• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适应和分析心理计量特征的照顾者风险筛查:一种用于检测家庭照顾者负担风险的工具。

Adaptation and analysis of psychometric features of the Caregiver Risk Screen: a tool for detecting the risk of burden in family caregivers.

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.

出版信息

Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 May;25(5):755-64. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212002426. Epub 2013 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1017/S1041610212002426
PMID:23388522
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are a limited number of scales available in the Spanish language that can be used to detect burden among individuals who care for a dependent family member. The purpose of this work was to adapt and validate the Caregiver Risk Screen (CRS) scale developed by Guberman et al. (2001) (Guberman, N., Keefe, J., Fancey, P., Nahmiash, D. and Barylak, L. (2001). Development of Screening and Assessment Tools for Family Caregivers: Final Report. Montreal, Canada: Health Transition Fund).

METHODS

The sample was made up of 302 informal caregivers of dependent family members (average age 57.3 years, and 78.9% were women). Scale structure was subjected to a confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent and convergent validity were assessed by correlation with validated questionnaires for measuring burden (Zarit Burden Inventory (ZBI)) and psychological health (SCL-90-R).

RESULTS

The results show a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86), suitable fit of the one-dimensional model tested via confirmatory factor analysis (GFI = 0.91; CFI = 0.91; RMSEA = 0.097), and appropriate convergent validity with similar constructs (r = 0.77 with ZBI; and r-values between 0.45 and 0.63 with SCL-90-R dimensions).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings are promising in terms of their adaptation of the CRS to Spanish, and the results enable us to draw the conclusion that the CRS is a suitable tool for assessing and detecting strain in family caregivers. Nevertheless, new research is required that explores all the psychometric features on the scale.

摘要

背景

西班牙语中可用的量表数量有限,这些量表可用于检测照顾依赖家庭成员的个体的负担。本研究旨在改编和验证 Guberman 等人(2001 年)开发的照顾者风险筛查(CRS)量表(Guberman,N.,Keefe,J.,Fancey,P.,Nahmiash,D.和 Barylak,L.(2001)。为家庭照顾者开发筛选和评估工具:最终报告。加拿大蒙特利尔:健康过渡基金)。

方法

该样本由 302 名依赖家庭成员的非正式照顾者组成(平均年龄 57.3 岁,78.9%为女性)。量表结构进行了验证性因素分析。通过与验证性问卷(Zarit 负担量表(ZBI))和心理健康(SCL-90-R)进行相关性评估,评估同时性和收敛效度。

结果

结果显示,内部一致性水平较高(Cronbach's alpha = 0.86),通过验证性因素分析测试的一维模型拟合良好(GFI = 0.91;CFI = 0.91;RMSEA = 0.097),与相似结构具有适当的收敛效度(与 ZBI 的 r = 0.77;与 SCL-90-R 维度的 r 值在 0.45 和 0.63 之间)。

结论

这些发现表明,将 CRS 改编为西班牙语是有希望的,并且结果使我们得出结论,CRS 是评估和检测家庭照顾者压力的合适工具。然而,需要进一步研究该量表的所有心理计量学特征。

相似文献

1
Adaptation and analysis of psychometric features of the Caregiver Risk Screen: a tool for detecting the risk of burden in family caregivers.适应和分析心理计量特征的照顾者风险筛查:一种用于检测家庭照顾者负担风险的工具。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 May;25(5):755-64. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212002426. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
2
Psychometric properties of the Leisure Time Satisfaction Scale in family caregivers.家庭照顾者闲暇时间满意度量表的心理测量学特性
Psicothema. 2016 May;28(2):207-13. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2015.278.
3
Assessment of the consequences of caregiving in psychosis: a psychometric comparison of the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) and the Involvement Evaluation Questionnaire (IEQ).精神病护理后果评估:Zarit负担访谈量表(ZBI)与参与度评估问卷(IEQ)的心理测量学比较
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 5;15(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0626-8.
4
Confirmatory factor analysis of a brief version of the Zarit Burden Interview in Black and White dementia caregivers.对 Zarit 负担访谈简短版在黑人和白人痴呆症照顾者中的验证性因子分析。
Gerontologist. 2011 Aug;51(4):453-62. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr011. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
5
Psychometric properties of the Hebrew version of the Zarit Caregiver Burden Scale short version.《Zarit 照顾者负担量表短版希伯来文版的心理测量学特性》。
Aging Ment Health. 2012;16(2):254-63. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.596807. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
6
Validation of two short versions of the Zarit Burden Interview in the palliative care setting: a questionnaire to assess the burden of informal caregivers.验证 Zarit 负担访谈的两个简短版本在姑息治疗环境中的有效性:评估非正式照顾者负担的问卷。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Nov;28(11):5185-5193. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05288-w. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
7
Trajectories of Multidimensional Caregiver Burden in Chinese Informal Caregivers for Dementia: Evidence from Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Zarit Burden Interview.痴呆症中国非正规照护者多维照护者负担的轨迹:Zarit 负担访谈的探索性和验证性因子分析证据。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;59(4):1317-1325. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170172.
8
Validity and Utility of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Detecting Depression in Family Caregivers of Persons with Dementia.用于检测痴呆患者家庭成员中抑郁症状的流行病学研究中心抑郁量表的有效性和实用性。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2019;47(4-6):323-334. doi: 10.1159/000500940. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
9
A 3-Item Screening Scale for Caregiver Burden in Dementia Caregiving: Scale Development and Score Mapping to the 22-Item Zarit Burden Interview.用于痴呆症照护的 caregiver 负担的 3 项筛查量表:量表开发和与 22 项 Zarit 负担访谈的分数映射。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 May;20(5):629-633.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
10
Detecting Predeath Grief in Family Caregivers of Persons With Dementia: Validity and Utility of the Marwit-Meuser Caregiver Grief Inventory in a Multiethnic Asian Population.检测痴呆患者家庭成员的临终前悲伤:马维特-迈泽尔照顾者悲伤量表在多民族亚洲人群中的有效性和实用性。
Gerontologist. 2018 Mar 19;58(2):e150-e159. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx097.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of caregiver burden in Iranian family caregivers of cancer patients.伊朗癌症患者家庭照料者照料负担的预测因素
J Educ Health Promot. 2017 Oct 4;6:91. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_137_16. eCollection 2017.
2
Assessment of physical function and participation in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT/OMERACT recommendations.慢性疼痛临床试验中身体功能与参与情况的评估:IMMPACT/OMERACT建议
Pain. 2016 Sep;157(9):1836-1850. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000577.