Greenfield B H, Donatelli R, Wooden M J, Wilkes J
Physical Therapy Associates of Metro Atlanta, Jonesboro, GA 30369.
Am J Sports Med. 1990 Mar-Apr;18(2):124-8. doi: 10.1177/036354659001800202.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether shoulder rotational strength was greater in the plane of the scapula or the frontal plane. Isokinetic shoulder rotational strength was evaluated in 20 subjects. Using the Merac (Universal Gym Equipment, Inc., Cedar Rapids, IA), test data was gathered in the right shoulders, in 45 degrees abduction, at a speed of 60 deg/sec, in the plane of the scapula and the frontal plane. Each subject returned within 1 week for retests to establish reliability. The average correlational coefficient across tests was 0.87. The Merac computer system was used to analyze data. Mean and standard deviations for peak torque to body weight were calculated. A paired t-test was used to examine the difference in the means for internal and external rotation between the two positions. The results indicated no significant difference between the two positions for shoulder internal rotational strength values. However, shoulder external rotational strength values in the plane of the scapula were statistically significantly higher than in the frontal plane (P less than 0.001). These preliminary results suggest isokinetic strength training and testing may be preferable in the plane of the scapula rather than the frontal plane.
本研究的目的是确定肩胛骨平面或额状面的肩部旋转力量是否更强。对20名受试者的等速肩部旋转力量进行了评估。使用Merac(爱荷华州锡达拉皮兹市通用健身器材公司),在右肩外展45度、速度为60度/秒的情况下,于肩胛骨平面和额状面收集测试数据。每位受试者在1周内返回进行重新测试以确定可靠性。各测试之间的平均相关系数为0.87。使用Merac计算机系统分析数据。计算了峰值扭矩与体重的均值和标准差。采用配对t检验来检验两个位置之间内旋和外旋均值的差异。结果表明,两个位置的肩部内旋力量值无显著差异。然而,肩胛骨平面的肩部外旋力量值在统计学上显著高于额状面(P小于0.001)。这些初步结果表明,等速力量训练和测试在肩胛骨平面可能比在额状面更可取。