Suppr超能文献

培格非格司亭预防不同化疗相关发热性中性粒细胞减少风险水平患者:一项观察性研究。

Pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in patients at different levels of risk for chemotherapy-associated febrile neutropenia: an observational study.

机构信息

University Hospital, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 May;29(5):505-15. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.781018. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines for using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients receiving chemotherapies with 10-20% (intermediate) risk for febrile neutropenia (FN) recommend additional assessment of patient-related FN risk factors.

OBJECTIVE

The current study evaluated adherence to guideline recommendations and analysed modalities of pegfilgrastim use.

METHODS

Adult cancer patients scheduled to receive a chemotherapy regimen assessed by the investigators as intermediate FN risk and who received pegfilgrastim were prospectively enrolled in this observational study from 2007-2010. Risk factors at study entry, treatment modalities and FN assessment were documented by investigators, whereas guideline adherence was centrally checked in a post-hoc analysis, according to guideline categorizations.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven centres enrolled 335 evaluable patients with solid and hematologic neoplasias. Although physicians initially rated the FN risk of all chemotherapies as intermediate, after central re-assessment this applied only to 63.9% of regimens; 21.2% were reassessed as low risk and 14.9% as high risk. Pegfilgrastim was used as primary prophylaxis in 80.3% of all patients. The most frequent FN risk factors considered by physicians when deciding to use pegfilgrastim were female gender, advanced disease, age ≥ 65 years, and anaemia. FN incidence was higher in patients with ≥ 4 FN risk factors than those with <4 risk factors (10% vs. 4.3%; p = 0.055) and in patients with severe comorbidity than those without (13.6% vs. 4.5%; p = 0.014). Overall FN rate was 5.7%.

LIMITATIONS

Due to the observational design of the study, findings are descriptive in nature. Post-hoc assessment of chemotherapy FN risk was determined by author's opinion in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, there was good adherence of Austrian physicians to guideline recommendations; however, there are chemotherapy regimens and clinical settings in which FN risk assignment is unclear in the literature. FN incidence with pegfilgrastim prophylaxis was similar to that reported in other observational and randomized studies.

摘要

背景

对于接受发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)风险为 10-20%(中等)的化疗药物治疗的患者,使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的指南建议对患者相关 FN 风险因素进行额外评估。

目的

本研究评估了对指南建议的遵循情况,并分析了培非格司亭的使用方式。

方法

本前瞻性观察性研究于 2007 年至 2010 年期间纳入了计划接受研究者评估为中等 FN 风险的化疗药物治疗的成年癌症患者,并接受培非格司亭治疗。研究者记录了患者入组时的风险因素、治疗方式和 FN 评估情况,而指南遵循情况则根据指南分类在事后分析中由中心进行检查。

结果

37 个中心纳入了 335 名可评估的实体瘤和血液系统恶性肿瘤患者。尽管医生最初将所有化疗药物的 FN 风险均评定为中等,但经中心重新评估,仅有 63.9%的方案为中等风险,21.2%的方案被重新评定为低风险,14.9%的方案被评定为高风险。培非格司亭在所有患者中的使用率为 80.3%。当决定使用培非格司亭时,医生最常考虑的 FN 风险因素是女性、晚期疾病、年龄≥65 岁和贫血。FN 风险因素≥4 个的患者与风险因素<4 个的患者相比(10%比 4.3%;p=0.055),以及与无严重合并症的患者相比(13.6%比 4.5%;p=0.014),FN 发生率更高。总体 FN 发生率为 5.7%。

局限性

由于研究采用观察性设计,因此研究结果具有描述性。在某些情况下,化疗药物 FN 风险的事后评估由作者的意见确定。

结论

总体而言,奥地利医生对指南建议的遵循情况良好;然而,在某些情况下,文献中对某些化疗方案和临床情况的 FN 风险评估并不明确。使用培非格司亭预防 FN 的发生率与其他观察性和随机研究报告的发生率相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验