Soejoedono Retno D, Murtini Sri, Palya Vilmos, Felföldi Balázs, Mató Tamás, Gardin Yannick
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia.
Avian Dis. 2012 Dec;56(4 Suppl):923-7. doi: 10.1637/10169-041012-ResNote.1.
The swift evolution rate of avian influenza (AI) H5N1 virus demands constant efforts to update inactivated vaccines to match antigenically with the emerging new field virus strains. Recently, a recombinant turkey herpesvirus (rHVT)-AI vaccine, rHVT-H5, expressing the HA gene of a highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 clade 2.2 A/Swan/Hungary/499/ 2006 strain inserted into FC-126 strain of HVT vector, has been developed to combat current threats in poultry industry. Here, we present the results of two trials where rHVT-H5 was tested alone or in combination with inactivated H5N1 vaccines (the latter vaccines contained antigens produced by using a clade 2.1.3 HPAI H5N1 virus [A/Ck/WestJava-Nagrak/2007] in the first trial or mixture of antigen produced by strain A/Ck/WestJava-Nagrak/2007 and A/Ck/Banten-Tangerang/2010 [bivalent vaccine] for second trial) in broiler chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) carrying maternally derived antibodies to H5N1 and then challenged with Indonesian HPAI H5N1 field isolates. The effectiveness of vaccination was evaluated on the basis of clinical protection (morbidity and mortality) and measurement of virus shedding after challenge. Immune response to vaccination was followed by serology. In the first experiment, chickens were vaccinated at the day of hatch with rHVT-H5 alone (Group 1) or combined with inactivated vaccine at day old (Group 2) or at 10 days of age (Group 3). The chickens along with nonvaccinated hatch-mates were challenged at 28 days of age with the HPAI H5N1 field isolate dade 2.1.3 A/Chicken/WestJava-Subang/29/2007. Eighty, 100%, and 80% clinical protection was recorded in Group 1, 2, and 3, respectively. A similar experiment was performed a second time, but the chicks in Group 3 received the inactivated vaccine earlier, at 7 days of age. Challenge was performed at 28 days of age using a different H5N1 isolate, clade 2.1.3 A/Ck/Purwakarta-Cilingga/142/10. Clinical protection achieved in the second trial was 95%, 75%, and 90% in Group 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Shedding of challenge virus was significantly lower in the vaccinated groups compared with controls in both experiments. Vaccinated birds developed hemagglutination inhibition antibody response to H5N1 by the time of challenge. These experiments confirmed that the rHVT-H5 vaccine applied alone or in combination with inactivated H5N1 vaccines could provide high level (> 80%) clinical protection against divergent HPAI H5N1 field isolates after single immunization by 4 wk of age and a significant reduction in the excretion of challenge virus.
禽流感(AI)H5N1病毒迅速的进化速度要求我们不断努力更新灭活疫苗,使其在抗原性上与新出现的野外病毒株相匹配。最近,一种重组火鸡疱疹病毒(rHVT)-禽流感疫苗,即rHVT-H5,已被研发出来,它将高致病性禽流感(HPAI)H5N1 2.2分支A/天鹅/匈牙利/499/2006毒株的血凝素(HA)基因插入HVT载体的FC-126毒株中,以应对家禽业当前面临的威胁。在此,我们展示了两项试验的结果,在这两项试验中,rHVT-H5单独进行测试,或与灭活H5N1疫苗联合使用(在第一项试验中,后一种疫苗包含使用2.1.3分支HPAI H5N1病毒[A/鸡/西爪哇-纳格拉克/2007]生产的抗原;在第二项试验中,是A/鸡/西爪哇-纳格拉克/2007和A/鸡/万丹-坦格朗/2010毒株生产的抗原混合物[二价疫苗]),用于接种携带母源H5N1抗体的肉鸡(家鸡),然后用印度尼西亚HPAI H5N1野外分离株进行攻毒。根据临床保护情况(发病率和死亡率)以及攻毒后病毒排毒量的测定来评估疫苗接种的效果。通过血清学方法跟踪疫苗接种后的免疫反应。在第一个实验中,雏鸡在出壳当天单独接种rHVT-H5(第1组),或在日龄时(第2组)或10日龄时(第3组)与灭活疫苗联合接种。这些雏鸡以及未接种疫苗的同批出壳雏鸡在28日龄时用HPAI H5N1野外分离株2.1.3 A/鸡/西爪哇-苏邦/29/2007进行攻毒。第1组、第2组和第3组的临床保护率分别记录为80%、100%和80%。第二次进行了类似的实验,但第3组的雏鸡在7日龄时更早地接种了灭活疫苗。在28日龄时使用不同的H5N1分离株2.1.3 A/鸡/普哇卡塔-芝林加/142/10进行攻毒。在第二项试验中,第1组、第2组和第3组的临床保护率分别为95%、75%和90%。在两项实验中,与对照组相比,接种疫苗组的攻毒病毒排毒量显著更低。接种疫苗的鸡在攻毒时产生了针对H5N1的血凝抑制抗体反应。这些实验证实,单独使用或与灭活H5N1疫苗联合使用的rHVT-H5疫苗,在4周龄时单次免疫后,可对不同的HPAI H5N1野外分离株提供高水平(>80%)的临床保护,并显著减少攻毒病毒的排泄。