Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Anaesthesia. 2013 Mar;68(3):260-6. doi: 10.1111/anae.12107. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
Persistent mechanical irritation of the nerve root sets up a series of events mediating sensitisation of the dorsal roots and dorsal horns in the spinal cord. Current evidence supports the role of magnesium in blocking central sensitisation through its effect on N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors. We studied the role of sequential intravenous and oral magnesium infusion in patients with chronic low back pain with a neuropathic component. We recruited a cohort of 80 patients with chronic low back pain with a Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Signs and Symptoms pain scale score ≥ 12, who were receiving a physical therapy programme. All patients were treated with anticonvulsants, antidepressants and simple analgesics; in addition 40 patients received placebo for 6 weeks (control group), while the other 40 patients received an intravenous magnesium infusion for 2 weeks followed by oral magnesium capsules for another 4 weeks (magnesium group). Patients were asked to rate their pain using a numerical rating scale. Lumbar spine range of motion was also determined using a long-arm goniometer. In the magnesium group, the patients' numerical rating scales revealed a significant reduction in pain intensity. The mean (SD) pre-treatment value was 7.5 (2.2) compared with 4.7 (1.8) at 6 months (p = 0.034). The reduction in pain intensity was accompanied by significant improvement in lumbar spine range of motion during the follow-up period. The mean (SD) values of flexion, extension and lateral flexion movements before treatment and at 6-month follow up were 22.2 (8.4) vs 34.7 (11.5) (p = 0.018), 11.8 (3.4) vs 16.9 (3.5) (p = 0.039), 11.4 (3.6) vs 17.2 (4.4) (p = 0.035), respectively. Our findings show that a 2-week intravenous magnesium infusion followed by 4 weeks of oral magnesium supplementation can reduce pain intensity and improve lumbar spine mobility during a 6-month period in patients with refractory chronic low back pain with a neuropathic component.
神经根的持续机械刺激会引发一系列事件,介导脊髓背根和背角的敏化。目前的证据支持镁通过其对 N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体的作用来阻断中枢敏化。我们研究了静脉内和口服镁序贯输注在伴有神经病理性成分的慢性腰痛患者中的作用。我们招募了 80 名慢性腰痛患者,他们的利兹评估神经病理性症状和体征疼痛量表评分≥12 分,正在接受物理治疗方案。所有患者均接受抗惊厥药、抗抑郁药和简单镇痛药治疗;此外,40 名患者接受 6 周安慰剂(对照组),而另 40 名患者接受 2 周静脉内镁输注,然后再接受 4 周口服镁胶囊(镁组)。患者使用数字评分量表来评估他们的疼痛。腰椎活动范围也使用长臂量角器来确定。在镁组中,患者的数字评分量表显示疼痛强度显著降低。治疗前的平均(SD)值为 7.5(2.2),而 6 个月时为 4.7(1.8)(p=0.034)。疼痛强度的降低伴随着随访期间腰椎活动范围的显著改善。治疗前和 6 个月随访时的屈曲、伸展和侧屈运动的平均(SD)值分别为 22.2(8.4)与 34.7(11.5)(p=0.018)、11.8(3.4)与 16.9(3.5)(p=0.039)、11.4(3.6)与 17.2(4.4)(p=0.035)。我们的研究结果表明,在伴有神经病理性成分的难治性慢性腰痛患者中,静脉内镁输注 2 周,随后口服镁补充 4 周,可在 6 个月内降低疼痛强度并改善腰椎活动度。