CHU Rennes Service de Chirurgie Hépatobiliaire et Digestive, 35033, Rennes, France.
World J Surg. 2013 Jun;37(6):1297-302. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1967-z.
Surgery is the only validated means of treating overt rectal prolapses, but both patients and physicians may decline or postpone the surgical approach. However, little is known on the functional outcome of nonoperated rectal prolapse. The aim of the present study was to highlight the natural history of overt rectal prolapse in patients for whom surgery was avoided or delayed.
A total of 206 patients complaining of full-thickness rectal prolapse were referred to a single institution that provided anorectal physiology for functional anorectal disorders. Standardized questionnaires, anorectal manometry, endosonography, and evacuation proctography constituted a prospective database. Fecal incontinence was evaluated with the Cleveland Clinic score (CCIS), and constipation was evaluated with the Knowles Eccersley Scott Symptom score (KESS).
Forty-two nonoperated patients (mean age: 61 ± 16 years) were compared to those of operated patients paired according to age and gender: the mean follow-up was 44 ± 26 months. The two groups had a similar past-history, follow-up, stool frequency, and main complaints, but lower quantified symptomatic scores and a better quality of life were reported in the nonsurgical group. At the end of follow-up, the nonsurgical group did not show any variation in CCI and KESS scores. By contrast, these two scores significantly improved in the rectopexy group. Sixteen nonoperated patients experienced a degradation of their continence status with an average increase of 5 ± 4.3 points of the CCIS. The patients with a CCIS <7 at referral were likely to deteriorate as compared to those having a higher score. Patients with a symptom history longer than 4 years never improved and in two-thirds continence deteriorated throughout the follow-up.
In the absence of the surgical option, patients with a 4-year duration of rectal prolapse and those with mild incontinence had no chance of improvement. These findings may be taken into account when surgery of rectal prolapse is not chosen.
手术是治疗显性直肠脱垂的唯一有效方法,但患者和医生可能会拒绝或推迟手术。然而,对于未接受手术的直肠脱垂患者的功能结局知之甚少。本研究旨在强调避免或延迟手术的显性直肠脱垂患者的自然病史。
共有 206 名抱怨全层直肠脱垂的患者被转诊至一家提供肛肠生理功能障碍的肛肠生理功能障碍的单一机构。标准化问卷、肛肠测压、内镜超声和排空直肠造影构成了一个前瞻性数据库。粪便失禁用克利夫兰诊所评分(CCIS)评估,便秘用 Knowles Eccersley Scott 症状评分(KESS)评估。
42 例未手术患者(平均年龄:61 ± 16 岁)与根据年龄和性别配对的手术患者进行比较:平均随访时间为 44 ± 26 个月。两组患者的既往病史、随访、排便频率和主要症状相似,但非手术组报告的症状评分较低,生活质量较好。随访结束时,非手术组的 CCIS 和 KESS 评分无变化。相比之下,直肠固定术组的这两个评分显著改善。16 例未手术患者的控便状态恶化,CCIS 平均增加 5 ± 4.3 分。就诊时 CCIS<7 的患者较评分较高的患者更有可能恶化。症状史超过 4 年的患者从未改善,三分之二的患者在整个随访过程中控便恶化。
在没有手术选择的情况下,直肠脱垂病程超过 4 年且有轻度失禁的患者没有改善的机会。在不选择直肠脱垂手术时,应考虑这些发现。