O'Rourke Boyle Marjorie
95 Normandy Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4L 3K4.
Med Hist. 2013 Jan;57(1):6-27. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2012.78.
This article continues the analyses in Medical History 52 (2008), 73-90, 365-86 of William Harvey's self-understanding as the philosopher and discoverer of the blood's circulation. Harvey brilliantly and subversively assumed the persona of the mythological Hercules to embody his own anatomical labour in De motu cordis et sanguinis (1628). He reprised the role in self-defence against accusations in the College of Physicians, London, of his breach of faith with medical tradition. Harvey sought to usurp the medical epithet 'a second Hercules' by reforming humanist dependence on ancient texts as authoritative medicine. A knowledge of the theory and practice of Renaissance humanism discloses his identification with the Herculean labour of cleansing the Augean stable. He employed anatomical demonstration against Galen's porous cardiac septum, which admitted blood across the ventricles. Harvey's oath mehercule swore against Galen's Dia to assert the necessity of opening an alternate route for the blood flow. His Herculean labour was to dam the cardiac septum and divert the blood flow into a continuous channel through the arteries and veins. His circulation of the blood also imitated Hercules' successful dependence on the force of the water flow to flush the Augean stable. Harvey's copia did not denote a quantitative amount but a powerful supply. Harvey aspired to be, like Hercules, immortal, a term which the College belatedly acknowledged. This cultural analysis exposes Harvey's professional issues and personal ambitions, so to promote a fuller understanding of his historic role in medical discovery.
本文延续了《医学史》第52卷(2008年)第73 - 90页、第365 - 386页中对威廉·哈维作为血液循环的哲学家和发现者的自我认知的分析。哈维在《心血运动论》(1628年)中巧妙且颠覆性地以神话中的赫拉克勒斯形象来体现他自己的解剖学工作。在伦敦医师学院因他违背医学传统而受到指责时,他再次扮演这个角色进行自我辩护。哈维试图通过改革人文主义对古代文本作为权威医学的依赖,来篡夺“第二个赫拉克勒斯”这一医学称号。对文艺复兴人文主义理论与实践的了解揭示了他与清理奥吉亚斯牛圈这项艰巨劳动的认同。他运用解剖演示来反驳盖伦关于心脏中隔多孔、允许血液在心室间流通的观点。哈维以“以赫拉克勒斯之名”起誓,反对盖伦的观点,以断言为血流开辟另一条途径的必要性。他艰巨的工作是封堵心脏中隔,使血流通过动脉和静脉流入一个连续的通道。他的血液循环理论还模仿了赫拉克勒斯成功地依靠水流的力量来冲洗奥吉亚斯牛圈。哈维所说的“丰富”并非指数量上的多少,而是指强大有力的供应。哈维渴望像赫拉克勒斯一样不朽,伦敦医师学院后来才承认了这一点。这种文化分析揭示了哈维的专业问题和个人抱负,从而促进对他在医学发现中的历史作用有更全面的理解。