• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗具有 EGFR 敏感突变的患者:一线还是二线——有区别吗?

Treating patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutations: first line or second line--is there a difference?

机构信息

Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar 10;31(8):1081-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.0652. Epub 2013 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.2012.43.0652
PMID:23401448
Abstract

First-line epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR TKI) is a standard treatment for patients with activating EGFR mutations. Six randomized studies have demonstrated consistent improvement in tumor response rate and progression-free survival over platinum-based combination chemotherapy. The only reason to consider EGFR TKI as second-line therapy is that none of the six comparative studies has shown improvement in overall survival, which can be explained by the high proportion of patients from the chemotherapy arm crossing over to the EGFR TKI arm on progression. It is true that patients with EGFR mutations may benefit from second-line EGFR TKI therapy, but we cannot conclude that the benefit is either equal to or inferior to first-line EGFR TKI therapy. To date, there are no direct comparative data between first- and second-line EGFR TKI in patients with activating EGFR mutations. Tumor response rates to second-line EGFR TKI have been inconsistent, which could potentially be explained by the impact of first-line chemotherapy on the abundance of tumor cells with activating EGFR mutations. However, numerous arguments, including assurance on drug exposure, improvement in quality of life, better tolerance by patients with poor performance status, and deferral of whole-brain radiation therapy for patients with brain metastasis, support the general application of first-line EGFR TKI.

摘要

一线表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂 (EGFR TKI) 是具有激活 EGFR 突变患者的标准治疗方法。六项随机研究表明,与铂类联合化疗相比,肿瘤反应率和无进展生存期均有一致改善。唯一考虑将 EGFR TKI 作为二线治疗的原因是,这六项对比研究中没有一项显示总体生存率有所改善,这可以用化疗组中很大一部分患者在进展时交叉到 EGFR TKI 组来解释。确实,具有 EGFR 突变的患者可能受益于二线 EGFR TKI 治疗,但我们不能得出结论认为二线 EGFR TKI 治疗的获益与一线 EGFR TKI 治疗相等或不如一线 EGFR TKI 治疗。迄今为止,在具有激活 EGFR 突变的患者中,尚无一线和二线 EGFR TKI 之间的直接对比数据。二线 EGFR TKI 的肿瘤反应率不一致,这可能是由于一线化疗对具有激活 EGFR 突变的肿瘤细胞丰度的影响。然而,许多论点,包括药物暴露的保证、生活质量的改善、对表现状态较差的患者更好的耐受性,以及对有脑转移的患者推迟全脑放疗,支持一线 EGFR TKI 的广泛应用。

相似文献

1
Treating patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutations: first line or second line--is there a difference?治疗具有 EGFR 敏感突变的患者:一线还是二线——有区别吗?
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar 10;31(8):1081-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.0652. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
2
Comparison of EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.比较 EGFR-TKI 和化疗在晚期 EGFR 突变阳性 NSCLC 的一线治疗中的疗效。
Neoplasma. 2013;60(4):425-31. doi: 10.4149/neo_2013_055.
3
CNS metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer: current role of EGFR-TKI therapy and future perspectives.非小细胞肺癌中的中枢神经系统转移:EGFR-TKI 治疗的现状和未来展望。
Lung Cancer. 2013 Jun;80(3):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
4
Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations detected by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography in nonsmall cell lung cancer: impact on response to therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors.非小细胞肺癌中变性高效液相色谱法检测表皮生长因子受体突变:对表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗反应的影响。
Cancer. 2010 Sep 15;116(18):4309-17. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25214.
5
Efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of 13 randomized trials.表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂在表皮生长因子受体突变型非小细胞肺癌患者中的疗效:13 项随机试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2012 Mar;13(2):107-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
6
Selecting patients for treatment with epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.选择接受表皮生长因子酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗的患者。
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Aug 1;13(15 Pt 2):s4606-12. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0332.
7
Integration of EGFR inhibitors and conventional chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.表皮生长因子受体抑制剂与常规化疗联合治疗非小细胞肺癌。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2011 Nov;12(6):350-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2011.03.029. Epub 2011 May 20.
8
Ongoing first-line studies of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in select patient populations.表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂在特定患者群体中的一线研究正在进行。
Semin Oncol. 2005 Dec;32(6 Suppl 10):S9-15. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2005.10.004.
9
A diagnostic algorithm using EGFR mutation-specific antibodies for rapid response EGFR-TKI treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.一种使用 EGFR 突变特异性抗体的诊断算法,用于快速响应 EGFR-TKI 治疗非小细胞肺癌患者。
Lung Cancer. 2012 Oct;78(1):39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
10
Effect of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase domain mutations on the outcome of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶结构域突变对接受表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者预后的影响。
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Jul 15;12(14 Pt 2):4416s-4420s. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0555.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the prognosis of metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in the era of modern systemic therapies: a multivariable analysis of 343 patients treated in Poland.评估现代全身治疗时代转移性或复发性非小细胞肺癌的预后:对波兰343例接受治疗患者的多变量分析
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025 Jul 31;14(7):2688-2699. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-2025-299. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
2
Efficacy and safety of Toliparibumab for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.托利帕单抗治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2024 Nov 7;14:1444312. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1444312. eCollection 2024.
3
Gefitinib-Induced Severe Dermatological Adverse Reactions: A Case Report and Pharmacogenetic Profile.
吉非替尼诱发的严重皮肤不良反应:一例报告及药物遗传学特征
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Aug 7;17(8):1040. doi: 10.3390/ph17081040.
4
Network meta-analysis of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50.PD-L1 表达水平≥50%的晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者一线免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的网络荟萃分析
BMC Cancer. 2023 Aug 23;23(1):791. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11285-4.
5
Thoracic stereotactic body radiation therapy plus first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant polymetastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: A propensity-matched retrospective study.表皮生长因子受体突变型广泛期非小细胞肺癌患者行立体定向体部放疗联合一线酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗:一项倾向性匹配回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Sep 17;100(37):e27279. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027279.
6
Efficacy and acquired resistance for EGFR-TKI plus thoracic SBRT in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched retrospective study.在晚期 EGFR 突变型非小细胞肺癌患者中,EGFR-TKI 联合胸部 SBRT 的疗效和获得性耐药:一项倾向评分匹配的回顾性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Apr 30;21(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08228-2.
7
Detection of EGFR Mutations in Cerebrospinal Fluid of EGFR-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma With Brain Metastases.伴有脑转移的EGFR突变型肺腺癌患者脑脊液中EGFR突变的检测
Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 22;11:622142. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.622142. eCollection 2021.
8
Compare the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a Bayesian analysis.比较程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)和程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)抑制剂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性:一项贝叶斯分析。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020 Aug;9(4):1302-1323. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-192.
9
Long non-coding RNA LOC554202 promotes acquired gefitinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer through upregulating miR-31 expression.长链非编码RNA LOC554202通过上调miR-31表达促进非小细胞肺癌对吉非替尼的获得性耐药。
J Cancer. 2019 Oct 15;10(24):6003-6013. doi: 10.7150/jca.35097. eCollection 2019.
10
(PG2) Enhances the M1 Polarization of Macrophages, Functional Maturation of Dendritic Cells, and T Cell-Mediated Anticancer Immune Responses in Patients with Lung Cancer.(PG2)增强肺癌患者的巨噬细胞 M1 极化、树突状细胞功能成熟和 T 细胞介导的抗癌免疫反应。
Nutrients. 2019 Sep 20;11(10):2264. doi: 10.3390/nu11102264.