Department of Psychology.
Dev Psychol. 2013 Nov;49(11):2082-94. doi: 10.1037/a0031745. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
The primary goal of this study was to examine whether effortful control (EC; effortful regulation), reactive undercontrol (IMP; e.g., impulsivity, speed of approach), and reactive overcontrol (NOV; inhibition to novelty) were 3 distinct constructs at 30 months (Time 1; n = 216), 42 months (Time 2; n = 192), and 54 months (Time 3; n = 168) of age. Parents', nonparental caregivers', and/or observers' ratings were obtained for all 3 constructs at all 3 times, as were multiple behavioral indices of each construct. Several alternative factor structures were tested, including 1-, 2-, and 3-factor models. The best fitting and most parsimonious model was one with 3 separate latent constructs at 42 and 54 months and 2 distinct constructs, EC and impulsivity/low inhibition to novelty combined, at 30 months. EC, IMP, and NOV also demonstrated some interindividual consistency across time, especially EC and IMP.
本研究的主要目的是检验在 30 个月(时间 1;n=216)、42 个月(时间 2;n=192)和 54 个月(时间 3;n=168)时,努力控制(EC;努力调节)、反应性失控(IMP;例如,冲动、接近速度)和反应性过控(NOV;对新奇的抑制)是否是 3 个不同的结构。所有 3 个结构在所有 3 个时间点都由父母、非父母照顾者和/或观察员进行了评估,同时还评估了每个结构的多个行为指标。测试了几种替代的因子结构,包括 1-、2-和 3-因子模型。在 42 个月和 54 个月时,最佳拟合且最简约的模型是具有 3 个独立潜在结构的模型,而在 30 个月时,最佳拟合且最简约的模型是具有 2 个独立结构的模型,即 EC 和冲动/对新奇的低抑制相结合。EC、IMP 和 NOV 也表现出一定的个体间一致性,尤其是 EC 和 IMP。