Suppr超能文献

挥鞭样损伤相关疾病的应对与康复:早期使用被动应对策略与颈部疼痛及疼痛相关残疾的康复较慢有关。

Coping and recovery in whiplash-associated disorders: early use of passive coping strategies is associated with slower recovery of neck pain and pain-related disability.

作者信息

Carroll Linda J, Ferrari Robert, Cassidy J David, Côté Pierre

机构信息

*Department of Public Health Sciences, Alberta Centre for Injury Prevention and Research Departments of †Medicine ‡Rheumatic Diseases, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB ∥Division of Outcomes and Population Health, Toronto Western Research Institute ¶Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto #Faculty of Health Sciences and UOIT-CMCC Centre for the Study of Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), Toronto, ON, Canada §Institute of Sport Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Faculty of Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2014 Jan;30(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182869d50.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Coping is shown to affect outcomes in chronic pain patients; however, few studies have examined the role of coping in the course of recovery in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD). The purpose of this study was to determine the predictive value of coping style for 2 key aspects of WAD recovery, reductions in neck pain, and in disability.

METHODS

A population-based prospective cohort study design was used to study 2986 adults with traffic-related WAD. Participants were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 4, 8, and 12 months postinjury. Coping was measured at 6 weeks using the Pain Management Inventory, and neck pain recovery was assessed at each subsequent follow-up, using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Disability was assessed at each follow-up using the Pain Disability Index (PDI). Pain recovery was defined as a VAS score of 0 to 10; disability recovery was defined as a PDI score of 0 to 4. Data analysis used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Those using high versus low levels of passive coping at 6 weeks postinjury experienced 28% slower pain recovery and 43% slower disability recovery. Adjusted hazard rate ratios for pain recovery and disability recovery were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.59-0.88) and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.41-0.78), respectively. Active coping was not associated with recovery of neck pain or disability.

CONCLUSIONS

Passive coping style predicts neck pain and self-assessed disability recovery. It may be beneficial to assess and improve coping style early in WAD.

摘要

目的

应对方式已被证明会影响慢性疼痛患者的预后;然而,很少有研究探讨应对方式在挥鞭样损伤相关疾病(WAD)恢复过程中的作用。本研究的目的是确定应对方式对WAD恢复的两个关键方面,即颈部疼痛减轻和功能障碍减轻的预测价值。

方法

采用基于人群的前瞻性队列研究设计,对2986名患有与交通相关的WAD的成年人进行研究。在基线、伤后6周以及伤后4、8和12个月对参与者进行评估。在6周时使用疼痛管理量表测量应对方式,在随后的每次随访中使用100毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估颈部疼痛恢复情况。在每次随访时使用疼痛功能障碍指数(PDI)评估功能障碍情况。疼痛恢复定义为VAS评分为0至10;功能障碍恢复定义为PDI评分为0至4。数据分析使用多变量Cox比例风险模型。

结果

在伤后6周,采用高水平与低水平被动应对方式的患者,疼痛恢复速度慢28%,功能障碍恢复速度慢43%。疼痛恢复和功能障碍恢复的调整后风险比分别为0.72(95%CI,0.59 - 0.88)和0.57(95%CI,0.41 - 0.78)。积极应对与颈部疼痛或功能障碍的恢复无关。

结论

被动应对方式可预测颈部疼痛和自我评估的功能障碍恢复情况。在WAD早期评估和改善应对方式可能有益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验