Andreani Lorenzo, Bonicoli Enrico, Parchi Paolo, Piolanti Nicola, Michele Lisanti
Orthopedics and Tramatology I Department, University of Pisa, via Paradisa 2, 56121, Pisa, Italy,
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Feb;24(2):237-42. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1186-1. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
Acromio-clavicular joint (ACJ) injuries represent nearly half of all athletic shoulder injuries. Stability of this joint depends on the integrity of the acromio-clavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments. Although the traumatic acromioclavicular joint separation is a well-known topic, there are different classifications, diagnostic procedures, concepts of intervention, and a great variety of implants. In this paper, we present an overview of the recent literature about this issue and the results of a retrospective non-randomized study with 2 different techniques. At the first Orthopedic Department of University of Pisa, a retrospective study was performed starting from January 2007 to February 2011 in our electronic database. We selected patient treated with two different techniques (tight-rope(®) system and hook plate) by the same senior surgeon with experience in shoulder surgery. The mean Costant score was 90 for the tight-rope(®) system group and 75 for the hook plate group. At the final follow-up, most of the patients had returned to their preinjury level of activity. Two patients had a breakage of the fixating system. The above-mentioned techniques provided satisfactory results with no loss of reduction except in two cases. The use of the hook plate is useful in fracture-dislocation of ACJ, but this requires another surgery to remove it. On the contrary, the use of the tight-rope(®) system does not require a new surgery or use of expensive synthetic graft or a graft harvested from a distant donor site.
肩锁关节(ACJ)损伤占所有运动性肩部损伤的近一半。该关节的稳定性取决于肩锁韧带和喙锁韧带的完整性。尽管创伤性肩锁关节分离是一个广为人知的话题,但存在不同的分类、诊断方法、干预理念以及各种各样的植入物。在本文中,我们概述了有关此问题的最新文献以及一项采用两种不同技术的回顾性非随机研究的结果。在比萨大学第一骨科,从2007年1月至2011年2月在我们的电子数据库中进行了一项回顾性研究。我们选择了由同一位具有肩部手术经验的资深外科医生采用两种不同技术(拉紧带(®)系统和钩钢板)治疗的患者。拉紧带(®)系统组的平均Constant评分是90分,钩钢板组是75分。在最终随访时,大多数患者已恢复到受伤前的活动水平。两名患者出现固定系统断裂。除两例外,上述技术均取得了满意的结果,且无复位丢失情况。钩钢板在肩锁关节骨折脱位中有用,但这需要再次手术取出。相反,拉紧带(®)系统的使用不需要再次手术,也不需要使用昂贵的合成移植物或从远处供体部位获取的移植物。