656-1. Epub 2013 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-013-2656-1
PMID:23377540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3657060/
Abstract

PURPOSE

With lumbar discectomy for disc herniation, surgeons must choose between limited nucleus removal associated with higher reherniation risk or more aggressive nucleus removal associated with increased back pain and disc degeneration. This trade-off is particularly challenging in patients with large anular defects, which carry the highest risk of reherniation. We examined the effect of an anular closure device on reherniation and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Seventy-five primary discectomy patients had a limited discectomy followed by implantation of an anular closure device and were followed-up to 2 years. Anular defect size and volume of removed nucleus was recorded at surgery. Reherniations were reported, pain and function were monitored throughout, and imaging was performed at annual visits.

RESULTS

The overall symptomatic reherniation rate was 1.4%, and the asymptomatic reherniation rate was 1.5% at 12 months and 5.1% at 24 months. Both rates compare favorably with literature reports which include symptomatic rates ranging between 2 and 18% (up to 27% for patients with large anular defects) and an asymptomatic rate of 13%.

CONCLUSIONS

The low reherniation rate in patients at high-risk of reherniation based on anular defect size, despite discectomy being only limited, suggests that an anular closure device may reduce reherniation risk. Clinical outcomes for pain and function at 1 and 2 years post-operatively compared favorably with literature reports. Further study in a randomized controlled trial is required to confirm these results.

摘要

目的

对于椎间盘突出症的腰椎间盘切除术,外科医生必须在与较高复发风险相关的有限核切除与与增加的背痛和椎间盘退变相关的更激进的核切除之间做出选择。在具有较大环状缺陷的患者中,这种权衡尤其具有挑战性,因为它们具有最高的复发风险。我们研究了环状闭合装置对复发和临床结果的影响。

方法

75 例原发性椎间盘切除术患者进行了有限的椎间盘切除术,然后植入环状闭合装置,并随访至 2 年。在手术中记录了环状缺陷的大小和切除的核体积。报告了复发情况,在整个过程中监测了疼痛和功能,并在每年的就诊时进行了影像学检查。

结果

总的症状性复发率为 1.4%,12 个月时无症状性复发率为 1.5%,24 个月时无症状性复发率为 5.1%。这两个比率与文献报告中的比率相比都有利,文献报告中的比率包括症状性复发率在 2%至 18%之间(对于具有较大环状缺陷的患者,最高可达 27%),无症状性复发率为 13%。

结论

尽管椎间盘切除术仅为有限切除,但基于环状缺陷大小,在具有高复发风险的患者中复发率较低,这表明环状闭合装置可能降低复发风险。术后 1 年和 2 年的疼痛和功能临床结果与文献报告相比有利。需要进一步的随机对照试验来证实这些结果。