• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留神经的间质内全子宫切除术的优势。

Advantages of nerve-sparing intrastromal total abdominal hysterectomy.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

Int J Womens Health. 2013;5:37-42. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S39631. Epub 2013 Jan 22.

DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S39631
PMID:23378786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3556916/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the prospective study was to evaluate the effect of the nerve-sparing intrastromal abdominal hysterectomy bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (ISTAH-BSO) on intraoperative, and postoperative complications namely blood loss and length of hospital stay.

METHODS

Forty female patients were allocated by a block randomization method into a study group and a control group. The study group consisted of 20 patients who underwent ISTAH-BSO over a 2-year period. The control group included 20 patients who underwent conventional hysterectomy by the same surgeon during the same time frame. Both groups were followed for outcomes of interest, which included length of hospital stay, blood loss, and surgical complications. The participants in both groups were as similar as possible with respect to all known or unknown factors that might affect the study outcome.

RESULTS

Postoperative hemoglobin levels were higher in the study group (blood loss 1.0 g/dL versus 1.4 g/dL in control group). Average hospital stay was significantly shorter in the study group (2.7 days versus 3.15 days in the control group, P = 0.028). No significant complications such as urinary fistula, vaginal vault prolapse, blood transfusion, or postoperative infections were identified in the study group.

CONCLUSION

The nerve-sparing ISTAH-BSO procedure described in this study has the potential to reduce length of hospital stay after abdominal hysterectomy by reducing blood loss and postoperative complications. Follow-up observations suggest that urinary function and sexual satisfaction are also preserved. Since this research, 175 cases have been performed, with an average of 5 years of follow-up. The outcomes of these cases have been reported as similar.

摘要

背景

本前瞻性研究旨在评估保留神经的子宫间质内切除术双侧输卵管卵巢切除术(ISTAH-BSO)对术中及术后并发症(即出血量和住院时间)的影响。

方法

40 名女性患者采用区组随机化方法分为研究组和对照组。研究组 20 例患者在 2 年内接受 ISTAH-BSO。对照组 20 例患者由同一位外科医生在同一时期接受传统子宫切除术。两组均随访感兴趣的结局,包括住院时间、出血量和手术并发症。两组患者在可能影响研究结果的所有已知或未知因素方面尽可能相似。

结果

研究组术后血红蛋白水平较高(出血量为 1.0 g/dL,而对照组为 1.4 g/dL)。研究组平均住院时间明显缩短(2.7 天 vs. 对照组 3.15 天,P = 0.028)。研究组未发现明显并发症,如尿瘘、阴道穹窿脱垂、输血或术后感染。

结论

本研究中描述的保留神经的 ISTAH-BSO 术式有可能通过减少出血量和术后并发症来缩短腹部子宫切除术后的住院时间。随访观察表明,还保留了尿功能和性功能满意度。自这项研究以来,已经进行了 175 例手术,平均随访 5 年。这些病例的结果报告相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ca1/3556916/2543bbe55ebe/ijwh-5-037f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ca1/3556916/3a56d7a65d95/ijwh-5-037f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ca1/3556916/2543bbe55ebe/ijwh-5-037f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ca1/3556916/3a56d7a65d95/ijwh-5-037f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ca1/3556916/2543bbe55ebe/ijwh-5-037f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Advantages of nerve-sparing intrastromal total abdominal hysterectomy.保留神经的间质内全子宫切除术的优势。
Int J Womens Health. 2013;5:37-42. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S39631. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
2
[Feasibility of unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and evaluation of the post-surgery recovery of the bladder and rectal function].[宫颈癌患者行单侧或双侧保留神经根治性子宫切除术的可行性及术后膀胱和直肠功能恢复情况评估]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2011 Jan;33(1):53-7.
3
Abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: a feasibility study for further evaluation in randomized trials.腹式、腹腔镜及阴道子宫切除术加双侧输卵管卵巢切除术:一项在随机试验中进行进一步评估的可行性研究。
Surg Endosc. 1999 Feb;13(2):148-50. doi: 10.1007/s004649900926.
4
Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy--implications for gynecologic practice in the United Kingdom.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术加双侧卵巢切除术与经腹全子宫切除术加双侧输卵管卵巢切除术——对英国妇科实践的启示
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994 Feb;1(2):111-5. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80772-8.
5
A randomised prospective study of laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy each with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.一项关于腹腔镜阴道子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术加双侧输卵管卵巢切除术的随机前瞻性研究。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Dec;101(12):1068-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13583.x.
6
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in endometrial carcinoma: prospective cohort study.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)与全子宫切除术(TAH)治疗子宫内膜癌的前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 May;20(4):570-5. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181d8b105.
7
Abdominal hysterectomy versus transvaginal morcellation for the removal of enlarged uteri.腹式子宫切除术与经阴道粉碎术治疗子宫增大的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;171(2):309-13; discussion 313-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70028-1.
8
Total laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer compared with laparotomy.子宫内膜癌全腹腔镜改良根治性子宫切除术加淋巴结清扫术与开腹手术的比较
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Feb;40(2):570-5. doi: 10.1111/jog.12194. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
Postoperative complications of epidural analgesia at hysterectomy for gynecologic malignancies: an analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.妇科恶性肿瘤子宫切除术患者硬膜外镇痛的术后并发症:国家手术质量改进计划分析。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Aug;30(8):1203-1209. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001339. Epub 2020 May 25.
10
Vaginal Colpectomy in Transgender Men: A Retrospective Cohort Study on Surgical Procedure and Outcomes. transgender 男性的阴道切除术:一项关于手术程序和结果的回顾性队列研究。
J Sex Med. 2019 Jun;16(6):924-933. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.03.263. Epub 2019 Apr 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches.全国范围使用腹腔镜子宫切除术与经腹和经阴道途径的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1041-1048. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b9d222.
2
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 448: Menstrual manipulation for adolescents with disabilities.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 448 号:残疾青少年的月经管理。
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1428-1431. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c6f922.
3
Issues in outcomes research: an overview of randomization techniques for clinical trials.
结果研究中的问题:临床试验随机化技术概述
J Athl Train. 2008 Apr-Jun;43(2):215-21. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.215.
4
Hysterectomy for benign disease.良性疾病的子宫切除术。
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):753-67. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318165f18c.
5
Laser therapy and serial amnioreduction as treatment for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a metaanalysis and review of literature.激光治疗和系列羊水减量术治疗双胎输血综合征:一项荟萃分析及文献综述
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Feb;198(2):147-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.09.043.
6
Risk factors for urinary incontinence among middle-aged women.中年女性尿失禁的危险因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;194(2):339-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.051.
7
Outcomes after total versus subtotal abdominal hysterectomy.全腹子宫切除术与次全腹子宫切除术的术后结果。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 24;347(17):1318-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013336.
8
ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and treatment of cervical carcinomas. Number 35, May 2002. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.美国妇产科医师学会实践公告。宫颈癌的诊断与治疗。第35号,2002年5月。美国妇产科医师学会。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002 Jul;78(1):79-91. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(02)90092-5.
9
Hysterectomy and urinary incontinence: a systematic review.子宫切除术与尿失禁:一项系统综述
Lancet. 2000 Aug 12;356(9229):535-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02577-0.
10
Factors affecting prophylactic oophorectomy in postmenopausal women.影响绝经后妇女预防性卵巢切除术的因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Dec;94(6):962-8. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00452-4.