Li S G, Spaeth G L, Scimeca H A, Schatz N J, Savino P J
Glaucoma Service, Wills Eye Hospital-Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19130.
Ophthalmology. 1979 Jul;86(7):1302-16. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(79)35397-0.
This is a study of 59 patients, 42 with glaucoma and 17 with neurological disease, to compare the Octopus automated perimeter with the conventional Goldmann and Tubinger perimeters for detection and assessment of visual field defects. We believe the Octopus automated perimeter is an excellent method for screening patients suspected of glaucoma and can be expected to identify over 90% of the patients actually having visual field loss due to glaucoma. In patients with neurological disease, the Goldmann perimeter was superior to either the Octopus or Tubinger perimeters in providing clinically useful information.
这是一项针对59名患者的研究，其中42名患有青光眼，17名患有神经疾病，旨在比较章鱼自动视野计与传统的戈德曼视野计和图宾根视野计在检测和评估视野缺损方面的效果。我们认为章鱼自动视野计是筛查疑似青光眼患者的一种出色方法，预计能够识别出超过90%实际因青光眼而出现视野丧失的患者。在患有神经疾病的患者中，戈德曼视野计在提供临床有用信息方面优于章鱼视野计或图宾根视野计。
