• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亲密关系中的距离差异:对关系幸福感、稳定性和心理健康的影响。

Closeness discrepancies in romantic relationships: implications for relational well-being, stability, and mental health.

机构信息

Mailman School of Public Health, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University, 60 Haven Avenue B2, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Apr;39(4):456-69. doi: 10.1177/0146167213476896. Epub 2013 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1177/0146167213476896
PMID:23407747
Abstract

Experiences of closeness in romantic relationships are associated with heightened levels of relational well-being and mental health. However, individuals differ in the degree of closeness they desire in their relationships. This study used the construct of inclusion of other in self (IOS) to analyze discrepancies between individuals' actual and ideal levels of closeness in their relationships and the implications of these discrepancies for relational well-being and mental health. A longitudinal survey of partnered individuals demonstrated that optimal levels of relational well-being and mental health existed when individuals had minimal discrepancies between actual and ideal IOS, regardless of their actual levels of IOS. Individuals whose actual levels of IOS moved closer to their ideal levels over a 2-year period reported improved relational well-being and mental health. Individuals with little to no discrepancies between actual and ideal IOS were also less likely to break-up with their partners over time.

摘要

在浪漫关系中体验到亲密感与更高水平的关系幸福感和心理健康有关。然而,个体之间在他们关系中渴望的亲密程度存在差异。本研究使用他人纳入自我的构念(IOS)来分析个体在关系中实际和理想亲密程度之间的差异,以及这些差异对关系幸福感和心理健康的影响。对伴侣个体的纵向调查表明,当个体在实际和理想 IOS 之间的差异最小时,存在最佳的关系幸福感和心理健康水平,而不管他们的实际 IOS 水平如何。在两年的时间里,IOS 的实际水平更接近理想水平的个体报告说,他们的关系幸福感和心理健康得到了改善。在实际和理想 IOS 之间几乎没有差异的个体,随着时间的推移,与伴侣分手的可能性也较小。

相似文献

1
Closeness discrepancies in romantic relationships: implications for relational well-being, stability, and mental health.亲密关系中的距离差异:对关系幸福感、稳定性和心理健康的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Apr;39(4):456-69. doi: 10.1177/0146167213476896. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
2
Love styles and desire for closeness in romantic relationships.恋爱关系中的爱情风格与亲密渴望
Psychol Rep. 2009 Aug;105(1):191-7. doi: 10.2466/PR0.105.1.191-197.
3
Psychological health and change in closeness in platonic and romantic relationships.心理健康与柏拉图式和浪漫关系中亲密度的变化。
J Soc Psychol. 1999 Dec;139(6):762-7. doi: 10.1080/00224549909598255.
4
Self-determination theory and romantic relationship processes.自我决定理论与浪漫关系过程。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2013 Nov;17(4):307-24. doi: 10.1177/1088868313498000. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
5
Closeness Discrepancies and Relationship Quality in German Partnered Women and Men.德国伴侣女性和男性的亲密差距与关系质量。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2024;50(6):757-772. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2024.2360980. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
6
Sexual disclosures: connections to relational satisfaction and closeness.性方面的自我表露:与关系满意度和亲密感的关联。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2014;40(6):577-91. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2013.811449. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
7
Sexual Closeness Discrepancies: What They Are and Why They Matter for Sexual Well-Being in Romantic Relationships.性亲密差异:其内涵及对浪漫关系中性福祉的重要性
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Nov;46(8):2353-2364. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-0960-2. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
8
How does culture influence the degree of romantic loneliness and closeness?文化如何影响浪漫孤独感和亲密感的程度?
J Psychol. 2008 Mar;142(2):209-16. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.142.2.209-220.
9
Secret romantic relationships: consequences for personal and relational well-being.秘密浪漫关系:对个人和关系幸福感的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Nov;35(11):1452-66. doi: 10.1177/0146167209342594. Epub 2009 Aug 27.
10
The pushes and pulls of close relationships: attachment insecurities and relational ambivalence.亲密关系的推拉:依恋不安全感和关系矛盾情感。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Mar;98(3):450-68. doi: 10.1037/a0017366.

引用本文的文献

1
A Cautionary Tale: Digital Clinical Trial Implementation of a Couples-Based HIV Prevention Study among Transgender Women and Their Partners in the United States.一个警示故事:在美国跨性别女性及其伴侣中开展的一项基于伴侣的艾滋病毒预防研究的数字化临床试验实施情况
AIDS Behav. 2025 Jan;29(1):37-44. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04477-x. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
2
The Associations between Human-Companion Animal Relationship Duration, Companion Animal Life Stage, and Relationship Quality.人类与伴侣动物关系的持续时间、伴侣动物的生命阶段和关系质量之间的关联。
Animals (Basel). 2024 May 29;14(11):1606. doi: 10.3390/ani14111606.
3
A mixed-methods study of relationship stigma and well-being among sexual and gender minority couples.
一项关于性取向和性别少数群体伴侣之间关系污名与幸福感的混合方法研究。
J Soc Issues. 2023 Mar;79(1):232-263. doi: 10.1111/josi.12552. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
4
"Lovesick": Mental Health and Romantic Relationships among College Students.《单恋:大学生心理健康与恋爱关系》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 30;20(1):641. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010641.
5
Not All That Glitters Is Gold: Attractive Partners Provide Joys and Sorrows.并非所有闪光的都是金子:有魅力的伴侣带来欢乐和悲伤。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;19(20):13526. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013526.
6
Motivational Interdependence in Couple Relationships.夫妻关系中的动机性相互依赖
Front Psychol. 2022 May 23;13:827746. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.827746. eCollection 2022.
7
Pair-Bonding as Inclusion of Other in the Self: A Literature Review.作为自我中对他人接纳的伴侣关系:文献综述
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 24;10:2399. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02399. eCollection 2019.
8
"Stay or Leave": Predictors of Relationship Dissolution in Emerging Adulthood.《留下还是离开:成年初期关系解体的预测因素》
Emerg Adulthood. 2017 Aug;5(4):241-250. doi: 10.1177/2167696817699750. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
9
Closeness Discrepancies and Intimacy Interference: Motivations for HIV Prevention Behavior in Primary Romantic Relationships.亲密关系差异与亲昵干扰:主要恋爱关系中预防 HIV 的行为动机。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Feb;45(2):270-283. doi: 10.1177/0146167218783196. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
10
Ideal Standards, Acceptance, and Relationship Satisfaction: Latitudes of Differential Effects.理想标准、接纳与关系满意度:差异效应的范围
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 28;8:1691. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01691. eCollection 2017.