Suppr超能文献

经阴道电刺激联合表面肌电图生物反馈治疗绝经前女性压力性尿失禁:一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验

Transvaginal electrical stimulation with surface-EMG biofeedback in managing stress urinary incontinence in women of premenopausal age: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Terlikowski Robert, Dobrzycka Bozena, Kinalski Maciej, Kuryliszyn-Moskal Anna, Terlikowski Slawomir J

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Oct;24(10):1631-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2071-5. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of conservative treatment of urodynamic stress urinary incontinence (SUI) using transvaginal electrical stimulation with surface-electromyography-assisted biofeedback (TVES + sEMG) in women of premenopausal age.

METHODS

One hundred and two patients with SUI were divided into two groups: active (n = 68) and placebo (n = 34) TVES + sEMG. The treatment lasted for 8 weeks and consisted of two sessions per day. Women were evaluated before and after the intervention by pad test, voiding diary, urodynamic test, and the Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL).

RESULTS

Mean urinary leakage on a standard pad test at the end of 8th week was significantly lower in the active than the placebo group (19.5 ± 13.6 vs. 39.8 ± 28.5). Mean urinary leakage on a 24-h pad test was significantly reduced in the active group at the end of 8th and 16th weeks compared with the placebo group (8.2 ± 14.8 vs. 14.6 ± 18.9 and 6.1 ± 11.4 vs. 18.2 ± 20.8, respectively). There was also a significant improvement in muscle strength as measured by the Oxford scale in the active vs the placebo group after 8 and 16 weeks (4.2 vs 2.6 and 4.1 vs 2.7, respectively). No significant difference was found between groups in urodynamic data before and after treatment. At the end of 8th week, the mean I-QOL score in the active vs the placebo group was 78.2 ± 17.9 vs 55.9 ± 14.2, respectively, and at the end of 16th week 80.8 ± 24.1 vs. 50.6 ± 14.9, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that TVES + sEMG is a trustworthy method of treatment in premenopausal women with SUI; however, its reliability needs to be established.

摘要

引言与假设

本研究旨在评估经阴道电刺激联合表面肌电图辅助生物反馈(TVES + sEMG)对绝经前女性压力性尿失禁(SUI)进行保守治疗的效果。

方法

102例SUI患者被分为两组:主动治疗组(n = 68)和安慰剂组(n = 34),均采用TVES + sEMG治疗。治疗持续8周,每天进行两次治疗。在干预前后,通过护垫试验、排尿日记、尿动力学检查以及尿失禁生活质量问卷(I-QOL)对女性进行评估。

结果

第8周结束时,主动治疗组在标准护垫试验中的平均漏尿量显著低于安慰剂组(19.5±13.6对比39.8±28.5)。与安慰剂组相比,主动治疗组在第8周和第16周结束时24小时护垫试验的平均漏尿量显著减少(分别为8.2±14.8对比14.6±18.9以及6.1±11.4对比18.2±20.8)。在第8周和第16周后,主动治疗组与安慰剂组相比,通过牛津量表测量的肌肉力量也有显著改善(分别为4.2对比2.6以及4.1对比2.7)。治疗前后两组的尿动力学数据无显著差异。在第8周结束时,主动治疗组与安慰剂组的平均I-QOL评分分别为78.2±17.9和55.9±14.2,在第16周结束时分别为80.8±24.1和50.6±14.9。

结论

我们的研究表明,TVES + sEMG是治疗绝经前SUI女性的一种可靠方法;然而,其可靠性仍需确立。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aae7/3779318/54d3af7a2c95/192_2013_2071_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验