• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

溪流水文学限制了狼群重新引入后河岸生态系统的恢复。

Stream hydrology limits recovery of riparian ecosystems after wolf reintroduction.

机构信息

Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1499, USA.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Feb 6;280(1756):20122977. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2977. Print 2013 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2012.2977
PMID:23390108
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3574379/
Abstract

Efforts to restore ecosystems often focus on reintroducing apex predators to re-establish coevolved relationships among predators, herbivores and plants. The preponderance of evidence for indirect effects of predators on terrestrial plant communities comes from ecosystems where predators have been removed. Far less is known about the consequences of their restoration. The effects of removal and restoration are unlikely to be symmetrical because removing predators can create feedbacks that reinforce the effects of predator loss. Observational studies have suggested that the reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park initiated dramatic restoration of riparian ecosystems by releasing willows from excessive browsing by elk. Here, we present results from a decade-long experiment in Yellowstone showing that moderating browsing alone was not sufficient to restore riparian zones along small streams. Instead, restoration of willow communities depended on removing browsing and restoring hydrological conditions that prevailed before the removal of wolves. The 70-year absence of predators from the ecosystem changed the disturbance regime in a way that was not reversed by predator reintroduction. We conclude that predator restoration may not quickly repair effects of predator removal in ecosystems.

摘要

人们常常致力于恢复生态系统,重新引入顶级捕食者,以重新建立捕食者、食草动物和植物之间共同进化的关系。大量证据表明,捕食者对陆地植物群落的间接影响来自于已去除捕食者的生态系统。而关于它们恢复的后果,我们知之甚少。移除和恢复的效果不太可能是对称的,因为移除捕食者会产生反馈,从而强化捕食者损失的影响。观察性研究表明,黄石国家公园狼群的重新引入通过释放柳树免受麋鹿过度啃食,引发了河岸生态系统的显著恢复。在这里,我们展示了黄石公园长达十年的实验结果,表明仅调节啃食本身不足以恢复小溪沿岸的河岸带。相反,柳树群落的恢复取决于去除啃食行为,并恢复在狼群移除之前占主导地位的水文学条件。七十年来,该生态系统中缺乏捕食者,以一种不能通过捕食者再引入来逆转的方式改变了干扰机制。我们的结论是,捕食者的恢复可能不会迅速修复捕食者移除对生态系统的影响。

相似文献

1
Stream hydrology limits recovery of riparian ecosystems after wolf reintroduction.溪流水文学限制了狼群重新引入后河岸生态系统的恢复。
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Feb 6;280(1756):20122977. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2977. Print 2013 Apr 7.
2
Hydrologic regime and herbivory stabilize an alternative state in Yellowstone National Park.水文状况和食草作用稳定了黄石国家公园的一种替代状态。
Ecol Appl. 2007 Sep;17(6):1572-87. doi: 10.1890/06-2042.1.
3
Willow on Yellowstone's northern range: evidence for a trophic cascade?黄石公园北部地区的柳树:营养级联效应的证据?
Ecol Appl. 2007 Sep;17(6):1563-71. doi: 10.1890/06-1254.1.
4
Water tables constrain height recovery of willow on Yellowstone's northern range.地下水位限制了黄石国家公园北部地区柳树的高度恢复。
Ecol Appl. 2008 Jan;18(1):80-92. doi: 10.1890/07-0212.1.
5
Elk browsing increases aboveground growth of water-stressed willows by modifying plant architecture.驼鹿啃食通过改变植物结构增加了水分胁迫柳树的地上生长。
Oecologia. 2007 Dec;154(3):467-78. doi: 10.1007/s00442-007-0854-4. Epub 2007 Oct 13.
6
Trophic cascades from wolves to grizzly bears in Yellowstone.黄石公园内狼对灰熊的营养级联效应。
J Anim Ecol. 2014 Jan;83(1):223-33. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12123. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
7
Are wolves saving Yellowstone's aspen? A landscape-level test of a behaviorally mediated trophic cascade.狼是否拯救了黄石公园的山杨?行为介导的营养级联的景观水平测试。
Ecology. 2010 Sep;91(9):2742-55. doi: 10.1890/09-1949.1.
8
Investigating tritrophic interactions using bioenergetic demographic models.利用生物能量动态学模型研究三营养层相互作用。
Ecology. 2024 Jan;105(1):e4197. doi: 10.1002/ecy.4197. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
9
Recovery of a marine keystone predator transforms terrestrial predator-prey dynamics.海洋关键捕食者的恢复改变了陆地捕食者-猎物的动态。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jan 31;120(5):e2209037120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2209037120. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
10
Prey risk allocation in a grazing ecosystem.放牧生态系统中的猎物风险分配
Ecol Appl. 2006 Feb;16(1):285-98. doi: 10.1890/04-0623.

