• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理想标准、接纳与关系满意度:差异效应的范围

Ideal Standards, Acceptance, and Relationship Satisfaction: Latitudes of Differential Effects.

作者信息

Buyukcan-Tetik Asuman, Campbell Lorne, Finkenauer Catrin, Karremans Johan C, Kappen Gesa

机构信息

Psychology Program, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 28;8:1691. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01691. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01691
PMID:29033876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5625328/
Abstract

We examined whether the relations of consistency between ideal standards and perceptions of a current romantic partner with partner acceptance and relationship satisfaction level off, or decelerate, above a threshold. We tested our hypothesis using a 3-year longitudinal data set collected from heterosexual newlywed couples. We used two indicators of consistency: pattern correspondence (within-person correlation between ideal standards and perceived partner ratings) and mean-level match (difference between ideal standards score and perceived partner score). Our results revealed that pattern correspondence had no relation with partner acceptance, but a positive linear/exponential association with relationship satisfaction. Mean-level match had a significant positive association with actor's acceptance and relationship satisfaction up to the point where perceived partner score equaled ideal standards score. Partner effects did not show a consistent pattern. The results suggest that the consistency between ideal standards and perceived partner attributes has a non-linear association with acceptance and relationship satisfaction, although the results were more conclusive for mean-level match.

摘要

我们研究了理想标准与当前浪漫伴侣认知之间的一致性关系,以及伴侣接纳度和关系满意度是否会在某个阈值以上趋于平稳或减缓。我们使用从异性新婚夫妇收集的三年纵向数据集来检验我们的假设。我们使用了两个一致性指标:模式对应(理想标准与感知到的伴侣评分之间的个体内相关性)和平均水平匹配(理想标准得分与感知到的伴侣得分之间的差异)。我们的结果表明,模式对应与伴侣接纳度无关,但与关系满意度呈正线性/指数关联。平均水平匹配与行为者的接纳度和关系满意度呈显著正相关,直到感知到的伴侣得分等于理想标准得分。伴侣效应没有呈现出一致的模式。结果表明,理想标准与感知到的伴侣属性之间的一致性与接纳度和关系满意度呈非线性关联,尽管平均水平匹配的结果更具决定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac73/5625328/6c61d5cb2310/fpsyg-08-01691-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac73/5625328/6c61d5cb2310/fpsyg-08-01691-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac73/5625328/6c61d5cb2310/fpsyg-08-01691-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Ideal Standards, Acceptance, and Relationship Satisfaction: Latitudes of Differential Effects.理想标准、接纳与关系满意度:差异效应的范围
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 28;8:1691. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01691. eCollection 2017.
2
On the Association Between Mindfulness and Romantic Relationship Satisfaction: the Role of Partner Acceptance.正念与浪漫关系满意度之间的关联:伴侣接纳的作用。
Mindfulness (N Y). 2018;9(5):1543-1556. doi: 10.1007/s12671-018-0902-7. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
3
Regulation processes in intimate relationships: the role of ideal standards.亲密关系中的调节过程:理想标准的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Oct;91(4):662-85. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.662.
4
The Association Between Relationship Events and Experiences and Partner Evaluations: An Ideal Standards Perspective.关系事件与经历和伴侣评价之间的关联:一种理想标准视角
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 26;12:633267. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633267. eCollection 2021.
5
Couples coping with sensory loss: A dyadic study of the roles of self- and perceived partner acceptance.夫妻应对感官丧失:自我和感知伴侣接受的角色的对偶研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2018 Sep;23(3):646-664. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12309. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
6
Perceived Partner Responsiveness Mediates the Association Between Sexual and Marital Satisfaction: A Daily Diary Study in Newlywed Couples.感知到的伴侣反应性介导了性满意度与婚姻满意度之间的关联:一项针对新婚夫妇的日记研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Jan;45(1):109-20. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0448-2. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
7
Intimacy Mediates the Relation Between Maltreatment in Childhood and Sexual and Relationship Satisfaction in Adulthood: A Dyadic Longitudinal Analysis.亲密关系在童年期虐待与成年期性和关系满意度之间的中介作用:一项对偶纵向分析。
Arch Sex Behav. 2019 Apr;48(3):803-814. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1309-1. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
8
When and why do ideal partner preferences affect the process of initiating and maintaining romantic relationships?何时以及为何理想伴侣偏好会影响开始和维持浪漫关系的过程?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Nov;101(5):1012-32. doi: 10.1037/a0024062.
9
Objectification in Virtual Romantic Contexts: Perceived Discrepancies between Self and Partner Ideals Differentially affect Body Consciousness in Women and Men.虚拟浪漫情境中的客体化:自我与伴侣理想形象之间的感知差异对女性和男性身体意识的影响不同。
Sex Roles. 2015 Nov 1;73(9):442-452. doi: 10.1007/s11199-015-0533-6. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
10
Relationships between body image, sexual satisfaction, and relationship quality in romantic couples.浪漫伴侣中的体像、性满足与关系质量之间的关系。
J Fam Psychol. 2018 Jun;32(4):466-474. doi: 10.1037/fam0000407. Epub 2018 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The Link Between Mate Value Discrepancy and Relationship Satisfaction-An Empirical Examination Using Response Surface Analysis.配偶价值差异与关系满意度之间的联系——使用响应面分析的实证检验
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 20;15(8):1131. doi: 10.3390/bs15081131.
2
The Association Between Relationship Events and Experiences and Partner Evaluations: An Ideal Standards Perspective.关系事件与经历和伴侣评价之间的关联:一种理想标准视角
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 26;12:633267. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633267. eCollection 2021.
3
Polar Similars: Using Massive Mobile Dating Data to Predict Synchronization and Similarity in Dating Preferences.

