J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Dec;114(12):1943-53.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.06.353. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
Food insecurity acts as a chronic stressor independent of poverty. Food-insecure adults may consume more highly palatable foods as a coping mechanism, leading to poorer diet quality and increased risks of chronic disease over time. Using data from the 1999-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, this study aimed to examine the cross-sectional differences in dietary intake and diet quality by household food security among 8,129 lower-income adults (≤300% of the federal poverty level). Food insecurity was assessed using the 18-item US Household Food Security Survey Module. Dietary intake was assessed from 24-hour recalls and diet quality was measured using the Healthy Eating Index-2005 and the Alternate Healthy Eating Index-2010. Relative mean differences in dietary outcomes by household food security were estimated using linear regression models, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics. Lower-income food-insecure adults reported higher consumption of some highly palatable foods, including high-fat dairy products (P trend<0.0001) and salty snacks (P trend=0.01) compared with lower-income food-secure adults. Food insecurity was also associated with more sugar-sweetened beverages (P trend=0.003); more red/processed meat (P trend=0.005); more nuts, seeds, and legumes (P trend=0.0006); fewer vegetables (P trend<0.0001); and fewer sweets and bakery desserts (P trend=0.0002). No differences were observed for intakes of total energy and macronutrients. Food insecurity was significantly associated with lower Healthy Eating Index-2005 (P trend<0.0001) and Alternate Healthy Eating Index-2010 scores (P trend<0.0001). Despite no macronutrient differences, food insecurity was associated with characteristics of poor diet quality known to increase chronic disease risk.
食物不安全是一种独立于贫困的慢性压力源。为了应对压力,食物不安全的成年人可能会更多地食用美味可口的食物,从而导致饮食质量较差,随着时间的推移,慢性病的风险增加。本研究利用 1999-2008 年全国健康和营养调查的数据,旨在研究在较低收入成年人(≤联邦贫困线的 300%)中,家庭食物保障状况不同的情况下,膳食摄入量和饮食质量的横断面差异。使用美国家庭食物安全调查模块的 18 项调查来评估食物不安全情况。通过 24 小时回顾法评估膳食摄入量,使用健康饮食指数-2005 和替代健康饮食指数-2010 来衡量饮食质量。使用线性回归模型,调整社会人口统计学特征,估计家庭食物保障状况与膳食结果的相对平均差异。与较低收入的食物安全成年人相比,较低收入的食物不安全成年人报告说,他们更多地消费一些美味可口的食物,包括高脂肪乳制品(P 趋势<0.0001)和咸零食(P 趋势=0.01)。食物不安全也与更多的含糖饮料(P 趋势=0.003);更多的红/加工肉类(P 趋势=0.005);更多的坚果、种子和豆类(P 趋势=0.0006);更少的蔬菜(P 趋势<0.0001);以及更少的糖果和烘焙甜点(P 趋势=0.0002)。总能量和宏量营养素的摄入量没有差异。食物不安全与健康饮食指数-2005(P 趋势<0.0001)和替代健康饮食指数-2010 的评分显著相关(P 趋势<0.0001)。尽管没有宏量营养素的差异,但食物不安全与已知会增加慢性病风险的不良饮食质量特征有关。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014-8-1
Matern Child Health J. 2016-11
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015-3-11
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021-4
JAMA. 2016-6-21
JAMA Health Forum. 2025-9-5
BMC Public Health. 2025-8-27
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025-5-13