• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机对照试验的临床研究报告:先前保密的行业报告的探索性综述。

Clinical study reports of randomised controlled trials: an exploratory review of previously confidential industry reports.

机构信息

Divisions of General Pediatrics and General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2013 Feb 26;3(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002496. Print 2013.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002496
PMID:23447465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3586134/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the structure and content of a non-random sample of clinical study reports (CSRs) to guide clinicians and systematic reviewers.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched public sources and lodged Freedom of Information requests for previously confidential CSRs primarily written by the industry for regulators.

SELECTION CRITERIA

CSRs reporting sufficient information for extraction ('adequate').

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Presence and length of essential elements of trial design and reporting and compression factor (ratio of page length for CSRs compared to its published counterpart in a scientific journal).

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted on standard forms and crosschecked for accuracy.

RESULTS

We assembled a population of 78 CSRs (covering 90 randomised controlled trials; 144 610 pages total) dated 1991-2011 of 14 pharmaceuticals. Report synopses had a median length of 5 pages, efficacy evaluation 13.5 pages, safety evaluation 17 pages, attached tables 337 pages, trial protocol 62 pages, statistical analysis plan 15 pages and individual efficacy and safety listings had a median length of 447 and 109.5 pages, respectively. While 16 (21%) of CSRs contained completed case report forms, these were accessible to us in only one case (765 pages representing 16 individuals). Compression factors ranged between 1 and 8805.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical study reports represent a hitherto mostly hidden and untapped source of detailed and exhaustive data on each trial. They should be consulted by independent parties interested in a detailed record of a clinical trial, and should form the basic unit for evidence synthesis as their use is likely to minimise the problem of reporting bias. We cannot say whether our sample is representative and whether our conclusions are generalisable to an undefined and undefinable population of CSRs.

摘要

目的

探索临床研究报告(CSR)的结构和内容,为临床医生和系统评价者提供指导。

检索策略

我们检索了公共资源,并根据信息自由请求,获取了主要由行业为监管机构编写的先前保密的 CSR。

选择标准

报告有足够信息可供提取的 CSR(“充分”)。

主要结果测量

试验设计和报告的基本要素的存在和长度以及压缩因子(CSR 的页面长度与在科学期刊上发表的对应物的比值)。

数据提取

数据以标准表格提取,并进行准确性交叉检查。

结果

我们汇集了 78 份 CSR(涵盖 90 项随机对照试验;总共有 144610 页),涉及 14 种药物,日期为 1991 年至 2011 年。报告摘要的中位数长度为 5 页,疗效评估为 13.5 页,安全性评估为 17 页,附加表格为 337 页,试验方案为 62 页,统计分析计划为 15 页,个别疗效和安全性列表的中位数长度分别为 447 页和 109.5 页。尽管有 16 份(21%)CSR 包含完整的病例报告表,但我们仅在一个案例中获得了这些表(代表 16 个人的 765 页)。压缩因子范围在 1 到 8805 之间。