本文引用的文献

1
Bridging the Sciences of Mindfulness and Romantic Relationships.弥合正念科学与浪漫关系科学。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2017 Feb;21(1):29-49. doi: 10.1177/1088868315615450. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
2
Predicting romantic interest and decisions in the very early stages of mate selection: standards, accuracy, and sex differences.预测择偶早期阶段的浪漫兴趣和决策:标准、准确性及性别差异。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Apr;40(4):540-50. doi: 10.1177/0146167213519481. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
3
Closeness discrepancies in romantic relationships: implications for relational well-being, stability, and mental health.
极地相似性:利用海量移动约会数据预测约会偏好中的同步性和相似性
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 6;10:2010. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02010. eCollection 2019.
4
Actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on global and experienced well-being.个性对整体幸福感和体验幸福感的行为者、伴侣及相似性效应。
J Res Pers. 2019 Feb;78:249-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
5
Longitudinal actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on well-being.人格对幸福感的纵向主体间、伴侣间和相似性效应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Oct;117(4):e51-e70. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000211. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
亲密关系中的距离差异:对关系幸福感、稳定性和心理健康的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Apr;39(4):456-69. doi: 10.1177/0146167213476896. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
4
Partner discrepancies and age differences in marital quality: distinguishing the ideal, expected, and perceived partner.伴侣差异和婚姻质量中的年龄差异:区分理想伴侣、期望伴侣和感知伴侣。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012 Jul;67(4):417-22. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr119. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
5
Deep Rationality: The Evolutionary Economics of Decision Making.深度理性:决策的演化经济学
Soc Cogn. 2009 Oct 1;27(5):764-785. doi: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.5.764.
6
Through the eyes of love: reality and illusion in intimate relationships.透过爱的视角:亲密关系中的现实与幻象。
Psychol Bull. 2010 Jul;136(4):627-58. doi: 10.1037/a0019792.
7
Living together apart: perceived concealment as a signal of exclusion in marital relationships.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Oct;35(10):1410-22. doi: 10.1177/0146167209339629. Epub 2009 Jul 6.
8
If I'm not hot, are you hot or not? Physical attractiveness evaluations and dating preferences as a function of one's own attractiveness.如果我不觉得热,你觉得热还是不热?作为自身吸引力函数的外貌吸引力评估与约会偏好。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Jul;19(7):669-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02141.x.
9
Self-expansion as a mediator of relationship improvements in a mindfulness intervention.自我扩展作为正念干预中人际关系改善的一个中介因素。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2007 Oct;33(4):517-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00035.x.
10
Women's sexual working models: an evolutionary-attachment perspective.
J Sex Res. 2006 Nov;43(4):328-42. doi: 10.1080/00224490609552332.