Suppr超能文献

抗糖尿病药物与糖尿病患者胰腺癌风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Anti-diabetic medications and risk of pancreatic cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Apr;108(4):510-9; quiz 520. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.7. Epub 2013 Feb 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Several preclinical and observational studies have shown that anti-diabetic medications (ADMs) may modify the risk of pancreatic cancer (PaC). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effect of metformin, sulfonylureas (SUs), thiazolidinediones (TZDs), and insulin on the risk of PaC in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science, up to June 2012, and published abstracts from major gastroenterology and oncology meetings from 2003 to 2012. Studies were included if they (1) evaluated and clearly defined exposure to metformin, SU, TZDs, and/or insulin, (2) reported PaC outcomes in patients with DM and (3) reported relative risks or odds ratio (OR) or provided data for their estimation. Summary OR estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Eleven studies (6 cohort, 3 case-control, and 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs)) reported 1770 cases of PaC in 730,664 patients with DM. Meta-analysis of observational studies showed no significant association between metformin (n=9 studies; adjusted OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.57-1.03, P=0.073), insulin (n=7 studies; adjusted OR 1.59, 95% CI 0.85-2.96, P=0.144), or TZD (n=4 studies; adjusted OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.81-1.30, P=0.844) use and risk of developing PaC. Use of SU was associated with a 70% increase in the odds of PaC (n=8 studies; adjusted OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.27-2.28, P<0.001). There was considerable inherent heterogeneity between studies not explained by study design, setting, or comparator drug and is likely related to confounding by indication and reverse causality. The pooled analyses of the two RCTs were underpowered and provided non-significant results with wide, non-informative 95% CIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Although SU seems to be associated with increased risk of PaC, meta-analysis of existing studies does not support a protective or harmful association between ADM use and risk of PaC in patients with DM. There was considerable heterogeneity across studies, and future, well-designed, prospective studies would be required to understand this association better.

摘要

目的

几项临床前和观察性研究表明,抗糖尿病药物(ADM)可能改变胰腺癌(PaC)的风险。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,评估二甲双胍、磺酰脲类(SUs)、噻唑烷二酮(TZDs)和胰岛素在糖尿病患者中对 PaC 风险的影响。

方法

我们对 Medline、EMBASE 和 Web of Science 进行了系统检索,截至 2012 年 6 月,并对 2003 年至 2012 年主要的胃肠病学和肿瘤学会议的已发表摘要进行了检索。如果研究(1)评估并明确界定二甲双胍、SU、TZDs 和/或胰岛素的暴露情况,(2)报告糖尿病患者的 PaC 结局,(3)报告相对风险或比值比(OR)或提供估计数据,则纳入研究。使用随机效应模型估计具有 95%置信区间(CI)的汇总 OR 估计值。

结果

11 项研究(6 项队列研究、3 项病例对照研究和 2 项随机对照试验(RCT))报告了 730664 例糖尿病患者中 1770 例 PaC。对观察性研究的荟萃分析显示,二甲双胍(n=9 项研究;调整后的 OR 0.76,95%CI 0.57-1.03,P=0.073)、胰岛素(n=7 项研究;调整后的 OR 1.59,95%CI 0.85-2.96,P=0.144)或 TZD(n=4 项研究;调整后的 OR 1.02,95%CI 0.81-1.30,P=0.844)使用与 PaC 风险之间无显著关联。SU 的使用与 PaC 发生的几率增加 70%相关(n=8 项研究;调整后的 OR 1.70,95%CI 1.27-2.28,P<0.001)。研究之间存在很大的固有异质性,无法用研究设计、环境或比较药物来解释,这可能与指示性偏倚和反向因果关系有关。两项 RCT 的汇总分析结果效力不足,提供的结果不显著,95%CI 范围较宽,信息不丰富。

结论

尽管 SU 似乎与 PaC 风险增加相关,但现有研究的荟萃分析并不支持 ADM 使用与糖尿病患者 PaC 风险之间存在保护或有害关联。研究之间存在很大的异质性,需要进一步进行设计良好的前瞻性研究来更好地了解这种关联。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验