• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

损伤严重程度的一种新表征。

A new characterization of injury severity.

作者信息

Champion H R, Copes W S, Sacco W J, Lawnick M M, Bain L W, Gann D S, Gennarelli T, Mackenzie E, Schwaitzberg S

机构信息

Washington Hospital Center, DC 20010.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1990 May;30(5):539-45; discussion 545-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199005000-00003.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-199005000-00003
PMID:2342136
Abstract

ASCOT (A Severity Characterization of Trauma) is a physiologic and anatomic characterization of injury severity which combines emergency department admission values of Glasgow Coma Scale, systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, patient age, and AIS-85 anatomic injury scores in a way that obviates ISS shortcomings. ASCOT values are related to survival probability using the logistic function and regression weights reaffirm the importance of head injury and coma to the prediction of patient outcome. The ability of TRISS and ASCOT to discriminate survivors from non-survivors and the reliability of their predictions, as measured by the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic, were compared using Major Trauma Outcome Study (MTOS) patient data. ASCOT performance matched or exceeded TRISS's for blunt-injured patients and for penetrating-injured patients. ASCOT performance gains were modest for blunt-injured patients. The Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics suggest that ASCOT reliably predicts patient outcome for penetrating-injured patients and nearly so for blunt-injured patients. Statistically reliable predictions were not achieved by TRISS for either set. ASCOT provides a more precise description of patient physiologic status and injury number, location, and severity than TRISS. The ASCOT patient description may be useful in relating to other important outcomes not highly correlated with TRISS or the Injury Severity Score (ISS) such as disability, length of stay, and resources required for treatment.

摘要

ASCOT(创伤严重程度特征化)是一种损伤严重程度的生理和解剖学特征化方法,它将格拉斯哥昏迷量表、收缩压、呼吸频率、患者年龄的急诊科入院值以及AIS - 85解剖损伤评分以一种避免损伤严重度评分(ISS)缺点的方式结合起来。ASCOT值通过逻辑函数与生存概率相关,回归权重再次证实了头部损伤和昏迷对患者预后预测的重要性。使用重大创伤结局研究(MTOS)患者数据,比较了TRISS和ASCOT区分幸存者与非幸存者的能力及其预测的可靠性(通过Hosmer - Lemeshow统计量衡量)。对于钝器伤患者和穿透伤患者,ASCOT的表现与TRISS相当或更优。对于钝器伤患者,ASCOT的表现提升幅度较小。Hosmer - Lemeshow统计量表明,ASCOT能可靠地预测穿透伤患者的预后,对钝器伤患者几乎也能如此。对于这两组患者,TRISS均未实现统计学上可靠的预测。与TRISS相比,ASCOT能更精确地描述患者的生理状态以及损伤的数量、位置和严重程度。ASCOT对患者的描述可能有助于关联到其他与TRISS或损伤严重度评分(ISS)相关性不高的重要结局,如残疾、住院时间和治疗所需资源。

