• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择性税收作为一种与 IHD 和营养相关癌症相关的经济工具的健康益处。

The health benefits of selective taxation as an economic instrument in relation to IHD and nutrition-related cancers.

机构信息

1 Department of Public Health, Section of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, CSS, Øster Farimagsgade 5, DK-1014 Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2013 Dec;16(12):2124-31. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013000153. Epub 2013 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980013000153
PMID:23399106
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10271833/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to estimate the health benefits of selective taxation of healthy and unhealthy food commodities in relation to CVD and nutrition-related cancers.

DESIGN

The potential health effects of a selective taxation scenario were estimated as changes in the burden of disease, measured by disability-adjusted life years, from health outcomes affected by the changes in food intake. The change in burden of a disease was calculated as the change in incidence of the disease due to a modified exposure level, using the potential impact fraction. Estimates of relative risk for the associations between various foods and relevant diseases were found through a literature search and used in the calculation of potential impact fractions.

SETTING

The study was based in Denmark, estimating the health effects of a Danish selective taxation scenario.

SUBJECTS

The potential health effects of selective taxation were modelled for the adult Danish population.

RESULTS

Halving the rate of value-added tax on fruit and vegetables and increasing the tax on fats would result in moderate reductions in the burden of disease from IHD, ischaemic stroke, and colorectal, lung and breast cancer (0·4–2·4 % change). The largest effect could be obtained through increased intake of fruit and vegetables (0·9–2·4 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Applying selective taxation to healthy and unhealthy foods can moderately reduce the burden of disease in the Danish population.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估针对健康食品和不健康食品征收选择性税收对心血管疾病和营养相关癌症的健康效益。

设计

通过改变与饮食摄入变化相关的健康结果来评估选择性税收方案的潜在健康影响,用伤残调整生命年来衡量疾病负担的变化。通过使用潜在影响分数,计算由于暴露水平变化而导致疾病发病率的变化,从而得出疾病负担的变化。通过文献检索发现了各种食物与相关疾病之间的关联的相对风险估计值,并将其用于潜在影响分数的计算。

地点

本研究以丹麦为基础,估计丹麦选择性税收方案的健康影响。

对象

为丹麦成年人口建立了选择性税收的潜在健康影响模型。

结果

将水果和蔬菜的增值税税率减半,并提高脂肪税,将导致冠心病、缺血性中风以及结直肠癌、肺癌和乳腺癌的疾病负担适度减少(0.4%2.4%的变化)。通过增加水果和蔬菜的摄入量(0.9%2.4%),可以获得最大的效果。