结论

临床研究报告代表了迄今为止隐藏和未被充分利用的详细和详尽数据来源,每个试验。对临床试验详细记录感兴趣的独立方应查阅这些报告,并且应该作为证据综合的基本单位,因为它们的使用可能会最小化报告偏倚的问题。我们不能说我们的样本是否具有代表性,我们的结论是否可以推广到未定义和不可定义的 CSR 人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/3586134/2ee9ab32c029/bmjopen2012002496f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/3586134/b403121bfb90/bmjopen2012002496f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/3586134/2ee9ab32c029/bmjopen2012002496f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/3586134/b403121bfb90/bmjopen2012002496f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/3586134/2ee9ab32c029/bmjopen2012002496f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical study reports of randomised controlled trials: an exploratory review of previously confidential industry reports.随机对照试验的临床研究报告:先前保密的行业报告的探索性综述。
BMJ Open. 2013 Feb 26;3(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002496. Print 2013.
2
Reporting of harms in oncological clinical study reports submitted to the European Medicines Agency compared to trial registries and publications-a methodological review.向欧洲药品管理局提交的肿瘤临床研究报告中危害报告与试验登记处和出版物的比较——方法学综述。
BMC Med. 2021 Apr 8;19(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-01955-0.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Completeness of reporting of patient-relevant clinical trial outcomes: comparison of unpublished clinical study reports with publicly available data.患者相关临床试验结局报告的完整性:未发表的临床研究报告与公开数据的比较。
PLoS Med. 2013 Oct;10(10):e1001526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001526. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
5
European Medicines Agency Policy 0070: an exploratory review of data utility in clinical study reports for academic research.欧洲药品管理局政策 0070:学术研究中临床研究报告数据实用性的探索性评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Nov 5;19(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0836-3.
6
The use of clinical study reports to enhance the quality of systematic reviews: a survey of systematic review authors.使用临床研究报告提高系统评价质量:系统评价作者的调查。
Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 8;7(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0766-x.
7
Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.安抚奶嘴使用与母乳喂养、婴儿猝死综合征、感染及牙列不齐之间的关联。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2005;3(6):1-33. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200503060-00001.
8
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
9
Diclofenac Potassium in Acute Postoperative Pain and Dysmenorrhoea: Results from Comprehensive Clinical Trial Reports.双氯芬酸钾用于术后急性疼痛和痛经:综合临床试验报告结果
Pain Res Manag. 2018 Jan 17;2018:9493413. doi: 10.1155/2018/9493413. eCollection 2018.
10
Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.安抚奶嘴的使用与母乳喂养、婴儿猝死综合征、感染和牙齿咬合不正的关系。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2005 Jul;3(6):147-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-6988.2005.00024.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Study Reports-a systematic review with thematic synthesis: Part 1. History, contents and structure, definitions, and terminology.临床研究报告——一项采用主题综合法的系统评价:第1部分。历史、内容与结构、定义及术语
Trials. 2025 Apr 29;26(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08710-9.
2
Implementation of the EU's Health Technology Assessment regulation: where does existing methods guidance require concretization and what are the relevant methodological options?欧盟卫生技术评估法规的实施:现有方法指南在哪些方面需要具体化,相关的方法选项有哪些?
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Feb 6;41(1):e9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324004793.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The first 2 years of the European Medicines Agency's policy on access to documents: secret no longer.欧洲药品管理局文件获取政策的头两年:不再保密。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Mar 11;173(5):380-2. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3838.
2
Clinical trial data as a public good.作为公共产品的临床试验数据。
JAMA. 2012 Sep 5;308(9):871-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.9661.
3
Open clinical trial data for all? A view from regulators.公开所有临床试验数据?监管者的观点。
How to use the regulatory data from Health Canada for secondary analyses on new drugs, biologics and vaccines.
如何利用加拿大卫生部的监管数据对新药、生物制品和疫苗进行二次分析。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):187-193. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112475.
4
A 10-year update to the principles for clinical trial data sharing by pharmaceutical companies: perspectives based on a decade of literature and policies.制药公司临床试验数据共享原则的 10 年更新:基于十年文献和政策的观点。
BMC Med. 2023 Oct 23;21(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03113-0.
5
Clinical Trial Data Transparency in the EU: Is the New Clinical Trials Regulation a Game-Changer?欧盟临床试验数据透明度:新的临床试验法规会带来变革吗?
IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law. 2023;54(5):732-763. doi: 10.1007/s40319-023-01329-4. Epub 2023 May 4.
6
Clinical study reports published by the European Medicines Agency 2016-2018: a cross-sectional analysis.2016-2018 年欧洲药品管理局发布的临床研究报告:一项横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 15;13(5):e068981. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068981.
7
Restoring invisible and abandoned trials of gabapentin for neuropathic pain: a clinical and methodological investigation.重新评估加巴喷丁治疗神经病理性疼痛的未发表和被遗弃试验:一项临床和方法学调查。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 30;11(6):e047785. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047785.
8
Sponsorship bias in clinical trials: growing menace or dawning realisation?临床试验中的赞助偏差:日益严重的威胁还是初现的认识?
J R Soc Med. 2020 Apr;113(4):148-157. doi: 10.1177/0141076820914242.
9
Adjuvant-containing control arms in pivotal quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine trials: restoration of previously unpublished methodology.关键性四价人乳头瘤病毒疫苗试验中含佐剂的对照组:恢复先前未发表的方法。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2020 Dec;25(6):213-219. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111331. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
10
Benefits and harms of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines: comparison of trial data from clinical study reports with corresponding trial register entries and journal publications.人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗的获益与危害:临床试验报告中的临床试验数据与相应的临床试验注册条目和期刊出版物的比较。
Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 28;9(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01300-1.
PLoS Med. 2012;9(4):e1001202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001202. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
4
The imperative to share clinical study reports: recommendations from the Tamiflu experience.分享临床研究报告的必要性:来自达菲经验的建议。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(4):e1001201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001201. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
5
The health-related quality of life was not improved by targeting higher hemoglobin in the Normal Hematocrit Trial.在正常红细胞压积试验中,针对更高的血红蛋白水平并没有改善与健康相关的生活质量。
Kidney Int. 2012 Jul;82(2):235-41. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.76. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
6
Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults and children.用于预防和治疗健康成人及儿童流感的神经氨酸酶抑制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1:CD008965. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008965.pub3.
7
Rethinking credible evidence synthesis.重新思考可靠的证据综合分析。
BMJ. 2012 Jan 17;344:d7898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7898.
8
Out of sight but not out of mind: how to search for unpublished clinical trial evidence.虽未露面,但未被遗忘:如何搜索未发表的临床试验证据。
BMJ. 2012 Jan 3;344:d8013. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d8013.
9
Impact of document type on reporting quality of clinical drug trials: a comparison of registry reports, clinical study reports, and journal publications.文件类型对临床药物试验报告质量的影响:注册报告、临床研究报告和期刊出版物的比较。
BMJ. 2012 Jan 3;344:d8141. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d8141.
10
Why we need easy access to all data from all clinical trials and how to accomplish it.为什么我们需要方便地获取所有临床试验的数据,以及如何实现这一目标。
Trials. 2011 Nov 23;12:249. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-249.