• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国的疾病管理项目:一个根本性的错误。

Disease management programmes in Germany: a fundamental fault.

机构信息

Faculties of Medicine and Economics, Institute of Social Medicine and Health Economics, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2006 Dec;24 Suppl 2:55-7. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624002-00006.

DOI:10.2165/00019053-200624002-00006
PMID:23389488
Abstract

In 2001 Germany introduced disease management programmes (DMPs) in order to give sick funds an incentive to improve the treatment of the chronically ill. By 1 March 2005, a total of 3275 programmes had been approved, 2760 for diabetes, 390 for breast cancer and 125 for coronary heart disease, covering roughly 1 million patients. German DMPs show a major fault regarding financial incentives. Sick funds increase their transfers from the risk adjustment scheme when their clients enroll in DMPs. Since this money is a lump sum, sick funds do not necessarily foster treatment of the chronically ill. Similarly, reimbursement of physicians is also not well targeted to the needs of DMPs. Preliminary evidence points to poor performance of German DMPs.

摘要

2001 年,德国引入疾病管理计划(DMP),旨在激励医保基金改善慢性病患者的治疗。截至 2005 年 3 月 1 日,共有 3275 个计划获得批准,其中 2760 个用于糖尿病,390 个用于乳腺癌,125 个用于冠心病,覆盖了大约 100 万名患者。德国的 DMP 在经济激励方面存在重大缺陷。当客户参加 DMP 时,医保基金会增加从风险调整计划中转出的资金。由于这笔钱是一笔总额,医保基金不一定会促进慢性病患者的治疗。同样,对医生的报销也没有很好地针对 DMP 的需求。初步证据表明德国 DMP 的表现不佳。

相似文献

1
Disease management programmes in Germany: a fundamental fault.德国的疾病管理项目:一个根本性的错误。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006 Dec;24 Suppl 2:55-7. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624002-00006.
2
[Modern concepts of medical care--what has been achieved by the implementation of disease management programs?].[现代医疗观念——疾病管理项目的实施取得了哪些成果?]
Z Kardiol. 2005;94 Suppl 4:IV/7-11. doi: 10.1007/s00392-005-1403-y.
3
[Lump sum payment system in psychiatry and psychosomatics: concomitant research - quo vadis?].[精神病学与身心医学中的一次性付费系统:伴随研究——何去何从?]
Nervenarzt. 2013 Jul;84(7):864-8. doi: 10.1007/s00115-013-3795-7.
4
[Factors Influencing Participation in Financial Incentive Programmes of Health Insurance Funds. Results of the Study 'German Health Update'].[影响医疗保险基金参与经济激励计划的因素。“德国健康更新”研究结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2015 Nov;77(11):861-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396808. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
5
[Relevance of medical rehabilitation in disease management programmes].[医学康复在疾病管理项目中的相关性]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2003 Oct;42(5):284-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-42856.
6
Can pay-for-performance improve quality and reduce health disparities?绩效薪酬能否提高质量并减少健康差距?
PLoS Med. 2007 Jun;4(6):e216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040216.
7
Explaining differences in stakeholder take up of disease management programmes: A comparative analysis of policy implementation in Austria and Germany.解释利益相关者对疾病管理项目接受程度的差异:奥地利和德国政策实施的比较分析。
Health Policy. 2016 Mar;120(3):281-92. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
8
Disease management programmes for patients with coronary heart disease--an empirical study of German programmes.冠心病患者的疾病管理项目——对德国项目的实证研究
Health Policy. 2008 Dec;88(2-3):176-85. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
9
[General practitioners' opinion and attitude towards DMPs and the change in practice routines to implement the DMP "diabetes mellitus type 2"].[全科医生对糖尿病管理计划的看法和态度以及实施“2型糖尿病”糖尿病管理计划的实践流程变化]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(6):427-33. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.06.026. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
10
[General practitioners' perspectives on the perceived effectiveness of the disease management programs for type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease: Results of a focus group study].[全科医生对2型糖尿病和冠心病疾病管理项目感知效果的看法:焦点小组研究结果]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024 Apr;185:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.12.003. Epub 2024 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Transatlantic convergence with respect to the fourth hurdle?是否在跨越第四道难关方面趋于大西洋两岸统一?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006 Dec;24 Suppl 2:87-94. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624002-00009.
2
The disease management program for type 2 diabetes in Germany enhances process quality of diabetes care - a follow-up survey of patient's experiences.德国 2 型糖尿病疾病管理项目提高了糖尿病护理的流程质量——基于患者体验的随访调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Mar 3;10:55. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-55.

本文引用的文献

1
MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.MRC/BHF糖尿病患者使用辛伐他汀降低胆固醇的心脏保护研究:一项随机安慰剂对照试验(涉及5963名糖尿病患者)
Lancet. 2003 Jun 14;361(9374):2005-16. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13636-7.
2
Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group.2型糖尿病患者严格血压控制与大血管及微血管并发症风险:英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS 38)。英国前瞻性糖尿病研究小组
BMJ. 1998 Sep 12;317(7160):703-13.
3
Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction.
2型糖尿病患者以及有和没有既往心肌梗死的非糖尿病患者的冠心病死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 23;339(4):229-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199807233390404.
4
Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 2, Short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context.血压、中风与冠心病。第2部分,血压的短期降低:在流行病学背景下随机药物试验综述
Lancet. 1990 Apr 7;335(8693):827-38. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90944-z.