National Resource Center for Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, N-0319 Oslo, Norway.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Jul;65(7):1043-51. doi: 10.1002/acr.21976.
To develop and test a new instrument for patient self-reported quality of osteoarthritis (OA) care, and to provide quality indicator (QI) pass rates in a Norwegian OA cohort.
The OsteoArthritis Quality Indicator (OA-QI) questionnaire was developed using published QIs, expert panels, and patient interviews. Self-reported data were collected from 359 persons in a Norwegian OA cohort, and test-retest reliability and validity were assessed. Separate QI pass rates and summary QI pass rates were calculated.
The 17-item questionnaire includes QIs related to patient education and information, regular provider assessments, referrals, and pharmacologic treatment. The patient self-reported questionnaire was completed with minimal respondent burden. Support for content validity was confirmed by 2 patient research partners and 2 expert panels. All 10 predefined hypotheses relating to construct validity were confirmed. Test-retest kappa coefficients ranged from 0.20-0.80 and the percentage of exact agreement ranged from 62-90%. The mean pass rate for individual QIs was 31% (range 5-49%). The median summary QI pass rate was 27% (interquartile range 12-50%), with lower summary pass rates for nonpharmacologic compared to pharmacologic treatments.
To our knowledge, this is the first instrument developed to measure patient-reported QI pass rates for OA care. This study indicates that the OA-QI questionnaire is acceptable to persons with OA, and its short format makes it suitable for population surveys. The low patient self-reported QI pass rates in this study suggest a potential for quality improvement in OA care.
开发并验证一种新的用于患者自评骨关节炎(OA)护理质量的工具,并提供挪威 OA 队列的质量指标(QI)合格率。
使用已发表的 QI、专家小组和患者访谈开发了骨关节炎质量指标(OA-QI)问卷。从挪威 OA 队列中的 359 名患者中收集了自我报告数据,并评估了测试-重测信度和有效性。分别计算了 QI 合格率和综合 QI 合格率。
该 17 项问卷包括与患者教育和信息、定期提供者评估、转诊和药物治疗相关的 QI。患者自我报告问卷的完成几乎没有给受访者带来负担。由 2 名患者研究伙伴和 2 名专家小组对内容有效性提供的支持得到了确认。所有与结构有效性相关的 10 个预设假设均得到了确认。测试-重测 Kappa 系数范围为 0.20-0.80,完全一致的百分比范围为 62-90%。个别 QI 的平均合格率为 31%(范围为 5-49%)。综合 QI 的中位数合格率为 27%(四分位间距为 12-50%),非药物治疗的综合合格率低于药物治疗。
据我们所知,这是第一个用于衡量 OA 护理患者报告 QI 合格率的工具。本研究表明,OA-QI 问卷可被 OA 患者接受,其简短的格式使其适合人群调查。本研究中患者自我报告的 QI 合格率较低,表明 OA 护理质量有改进的潜力。