相似文献

1
A new characterization of injury severity.损伤严重程度的一种新表征。
J Trauma. 1990 May;30(5):539-45; discussion 545-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199005000-00003.
2
Improved predictions from a severity characterization of trauma (ASCOT) over Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): results of an independent evaluation.创伤严重程度特征化评分(ASCOT)相较于创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)的预测改进:一项独立评估结果
J Trauma. 1996 Jan;40(1):42-8; discussion 48-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199601000-00009.
3
Validity of applying TRISS analysis to paediatric blunt trauma patients managed in a French paediatric level I trauma centre.将TRISS分析应用于法国一级儿科创伤中心治疗的小儿钝性创伤患者的有效性。
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Apr;27(4):743-50. doi: 10.1007/s001340100905.
4
A simple mathematical modification of TRISS markedly improves calibration.对TRISS进行简单的数学修正可显著改善校准。
J Trauma. 2002 Oct;53(4):630-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200210000-00002.
5
Comparison of current injury scales for survival chance estimation: an evaluation comparing the predictive performance of the ISS, NISS, and AP scores in a Dutch local trauma registration.用于生存机会估计的当前损伤评分系统比较:一项在荷兰地方创伤登记中比较损伤严重度评分(ISS)、新损伤严重度评分(NISS)和简明损伤定级(AP)评分预测性能的评估
J Trauma. 2005 Mar;58(3):596-604. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000152551.39400.6f.
6
A new "TRISS-like" probability of survival model for intubated trauma patients.一种用于气管插管创伤患者的新型“类TRISS”生存概率模型。
J Trauma. 2003 Jul;55(1):53-61. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000075340.22097.B5.
7
Comparison between TRISS and ASCOT methods in controlling for injury severity.创伤严重度评分(TRISS)法与创伤严重度特征评分(ASCOT)法在控制损伤严重程度方面的比较。
J Trauma. 1992 Aug;33(2):326-32. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199208000-00025.
8
Employment of trauma and injury severity score and a severity characterization of trauma in the outcome evaluation of trauma care and their research advances.创伤和损伤严重度评分在创伤救治结局评估中的应用及创伤严重度特征分析与研究进展
Chin Med J (Engl). 1998 Feb;111(2):169-73.
9
Validation of TRISS and ASCOT using a non-MTOS trauma registry.使用非MTOS创伤登记系统对TRISS和ASCOT进行验证。
J Trauma. 1995 Jan;38(1):83-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199501000-00022.
10
An evaluation of Ontario trauma outcomes and the development of regional norms for Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) analysis.安大略省创伤结果评估及创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)分析的区域标准制定。
J Trauma. 1996 Oct;41(4):731-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199610000-00023.

引用本文的文献

1
Injury Severity Scoring in the Resuscitation Room-Is Preliminary Injury Severity Score Accurate?复苏室中的损伤严重程度评分——初始损伤严重程度评分准确吗?
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Jul;69(6):e70076. doi: 10.1111/aas.70076.
2
Nationwide Evaluation of the Validity of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score Method in Korean Regional Trauma Centers Using Multi-Institutional Large-Scale Data.全国范围内使用多机构大规模数据评估创伤和损伤严重程度评分方法在韩国地区创伤中心的有效性。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Oct 28;39(41):e288. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e288.
3
Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score for Predicting Mortality among Older Korean Adults with Trauma: Is It Applicable in All Cases?
预测韩国老年创伤患者死亡率的老年创伤结局评分:它适用于所有情况吗?
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2024 Dec;28(4):484-490. doi: 10.4235/agmr.24.0095. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
4
The role of big data management, data registries, and machine learning algorithms for optimizing safe definitive surgery in trauma: a review.大数据管理、数据登记和机器学习算法在优化创伤确定性安全手术中的作用:综述
Patient Saf Surg. 2024 Jun 20;18(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13037-024-00404-0.
5
Does the Probability of Survival Calculated by the Trauma and Injury Severity Score Method Accurately Reflect the Severity of Neurotrauma Patients Admitted to Regional Trauma Centers in Korea?创伤和损伤严重度评分法计算的生存率是否能准确反映韩国地区创伤中心收治的神经创伤患者的严重程度?
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Aug 28;38(34):e265. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e265.
6
Validation of the Pediatric Resuscitation and Trauma Outcome (PRESTO) model in injury patients in Tanzania.验证坦桑尼亚创伤患儿复苏和创伤结局(PRESTO)模型。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 5;13(4):e070747. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070747.
7
Model for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality of Physical Trauma Patients Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques: Nationwide Population-Based Study in Korea.利用人工智能技术预测物理创伤患者住院死亡率的模型:韩国全国人群研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 13;24(12):e43757. doi: 10.2196/43757.
8
Assessing the impact of the national traffic safety campaign: a nationwide cohort study in Japan.评估全国交通安全运动的影响:日本全国队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):e054295. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054295.
9
Predicting Mortality of Korean Geriatric Trauma Patients: A Comparison between Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score and Trauma and Injury Severity Score.预测韩国老年创伤患者的死亡率:老年创伤结局评分与创伤和损伤严重程度评分的比较。
Yonsei Med J. 2022 Jan;63(1):88-94. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.1.88.
10
Artificial intelligence to predict in-hospital mortality using novel anatomical injury score.利用新型解剖损伤评分预测院内死亡率的人工智能。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 7;11(1):23534. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03024-1.