引用本文的文献

1
Sampling bias exaggerates a textbook example of a trophic cascade.抽样偏差夸大了一个营养级联的典型教科案例。
Ecol Lett. 2022 Jan;25(1):177-188. doi: 10.1111/ele.13915. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
2
Beaver: Nature's ecosystem engineers.海狸:大自然的生态系统工程师。
WIREs Water. 2021 Jan-Feb;8(1):e1494. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1494. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
3
Outsized effect of predation: Wolves alter wetland creation and recolonization by killing ecosystem engineers.捕食的巨大影响:狼通过捕杀生态系统工程师来改变湿地的形成和重新定殖。
Sci Adv. 2020 Nov 13;6(46). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc5439. Print 2020 Nov.
4
Public perspectives and media reporting of wolf reintroduction in Colorado.科罗拉多州狼重新引入的公众观点与媒体报道
PeerJ. 2020 May 7;8:e9074. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9074. eCollection 2020.
5
Linking beaver dam affected flow dynamics to upstream passage of Arctic grayling.将海狸坝影响的水流动力学与北极茴鱼的上游洄游联系起来。
Ecol Evol. 2018 Dec 4;8(24):12905-12917. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4728. eCollection 2018 Dec.
6
Credit of ecological interactions: A new conceptual framework to support conservation in a defaunated world.生态相互作用的功劳:一个支持在动物灭绝的世界中进行保护的新概念框架。
Ecol Evol. 2017 Feb 18;7(6):1892-1897. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2746. eCollection 2017 Mar.
7
A systematic review of ecological attributes that confer resilience to climate change in environmental restoration.对环境恢复中赋予气候变化适应力的生态属性的系统综述。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 16;12(3):e0173812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173812. eCollection 2017.
8
Ecosystem context and historical contingency in apex predator recoveries.生态系统背景和历史偶然性对顶级捕食者恢复的影响。
Sci Adv. 2016 May 27;2(5):e1501769. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501769. eCollection 2016 May.
9
Rethinking predators: Legend of the wolf.重新审视食肉动物:狼的传奇
Nature. 2014 Mar 13;507(7491):158-60. doi: 10.1038/507158a.
10
Focusing ecological research for conservation.聚焦于具有保护价值的生态学研究。
Ambio. 2013 Nov;42(7):805-15. doi: 10.1007/s13280-013-0410-x. Epub 2013 Apr 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Trophic downgrading of planet Earth.地球的营养降级。
Science. 2011 Jul 15;333(6040):301-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1205106.
2
Are wolves saving Yellowstone's aspen? A landscape-level test of a behaviorally mediated trophic cascade.狼是否拯救了黄石公园的山杨?行为介导的营养级联的景观水平测试。
Ecology. 2010 Sep;91(9):2742-55. doi: 10.1890/09-1949.1.
3
Wolf presence and increased willow consumption by Yellowstone elk: implications for trophic cascades.黄石国家公园的狼的存在与麋鹿对柳树的啃食增加:对营养级联效应的影响
Ecology. 2009 Sep;90(9):2454-66. doi: 10.1890/08-2017.1.
4
Water tables constrain height recovery of willow on Yellowstone's northern range.地下水位限制了黄石国家公园北部地区柳树的高度恢复。
Ecol Appl. 2008 Jan;18(1):80-92. doi: 10.1890/07-0212.1.
5
Leading indicators of trophic cascades.营养级联的主要指标。
Ecol Lett. 2008 Feb;11(2):128-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01131.x. Epub 2007 Nov 15.
6
Elk browsing increases aboveground growth of water-stressed willows by modifying plant architecture.驼鹿啃食通过改变植物结构增加了水分胁迫柳树的地上生长。
Oecologia. 2007 Dec;154(3):467-78. doi: 10.1007/s00442-007-0854-4. Epub 2007 Oct 13.
7
Hydrologic regime and herbivory stabilize an alternative state in Yellowstone National Park.水文状况和食草作用稳定了黄石国家公园的一种替代状态。
Ecol Appl. 2007 Sep;17(6):1572-87. doi: 10.1890/06-2042.1.
8
Willow on Yellowstone's northern range: evidence for a trophic cascade?黄石公园北部地区的柳树:营养级联效应的证据?
Ecol Appl. 2007 Sep;17(6):1563-71. doi: 10.1890/06-1254.1.
9
Using GIS to generate spatially balanced random survey designs for natural resource applications.利用地理信息系统为自然资源应用生成空间平衡的随机调查设计。
Environ Manage. 2007 Jul;40(1):134-46. doi: 10.1007/s00267-005-0199-x. Epub 2007 May 22.
10
Cascading effects of the loss of apex predatory sharks from a coastal ocean.沿海海洋顶级掠食性鲨鱼消失的级联效应。
Science. 2007 Mar 30;315(5820):1846-50. doi: 10.1126/science.1138657.