结论

对健康食品和不健康食品征收选择性税收可以适度减轻丹麦人群的疾病负担。

相似文献

1
The health benefits of selective taxation as an economic instrument in relation to IHD and nutrition-related cancers.选择性税收作为一种与 IHD 和营养相关癌症相关的经济工具的健康益处。
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Dec;16(12):2124-31. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013000153. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
2
Healthy food subsidies and unhealthy food taxation: A systematic review of the evidence.健康食品补贴与不健康食品征税:证据的系统综述
Nutrition. 2015 Jun;31(6):787-95. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2014.12.010. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
3
The effects of the Danish saturated fat tax on food and nutrient intake and modelled health outcomes: an econometric and comparative risk assessment evaluation.丹麦饱和脂肪税对食物和营养摄入以及模拟健康结果的影响:计量经济学和比较风险评估评价
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016 Jun;70(6):681-6. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.6. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
4
Modelling income group differences in the health and economic impacts of targeted food taxes and subsidies.模拟有针对性的食物税收和补贴对健康和经济影响的收入群体差异。
Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;38(5):1324-33. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp214. Epub 2009 May 29.
5
The global context for public health nutrition taxation.公共卫生营养税收的全球背景。
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Jan;14(1):176-86. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010002053. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
6
State-of-the-art for food taxes to promote public health.促进公共健康的食品税收的最新技术。
Proc Nutr Soc. 2018 May;77(2):100-105. doi: 10.1017/S0029665117004050. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
7
Food and vessels: the importance of a healthy diet to prevent cardiovascular disease.食物与血管:健康饮食对预防心血管疾病的重要性。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Feb;17(1):50-5. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32832f3a76.
8
Substituting polyunsaturated fat for saturated fat: A health impact assessment of a fat tax in seven European countries.用多不饱和脂肪替代饱和脂肪:对七个欧洲国家征收脂肪税的健康影响评估。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 10;14(7):e0218464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218464. eCollection 2019.
9
Taxation of unprocessed sugar or sugar-added foods for reducing their consumption and preventing obesity or other adverse health outcomes.对未加工糖或添加糖食品征税以减少其消费并预防肥胖或其他不良健康后果。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 9;4(4):CD012333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012333.pub2.
10
Economic instruments for obesity prevention: results of a scoping review and modified Delphi survey.经济手段预防肥胖:系统评价和改良德尔菲调查结果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Oct 6;8:109. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-109.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospects of Food Taxes for Planetary Health: A Systematic Review of Modeling Studies.食品税对地球健康的前景:建模研究的系统评价
Nutr Rev. 2025 Mar 1;83(3):503-524. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae111.
2
Embedding the Community and Individuals in Disease Prevention.让社区和个人参与疾病预防。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 4;9:826776. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.826776. eCollection 2022.
3
To what extent could cardiovascular diseases be reduced if Germany applied fiscal policies to increase fruit and vegetable consumption? A quantitative health impact assessment.如果德国实施财政政策以增加水果和蔬菜的消费,心血管疾病的减少程度会有多大?一项定量健康影响评估。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jun;24(9):2570-2576. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020000634. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Lifestyle-Related Interventions for the Primary Prevention of Breast Cancer: A Rapid Review.乳腺癌一级预防中生活方式相关干预措施的成本效益:快速综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Feb 5;6:325. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00325. eCollection 2019.
5
Fruit and vegetable import duty reduction in Fiji to prevent obesity and non-communicable diseases: a case study.斐济降低水果和蔬菜的进口关税以预防肥胖和非传染性疾病:案例研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Jan;23(1):181-188. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019002660. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
6
Systematic Literature Review of Food-Intake Monitoring in an Aging Population.系统评价老龄化人口食物摄入监测文献。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jul 24;19(15):3265. doi: 10.3390/s19153265.
7
Towards comprehensive global monitoring of food environments and policies to reduce diet-related non-communicable diseases.迈向对食物环境和政策进行全面全球监测以减少与饮食相关的非传染性疾病。
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Dec;16(12):2101-4. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013002887.

本文引用的文献

1
Dietary fibre, whole grains, and risk of colorectal cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.膳食纤维、全谷物与结直肠癌风险:前瞻性研究的系统评价和剂量-反应荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2011 Nov 10;343:d6617. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6617.
2
Dietary fiber intake and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.膳食纤维摄入量与乳腺癌风险:前瞻性队列研究的荟萃分析。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Sep;94(3):900-5. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.015578. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
3
Could targeted food taxes improve health?有针对性的食品税能改善健康状况吗?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Aug;61(8):689-94. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.047746.
4
Cost-effective design of economic instruments in nutrition policy.营养政策中经济手段的成本效益设计。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007 Apr 4;4:10. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-4-10.
5
Effectiveness of monetary incentives in modifying dietary behavior:a review of randomized, controlled trials.货币激励对改变饮食行为的有效性:随机对照试验综述
Nutr Rev. 2006 Dec;64(12):518-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2006.tb00185.x.
6
Causes of cancer in the world: comparative risk assessment of nine behavioural and environmental risk factors.全球癌症病因:九种行为和环境风险因素的比较风险评估
Lancet. 2005 Nov 19;366(9499):1784-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67725-2.
7
The European Common Agricultural Policy on fruits and vegetables: exploring potential health gain from reform.欧洲关于水果和蔬菜的共同农业政策:探索改革带来的潜在健康益处。
Eur J Public Health. 2006 Feb;16(1):31-5. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki166. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
8
Food and health in Europe: a new basis for action.欧洲的食品与健康:行动的新基础。
WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser. 2004(96):i-xvi, 1-385, back cover.
9
Dietary fiber and risk of coronary heart disease: a pooled analysis of cohort studies.膳食纤维与冠心病风险:队列研究的汇总分析
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Feb 23;164(4):370-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.4.370.
10
Dietary fat and breast cancer risk revisited: a meta-analysis of the published literature.再探膳食脂肪与乳腺癌风险:已发表文献的荟萃分析
Br J Cancer. 2003 Nov 3;89(9):1672-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601314.