Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2013;42(2):274-86. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.764824. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
Five decades of randomized trials research have produced dozens of evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) for youths. The EBPs produce respectable effects in traditional efficacy trials, but the effects shrink markedly when EBPs are tested in practice contexts with clinically referred youths and compared to usual clinical care. We considered why this might be the case. We examined relevant research literature and drew examples from our own research in practice settings. One reason for the falloff in EBP effects may be that so little youth treatment research has been done in the context of everyday practice. Researchers may have missed opportunities to learn how to make EBPs work well in the actual youth mental health ecosystem, in which so many real-world factors are at play that cannot be controlled experimentally. We sketch components and characteristics of that ecosystem, including clinically referred youths, their caregivers and families, the practitioners who provide their care, the organizations within which care is provided, the network of youth service systems (e.g., child welfare, education), and the policy context (e.g., reimbursement regulations and incentives). We suggest six strategies for future research on EBPs within the youth mental health ecosystem, including reliance on the deployment-focused model of development and testing, testing the mettle of current EBPs in everyday practice contexts, using the heuristic potential of usual care, testing restructured and integrative adaptations of EBPs, studying the use of treatment response feedback to guide clinical care, and testing models of the relation between policy change and EBP implementation.
五十年来的随机试验研究为青少年产生了数十种基于证据的心理治疗方法(EBPs)。这些 EBP 在传统的疗效试验中产生了可观的效果,但当在有临床推荐的青少年和与常规临床护理进行比较的实践环境中进行测试时,效果明显缩小。我们考虑了为什么会这样。我们检查了相关的研究文献,并从我们自己在实践环境中的研究中举例说明。EBP 效果下降的一个原因可能是,在日常实践背景下,青少年治疗研究做得太少。研究人员可能错过了学习如何使 EBP 在实际的青少年心理健康生态系统中发挥作用的机会,在这个生态系统中,有太多的现实因素在起作用,无法通过实验来控制。我们简要描述了该生态系统的组成部分和特征,包括有临床推荐的青少年、他们的照顾者和家庭、提供护理的从业者、提供护理的组织、青少年服务系统网络(例如儿童福利、教育)以及政策背景(例如报销法规和激励措施)。我们提出了未来在青少年心理健康生态系统中进行 EBP 研究的六项策略,包括依赖以部署为重点的发展和测试模型、在日常实践环境中测试现有 EBP 的韧性、利用常规护理的启发潜力、测试 EBP 的重构和综合适应、研究使用治疗反应反馈来指导临床护理以及测试政策变化与 EBP 实施之间关系的模型。