• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A shortened version of the Western ontario rotator cuff disability index: development and measurement properties.西安大略肩袖损伤功能障碍指数的简化版:开发与测量特性
Physiother Can. 2012 Spring;64(2):135-44. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2010-51. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
2
Validity and Responsiveness of the Short Version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (Short-WORC) in Patients With Rotator Cuff Repair.《肩袖修补术后患者使用 Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index(WORC)短版的有效性和反应性》
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 May;48(5):409-418. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7928. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
3
A validation of the Swedish version of the WORC index in the assessment of patients treated by surgery for subacromial disease including rotator cuff syndrome.瑞典版WORC指数在评估接受手术治疗的肩峰下疾病(包括肩袖综合征)患者中的有效性验证。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Apr 14;17:165. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1014-y.
4
Cross cultural adaptation and validation of the Greek version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index.跨文化调适与希腊版西部安大略肩肘(WORC)指数的验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Jun;45(13):2175-2184. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2083704. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
5
Cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two rotator cuff disease-specific outcome measures.两种肩袖疾病特异性结局指标的横断面和纵向结构效度。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Mar 13;7:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-26.
6
Validation of the Polish version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index in patients following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.西安大略肩袖指数波兰语版本在关节镜下肩袖修复术后患者中的验证
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Sep 12;19(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2238-9.
7
Reproducibility: Reliability and agreement of short version of Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (Short-WORC) in patients with rotator cuff disorders.再现性:肩袖疾病患者中西安大略肩袖指数简版(Short-WORC)的可靠性和一致性
J Hand Ther. 2016 Jul-Sep;29(3):281-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
8
Validity and reliability of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) for use in Brazil.用于巴西的西安大略肩袖指数(WORC)的有效性和可靠性。
Clin J Sport Med. 2008 May;18(3):266-72. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31817282f4.
9
The Western Ontario rotator cuff index in rotator cuff disease patients: a comprehensive reliability and responsiveness validation study.冈上肌肌腱病患者的 Western Ontario 肩袖指数:一项全面的可靠性和反应度验证研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jul;40(7):1611-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546512446591. Epub 2012 May 10.
10
Measurement properties of the Western Ontario rotator cuff outcome measure: a preliminary report.西安大略肩袖损伤疗效评估指标的测量属性:初步报告
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Sep-Oct;14(5):506-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.02.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Relevant treatment outcomes for individuals aged 60 and older with massive rotator cuff tears: a qualitative study with 16 patients.60岁及以上患有巨大肩袖撕裂的个体的相关治疗结果:一项对16名患者的定性研究。
Acta Orthop. 2025 Apr 14;96:322-330. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.43474.
2
Psychometric Properties of Full and Shortened Persian-version of Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index Questionnaires in Persian-speaking Patients with Shoulder Pain.西安大略肩袖指数问卷完整版和简化版波斯语版本在说波斯语的肩痛患者中的心理测量学特性
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022 Aug;10(8):668-676. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2022.64227.3082.
3
Psychometric Properties of the OSPRO-YF Screening Tool in Patients with Shoulder Pathology.OSPRO-YF筛查工具在肩部疾病患者中的心理测量学特性
Physiother Can. 2021 Winter;73(1):26-36. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2019-0046.
4
How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures.如何评估肩部功能:对现有经过验证的结局指标的系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 8;11(5):845. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050845.
5
Substantial clinical benefit, responsiveness, and sensitivity to change of three common outcome measures following shoulder arthroplasty.肩关节置换术后三种常见疗效指标的显著临床获益、反应性及对变化的敏感性。
SAGE Open Med. 2020 Jul 27;8:2050312120946218. doi: 10.1177/2050312120946218. eCollection 2020.
6
Evaluating the reproducibility of the short version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (Short-WORC) prospectively.前瞻性评估西安大略肩袖指数简版(Short-WORC)的可重复性。
JSES Int. 2019 Dec 20;4(1):197-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jses.2019.10.110. eCollection 2020 Mar.
7
Interpretation and content validity of the items of the numeric rating version short-WORC to evaluate outcomes in management of rotator cuff pathology: a cognitive interview approach.运用认知访谈法对数值评定版短-WORC 条目进行解读并评估其在肩袖病变管理中的结果的内容效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 30;18(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01339-7.
8
Impact of rotator cuff tendon reparability on patient satisfaction.肩袖肌腱可修复性对患者满意度的影响。
JSES Open Access. 2017 Apr 28;1(1):5-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jses.2017.03.003. eCollection 2017 Mar.
9
Short-term Outcomes of Arthroscopic Debridement and Selected Acromioplasty of Bursal- vs Articular-Sided Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears of Less Than 50.关节镜下清创术及对小于50%的滑囊侧与关节侧部分厚度肩袖撕裂进行选择性肩峰成形术的短期疗效
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Aug 27;6(8):2325967118792001. doi: 10.1177/2325967118792001. eCollection 2018 Aug.
10
Outcome of Expedited Rotator Cuff Surgery in Injured Workers: Determinants of Successful Recovery.受伤工人的肩袖损伤快速手术结果:成功康复的决定因素
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 May 22;5(5):2325967117705319. doi: 10.1177/2325967117705319. eCollection 2017 May.

