Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt Center for Neuroscience Drug Discovery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2013;115:1-59. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394587-7.00001-4.
In recent years, allosteric modulation of 7 transmembrane spanning receptors (7TMRs) has become a highly productive and exciting field of receptor pharmacology and drug discovery efforts. Positive and negative allosteric modulators (PAMs and NAMs, respectively) present a number of pharmacological and therapeutic advantages over conventional orthosteric ligands, including improved receptor-subtype selectivity, a lower propensity to induce receptor desensitization, the preservation of endogenous temporal and spatial activation of receptors, greater chemical flexibility for optimization of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetic parameters, and saturability of effect at target receptors, thus improving safety concerns and risk of overdose. Additionally, the relatively new concept of allosteric modulator-mediated receptor signal bias opens up a number of intriguing possibilities for PAMs, NAMs, and allosteric agonists, including the potential to selectively activate therapeutically beneficial signaling cascades, which could yield a superior tissue selectivity and side effect profile of allosteric modulators. However, there are a number of considerations and caveats that must be addressed when screening for and characterizing the properties of 7TMR allosteric modulators. Mode of pharmacology, methodology used to monitor receptor activity, detection of appropriate downstream analytes, selection of orthosteric probe, and assay time-course must all be considered when implementing any high-throughput screening campaign or when characterizing the properties of active compounds. Yet compared to conventional agonist/antagonist drug discovery programs, these elements of assay design are often a great deal more complicated when working with 7TMRs allosteric modulators. Moreover, for classical pharmacological methodologies and analyses, like radioligand binding and the assessment of compound affinity, the properties of allosteric modulators yield data that are more nuanced than orthosteric ligand-receptor interactions. In this review, we discuss the current methodologies being used to identify and characterize allosteric modulators, lending insight into the approaches that have been most successful in accurately and robustly identifying hit compounds. New label-free technologies capable of detecting phenotypic cellular changes in response to receptor activation are powerful tools well suited for assessing subtle or potentially masked cellular responses to allosteric modulation of 7TMRs. Allosteric modulator-induced receptor signal bias and the assay systems available to probe the various downstream signaling outcomes of receptor activation are also discussed.
近年来,7 跨膜受体(7TMRs)的变构调节已成为受体药理学和药物发现工作中一个极具成效和令人兴奋的领域。正变构调节剂(PAMs)和负变构调节剂(NAMs)相对于传统的变构配体具有许多药理学和治疗学优势,包括提高受体亚型选择性、降低受体脱敏诱导倾向、保留受体的内源性时空激活、优化药物代谢和药代动力学参数的更大化学灵活性,以及在靶受体上的效应饱和性,从而提高安全性问题和过量风险。此外,变构调节剂介导的受体信号偏倚的相对较新概念为 PAMs、NAMs 和变构激动剂开辟了许多有趣的可能性,包括选择性激活治疗有益信号级联的潜力,这可能产生变构调节剂的卓越组织选择性和副作用特征。然而,在筛选和表征 7TMR 变构调节剂的特性时,必须考虑和注意一些因素。在实施任何高通量筛选活动或表征活性化合物的特性时,必须考虑药理学模式、用于监测受体活性的方法学、适当的下游分析物的检测、变构探针的选择和测定时间进程。然而,与传统的激动剂/拮抗剂药物发现方案相比,在使用 7TMR 变构调节剂时,这些测定设计要素通常要复杂得多。此外,对于经典的药理学方法学和分析,如放射性配体结合和化合物亲和力评估,变构调节剂的特性产生的数据比变构配体-受体相互作用更为复杂。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了目前用于识别和表征变构调节剂的方法学,深入了解了最成功的准确和稳健识别命中化合物的方法。能够检测受体激活引起的表型细胞变化的新型无标记技术是评估 7TMR 变构调节对细胞反应的细微或潜在掩盖的强大工具。还讨论了变构调节剂诱导的受体信号偏倚以及可用于探测受体激活的各种下游信号转导结果的测定系统。