HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, MN 55440-1524, USA.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E29. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120097.
The advent of universal health care coverage in the United States and the use of electronic health records can make the medical record a disease surveillance tool. The objective of our study was to identify criteria that accurately categorize acute coronary and heart failure events by using electronic health record data exclusively so that the medical record can be used for surveillance without manual record review.
We serially compared 3 computer algorithms to manual record review. The first 2 algorithms relied on ICD-9-CM (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification) codes, troponin levels, electrocardiogram (ECG) data, and echocardiograph data. The third algorithm relied on a detailed coding system, Intelligent Medical Objects, Inc., (IMO) interface terminology, troponin levels, and echocardiograph data.
Cohen's κ for the initial algorithm was 0.47 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-0.54). Cohen's κ was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.55-0.68) for the second algorithm. Cohen's κ for the third algorithm was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00).
Electronic medical record data are sufficient to categorize coronary heart disease and heart failure events without manual record review. However, only moderate agreement with medical record review can be achieved when the classification is based on 4-digit ICD-9-CM codes because ICD-9-CM 410.9 includes myocardial infarction with elevation of the ST segment on ECG (STEMI) and myocardial infarction without elevation of the ST segment on ECG (nSTEMI). Nearly perfect agreement can be achieved using IMO interface terminology, a more detailed coding system that tracks to ICD9, ICD10 (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification), and SnoMED-CT (Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms).
美国全民医疗保险的普及和电子健康记录的使用使得病历成为疾病监测工具。我们的研究目的是确定仅使用电子健康记录数据准确分类急性冠状动脉和心力衰竭事件的标准,以便在无需人工记录审查的情况下使用病历进行监测。
我们连续比较了 3 种计算机算法与手动记录审查。前两种算法依赖于 ICD-9-CM(国际疾病分类,第 9 版,临床修正)代码、肌钙蛋白水平、心电图(ECG)数据和超声心动图数据。第三种算法依赖于详细的编码系统、智能医学对象公司(IMO)接口术语、肌钙蛋白水平和超声心动图数据。
初始算法的 Cohen's κ 为 0.47(95%置信区间 [CI],0.41-0.54)。第二种算法的 Cohen's κ 为 0.61(95% CI,0.55-0.68)。第三种算法的 Cohen's κ 为 0.99(95% CI,0.98-1.00)。
电子病历数据足以在无需人工记录审查的情况下对冠心病和心力衰竭事件进行分类。然而,当分类基于 ICD-9-CM 四位数字代码时,仅能与病历审查达成中度一致,因为 ICD-9-CM 410.9 包括心电图上 ST 段抬高的心肌梗死(STEMI)和心电图上 ST 段无抬高的心肌梗死(nSTEMI)。使用 IMO 接口术语可以达到几乎完美的一致,这是一种更详细的编码系统,可以跟踪 ICD9、ICD10(国际疾病分类,第十版,临床修正)和 SnoMED-CT(医学术语系统命名法)。