本文引用的文献

1
A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function.一种评估肩部功能的标准化方法。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994 Nov;3(6):347-52. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80019-0. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
2
The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content.COSMIN 清单用于评估测量特性研究的方法学质量:对其内容的澄清。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Mar 18;10:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-22.
3
Convergent validity of the constant-murley outcome measure in patients with rotator cuff disease.肩袖疾病患者中Constant-Murley疗效评估指标的聚合效度
Physiother Can. 2008 Winter;60(1):72-9. doi: 10.3138/physio/60/1/72. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
4
A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Constant-Murley score.Constant-Murley 评分的心理测量特性的系统评价。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jan;19(1):157-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.04.008.
5
Outcome instruments: rationale for their use.结果测量工具:其使用的基本原理。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May;91 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):41-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01551.
6
Cross-sectional analysis of baseline differences of candidates for rotator cuff surgery: a sex and gender perspective.肩袖手术候选人基线差异的横断面分析:性别视角
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Feb 24;10:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-26.
7
Indications for rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.肩袖修复的适应症:一项系统评价
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Feb;455:52-63. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802fc175.
8
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.针对健康状况调查问卷的测量属性提出了质量标准。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. Epub 2006 Aug 24.
9
Responsiveness of self-report scales in patients recovering from rotator cuff surgery.肩袖手术康复患者自我报告量表的反应性
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 Jul-Aug;15(4):407-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.09.005.
10
Cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two rotator cuff disease-specific outcome measures.两种肩袖疾病特异性结局指标的横断面和纵向结构效度。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Mar 13;7:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-26.

西安大略肩袖损伤功能障碍指数的简化版:开发与测量特性

A shortened version of the Western ontario rotator cuff disability index: development and measurement properties.

作者信息

Razmjou Helen, Stratford Paul, Holtby Richard

机构信息

Holland Orthopaedic & Arthritic Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre ; Department of Physical Therapy.

出版信息

Physiother Can. 2012 Spring;64(2):135-44. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2010-51. Epub 2012 Apr 5.

DOI:10.3138/ptc.2010-51
PMID:23450087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3321993/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to develop and examine the measurement properties of a shortened version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), the SHORTWORC, in individuals with rotator-cuff pathology.

METHODS

The study occurred in two stages, both using secondary analysis of existing data sets. The first stage used cross-sectional data from candidates for rotator-cuff surgery to develop the SHORTWORC. The second stage examined various measurement properties of the SHORTWORC by analyzing scores from the WORC, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire, and the Constant-Murley score obtained from patients before and after rotator-cuff surgery. Approaches to validating the SHORTWORC included calculating the standard error of measurement (SEM) at an instant in time, performing a confirmatory factor analysis, correlating findings among the questionnaires, and examining differences between men and women. Sensitivity to change was investigated using standardized response mean and relative efficiency.

RESULTS

Data for 712 patients were used to develop the SHORTWORC, the final version of which consisted of 7 questions. Data for 166 patients (86 men, 80 women; mean age 57±11 years) were used for validation. The SEM based on internal consistency (SEMIC) was calculated as 7.43 SHORTWORC points. The SHORTWORC had similar convergent validity (r=0.72-0.82) and sensitivity to change (SRM=1.20 vs. 1.25, p>0.05) to the longer version. The relative efficiency of the SHORTWORC was 3.19 times that of the WORC (95% CI, 1.50-71.51) in discriminating men's from women's level of disability.

CONCLUSIONS

The SHORTWORC has indicators of validity, relative efficiency, and sensitivity to change comparable to those of the original version but has a smaller response burden.

UNLABELLED

The objective of this study was to develop and examine the measurement properties of a shortened version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), the SHORTWORC, in individuals with rotator-cuff pathology. The study occurred in two stages, both using secondary analysis of existing data sets. The first stage used cross-sectional data from candidates for rotator-cuff surgery to develop the SHORTWORC. The second stage examined various measurement properties of the SHORTWORC by analyzing scores from the WORC, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire, and the Constant–Murley score obtained from patients before and after rotator-cuff surgery. Approaches to validating the SHORTWORC included calculating the standard error of measurement (SEM) at an instant in time, performing a confirmatory factor analysis, correlating findings among the questionnaires, and examining differences between men and women. Sensitivity to change was investigated using standardized response mean and relative efficiency. Data for 712 patients were used to develop the SHORTWORC, the final version of which consisted of 7 questions. Data for 166 patients (86 men, 80 women; mean age 57±11 years) were used for validation. The SEM based on internal consistency (SEM) was calculated as 7.43 SHORTWORC points. The SHORTWORC had similar convergent validity (=0.72−0.82) and sensitivity to change (SRM=1.20 vs. 1.25, >0.05) to the longer version. The relative efficiency of the SHORTWORC was 3.19 times that of the WORC (95% CI, 1.50–71.51) in discriminating men's from women's level of disability. The SHORTWORC has indicators of validity, relative efficiency, and sensitivity to change comparable to those of the original version but has a smaller response burden.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是开发并检验西安大略肩袖指数(WORC)的简化版SHORTWORC在肩袖病变患者中的测量特性。

方法

本研究分两个阶段进行,均采用对现有数据集的二次分析。第一阶段使用肩袖手术候选者的横断面数据来开发SHORTWORC。第二阶段通过分析WORC、美国肩肘外科医师协会问卷的得分以及肩袖手术前后患者的Constant-Murley得分,检验SHORTWORC的各种测量特性。验证SHORTWORC的方法包括计算某一时刻的测量标准误差(SEM)、进行验证性因子分析、关联各问卷的结果以及检查男女之间的差异。使用标准化反应均值和相对效率来研究对变化的敏感性。

结果

712例患者的数据用于开发SHORTWORC,其最终版本由7个问题组成。166例患者(86例男性,80例女性;平均年龄57±11岁)的数据用于验证。基于内部一致性计算的SEM(SEMIC)为7.43个SHORTWORC分数点。SHORTWORC与较长版本具有相似的收敛效度(r = 0.72 - 0.82)和对变化的敏感性(SRM = 1.20对1.25,p>0.05)。在区分男性和女性的残疾水平方面,SHORTWORC的相对效率是WORC的3.19倍(95%CI,1.50 - 71.51)。

结论

SHORTWORC具有与原始版本相当的效度、相对效率和对变化的敏感性指标,但应答负担较小。

未标注

本研究的目的是开发并检验西安大略肩袖指数(WORC)的简化版SHORTWORC在肩袖病变患者中的测量特性。本研究分两个阶段进行,均采用对现有数据集的二次分析。第一阶段使用肩袖手术候选者的横断面数据来开发SHORTWORC。第二阶段通过分析WORC、美国肩肘外科医师协会问卷的得分以及肩袖手术前后患者的Constant-Murley得分,检验SHORTWORC的各种测量特性。验证SHORTWORC的方法包括计算某一时刻的测量标准误差(SEM)、进行验证性因子分析、关联各问卷的结果以及检查男女之间的差异。使用标准化反应均值和相对效率来研究对变化的敏感性。712例患者的数据用于开发SHORTWORC,其最终版本由7个问题组成。166例患者(86例男性,80例女性;平均年龄57±11岁)的数据用于验证。基于内部一致性计算的SEM为7.43个SHORTWORC分数点。SHORTWORC与较长版本具有相似的收敛效度(=0.72−0.82)和对变化的敏感性(SRM = 1.20对1.25,>0.05)。在区分男性和女性的残疾水平方面,SHORTWORC的相对效率是WORC的3.19倍(95%CI,1.50–71.51)。SHORTWORC具有与原始版本相当的效度、相对效率和对变化的敏感性指标,但应答负担较小。